 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 353, 583-597 (2000)
3. Emission from the present mass loss gas
The central emission, present in both lines, presumably arises from
the envelope formed during the present mass loss epoch. We have
determined the peak positions by fitting two-dimensional Gaussians to
the data in the
-27.5 2
range. The result is (2000) =
19h40m57 00,
(2000) =
32o37´05 6 and
(2000) =
19h40m57 00,
(2000) =
32o37´05 9 for the
J= and
J= data, respectively. These
positions agree, within the uncertainty of
0 5,
well with each other and with the Hipparcos position of TT Cyg.
The central J= and
2 1 brightness distributions are well
fitted by circular Gaussians with deconvolved radii at half maxima of
1 1 (corresponding to
8 1015 cm at the adopted
distance) and 0 8
(6 1015 cm) and peak
brightnesses of 0.085 and 0.36 Jy beam-1, respectively.
That is, the emission is at least partly resolved, and the smaller
size in the J= line is
consistent with the higher energy requirements for exciting this line.
The source fluxes, i.e., the source brightnesses integrated over the
source, in the
-27.5 2
interval are 0.8 and 5.2 Jy in the
J= and
J= lines, respectively. This
suggests, at least partly, optically thin emission, or, as expected,
that the J= line emission
comes from a warmer region than the
J= line. The centre position
spectra are shown in Fig. 3. The
J= spectrum suggests partly
resolved optically thin emission, but the
J= spectrum indicates a higher
optical depth. The systemic and gas expansion velocities are estimated
to be -27.3 and
3.8 , respectively. The source fluxes
correspond to J= and
J= line intensities of 0.03
and 0.12 K, respectively, in the IRAM 30 m telescope (in the
-scale and assuming Gaussian sources
with the estimated sizes). This is consistent with the observed
intensities, 0.05: and
0.1 K in the
J= and
J= lines, respectively
(Olofsson et al. 1993).
![[FIGURE]](img61.gif) |
Fig. 3. CO(J= and J= ) spectra obtained towards the position of TT Cyg (upper and lower panel, respectively). The feature at -15 in the J= spectrum is due to emission from the shell
|
We have estimated the present mass loss of TT Cyg using these
data, and a radiative transfer model that determines the excitation of
the CO molecules, in a circumstellar envelope that expands with
constant velocity, using the Monte Carlo method. The energy balance
equation for the circumstellar gas is solved self-consistently taking
into account the CO line cooling (see Schöier, PhD thesis in
preparation, for details). Adopting the (uncertain) Hipparcos distance
of 510 pc, a luminosity of 2300
obtained from this distance and a derived apparent bolometric
magnitude, and a gas expansion velocity of
4 , and assuming a stellar temperature
of 2700 K, and a CO number abundance with respect to H2,
, of 10-3, we estimate a
mass loss loss rate of
3 10 .
The J= emission is optically
thin, but the J= is, at least
partly, optically thick. An outer radius of the CO envelope of
3 1016 cm was used in order
to fit the observed radial brightness distributions. This is half of
that obtained from the CO photodissociation model of Mamon et al.
(1988) for the derived mass loss rate, but it must be regarded as
within the uncertainties of this model when applied to low mass loss
rate objects. Thus, the present mass loss of TT Cyg lies at the
very low end of the mass loss rate distribution obtained by Olofsson
et al. (1993) for a sample of ( 100)
optically bright carbon stars. The same applies to the gas expansion
velocity, which is only about one third of the median gas expansion
velocity of this sample.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: December 17, 1999
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |