Astron. Astrophys. 353, 1-9 (2000)
4. Attribution of the vacuum energy to a scalar quantum field
In this section it is shown that the vacuum energy can be
attributed to a scalar quantum field
in essentially the same way as by Starkovich & Cooperstock (1992)
and by Bayin et al. (1994), only some slight modifications being
necessary. For clearness the essential steps of their approach is
briefly recapitulated.
The scalar field that is
responsible for the vacuum energy density is conformally coupled to
the Ricci-curvature R and is described by a generalized
Klein-Gordon equation
![[EQUATION]](img232.gif)
where is the scalar field
potential and a numerical constant.
According to Birrel & Davies (1982) the energy-momentum-tensor of
the field is
![[EQUATION]](img235.gif)
With this from Einsteins field equations for
the equations
![[EQUATION]](img236.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img237.gif)
are obtained where
![[EQUATION]](img238.gif)
Differentiating (32) with respect to time t yields
![[EQUATION]](img239.gif)
and eliminating from this
equation with (33) yields and
![[EQUATION]](img242.gif)
From (32) and (33) can be
eliminated yielding
![[EQUATION]](img243.gif)
From this equation the time evolution of S can be determined
independently of the evolution of the field
if
is prescribed. Bayin et al. (1994) made the simplifying assumption
that during different eras in the evolution of the universe the
quantity defined in (34) assumed
different but constant values, especially a very small one,
, in the inflationary era.
With slight modifications these ideas can be incorporated into the
present model. For this purpose it is assumed, that the field
can be present in addition to
primordial matter of equal density
and has the same properties as without matter. (In order to explain
the primordial equipartition between energy of the field
and energy of matter, some
interaction should be present, but this has to be so small that it can
be neglected for the dynamical evolution.)
With this assumption, Eqs. (32)-(33) for
must be replaced by the equations
![[EQUATION]](img245.gif)
and Eq. (35) must be employed instead of the former assumption
that is recovered from (35) for
.
For an equilibrium and
must be satisfied, and in order to
obtain the same equilibrium as in Sect. 2 the assumption
must be made. With this, from
(36)-(37) one obtains and
![[EQUATION]](img251.gif)
as equilibrium conditions. The dynamics of deviations from
equilibrium is obtained from from (32) with (4) and (35), and
similarly as (9) one now obtains the equation
![[EQUATION]](img252.gif)
for it. With the same results as
in Sect. 2 would be obtained. An evolution similar to that obtained by
Bayin et al. (1994) can be achieved by assuming that
increases as soon as the equilibrium
is left, and saturates at the small value
in order to obtain inflation.
For studying the separation of
from the equilibrium value , the
ansatzes
![[EQUATION]](img254.gif)
and
![[EQUATION]](img255.gif)
with some constant are made.
Expansion of (39) with respect to
up to terms of order yields
![[EQUATION]](img259.gif)
and for real solutions must be
assumed in addition. With these assumptions an expansion evolution of
the universe from an initial equilibrium state through instability
becomes possible as in Sect. 2.
For with the assumption
Eq. (39) can be approximated by
![[EQUATION]](img263.gif)
and yields an evolution
![[EQUATION]](img264.gif)
Since is very large, this is an
inflation-like evolution although algebraic instead of exponential. At
some stage and with similar assumptions and consequences as in Sect. 2
a phase transition described by a rapid change of
must take place in order to enable
the transition to a Friedmann-Lemaître evolution.
In the primordial equilibrium state
viz.
,
and . With this from (29)-(31) the
condition
![[EQUATION]](img268.gif)
is obtained, and with the choice
it can be achieved that has an
extremum. is an arbitrary function
and since no condition is obtained for
, it appears that this quantity,
which is contained in (29)-(31) and (33), can be chosen such that the
extremum becomes a minimum.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: December 8, 1999
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |