![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 353, 473-478 (2000) 5. DiscussionWe have considered the acceleration of charged test particles via rotating magnetospheres based on a model topology which is motivated by the standard model for AGN (cf. Begelman 1994; Camenzind 1995; Fendt 1997). Accordingly, the jet magnetosphere originates very close to the central black hole from an accretion disk, with initially spherical profile until the relativistic jet is collimated to a cylindrical shape outside the light cylinder. The centrifugal particle acceleration model described in this paper
extends the calculations by Machabeli & Rogava (1994) and
Gangadhara & Lesch (1997). We find that the maximum Lorentz
factor attainable for an electron moving along a rotating magnetic
field line is substantially limited not only by radiation losses (e.g.
inverse-Compton) but also by the breakdown of the bead-on-the-wire
approximation which occurs in the vicinity of the light cylinder. Due
to these limiting effects, the acceleration of particles by rotating
magnetospheres seems to be rather less important in the case of AGN.
Our current calculations indicate, that for sub-Eddington accreting
black holes, such as black holes with advection-dominated accretion
flows (e.g. Narayan & Yi 1994; Narayan 1997), efficient
pre-acceleration of electrons to Lorentz factors of the order of a few
hundred might be possible, at least under the highly idealized
conditions of our analytical toy model. It seems interesting that the
highest energy gamma rays have been discovered from AGN of the BL Lac
type which very likely accrete in a sub-Eddington mode (e.g. Celotti
et al. 1998). Under such conditions, inverse-Compton scattering of
accretions disk photons with energy We wish to mention that the results in this paper essentially
depend on the assumed intrinsic magnetic field and the angular
frequency There are several restrictions on our approach, e.g. we have assumed a projected, two-dimensional geometry and rigid rotation of magnetic field lines almost up to the light cylinder, hence, concerning the last point, neglected a kind of toroidal twist (Begelman 1994), when the inertial forces overcome the tension in the field line so that the field line is swept back opposite to the sense of rotation. However, one would not expect that these restrictions alter our conclusions essentially since they should lower the upper limit for the maximum Lorentz factor by making the acceleration mechanism ineffective somewhat earlier. Another restriction is the use of special relativity in our analysis, which is only justified far away from the black hole. A detailed general relativistic model is needed to assess whether this might affect the results very strongly or not. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000 Online publication: December 17, 1999 ![]() |