Astron. Astrophys. 353, 498-506 (2000)
5. Discussion
In a recent work, Wu et al. (1999) have used the largest sample of
clusters of galaxies with good broad band X-ray spectroscopy from the
literature to discuss the and the
relationships 3.
Their sample is mainly composed by clusters at
(only 5 clusters out of 142 used
are at higher redshift). By comparing the clusters at
with those at
they do not find convincing
evidence for a significant evolution in the
and the
relationship out to
, a result which was first pointed
out by Mushotzky & Scharf (1997).
As summarized in Table 4, distant cluster temperatures which
have been measured to date are limited to a few systems at
. At these redshifts the lookback
time approaches half the age of the Universe and, therefore, the time
leverage to measure evolution in cluster properties is large.
![[TABLE]](img181.gif)
Table 4. Clusters at with a temperature measurement.
Notes:
a) For consistency with the other measurements we have reported in this column the 90% confidence range.
Ref :
WXF: Wu et al. (1999); M+S: Mushotzky & Scharf (1997); D96: Donahue (1996); D98: Donahue et al. (1998); G99: Gioia et al. (1999); D99: Donahue et al. (1999); HB98: Hughes & Birkinshaw (1998); H97: Hattori et al. (1997).
In Fig. 7, we plot the high redshift cluster temperatures known to
date in the plane. The error on the
temperature represent the 90% confidence range, while we have used a
realistic 15% absolute error for the bolometric luminosity. Since MS
2053.7-0449 and AXJ 2019-1127 have very large errors on the measured
temperature, we have not reported these objects in Fig. 7.
![[FIGURE]](img201.gif) |
Fig. 7. Clusters at z 0.5 with a temperature measurement (see Table 4). The filled square represents the Beppo SAX measured temperature of RXJ 0152.7-1357 reported in this paper. The objects have been labeled in order of increasing redshift. Error bars on the temperature represent the 90% confidence range, while error bars on the bolometric luminosity represent a realistic 15% absolute error. The solid line represents the derived relationship obtained by Wu et al. (1999) using a sample of 142 clusters from the literature; the dotted lines represent the scatter on the slope. The short dashed line represents the evolving relationship with at , while the long dashed line represents the evolving relationship with at . See Sect. 5 for details.
|
The relationship for clusters at
obtained by Wu et al. (1999)
( ) is also shown (solid line),
together with the on the slope
(dotted lines). The short-dashed line represents the evolving
relationship with
at , while the long dashed line
represents the evolving relationship
with
at
. The two redshifts enclose all the
objects shown in Fig. 7. For A1 and A2 we have assumed the values 1
and 3, respectively; these two values have been determined by Borgani
et al. (1999), and represent the 90% confidence level required to fit
the lack of observed evolution of the XLF in the RDCS cluster sample
in a = 1 universe. Low density
models, instead, can easily be accommodated with a non-evolving
relation, or mild
( ) evolution. The new cluster
temperature we have determined for RXJ0152.7-1357 is not consistent
with a strong evolution of the
relation out to . Since all the data
points in Fig. 7 lie to the right of the
line, according to the
parameterization of Borgani et al. (1999), the cluster temperatures
measured so far at lend considerable
support to cosmological models with a low density parameter. Similar
results have been recently obtained by Donahue et al. (1999) and by
Donahue & Voit (1999). Using a complete sample of high redshift
EMSS clusters, Donahue et al. (1999), have shown that the cluster
temperature function reveals modest evolution, a result which implies
a low value (Donahue & Voit
1999).
The metal abundance of the ICM in rich clusters of galaxies has
been recently investigated by Mushotzky & Loewenstein (1997). They
found that the Fe abundance shows little or no evolution out to
( ), suggesting that most of the
enrichment of the ICM occurred at .
Given the present uncertainty on the ICM abundance in RXJ 0152.7-1357
we cannot set strong constraints on the cosmological evolution of the
Fe abundance. However, within the large uncertainty
( ; 68% confidence interval), these
data suggest that the bulk of the Fe enrichment was completed by
.
Finally it is worth comparing RXJ 0152.7-1357 with MS1054.4-0321.
Provided that temperature measurements are not biased by cooling
flows, strong deviations from isothermality or by the presence of
contaminating AGN, it is interesting to note that the temperature of
MS1054.4-0321 is significantly higher than that of RXJ 0152.7-1357,
although the two clusters have very similar luminosities. With the
present X-ray data we are unable to discuss any further the difference
in temperature between these two distant clusters which have
nonetheless many similarities. The highly spatially resolved X-ray
spectroscopy and high throughput that Chandra and XMM will
provide are needed to clarify this problem as well as to study in
detail distant clusters of galaxies.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: December 17, 1999
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |