Astron. Astrophys. 354, L1-L5 (2000)
3. Results
Signal is detected in the central channels of both the CO(2-1) and
CO(5-4) spectral data sets at 10 and 5 sigmas respectively. The
averages of the channels with detected emission were used to produce
the integrated maps shown on Figs. 1a and 1c. The CO(2-1) integrated
flux is 1.4 Jy km s-1. There is no indication for any
extension of the emission at this resolution. The peak of the source
is offset by about from the position
of the optical source as measured by HST (Dey et al. 1999). This
offset is well within the astrometric accuracy of HST but if real it
may be indicative of a spatial extinction.
![[FIGURE]](img29.gif) |
Fig. 1. a CO(2-1) integrated intensity map; the contours are at 0.25 Jy beam-1 km s-1. b CO(2-1) spectrum at the center of the source. c CO(5-4) integrated intensity map; the contours are at 0.75 Jy beam-1 km s-1. d CO(5-4) spectrum at the center of the source. The contribution from the continuum is not subtracted from the line flux.
|
The corresponding CO(2-1) profile (Fig. 1b) is roughly gaussian,
with a FWHM of almost exactly 400 km s-1, and a central
frequency that corresponds to a redshift of
. The appearance of a flat-top or
even double peak profile around km
s-1 (see Fig1b) cannot be checked with the present data and
only observations at higher signal-to-noise ratio (those exploiting
the full spectral resolution) can settle its reality. The line-width
observed is fairly large, although not atypical for this kind of
sources (e.g. SMMJ02399, Frayer et al. 1998) and could be due either
to an edge-on system or to various separate components. The redshift
deduced from the CO line is apparently shifted from that deduced from
the H line
( ), but corresponds to the redshift
deduced from the [O II ] line at 3727 Å
( ).
This shift is still within the uncertainties in the optical redshift
but if real it would be different from what is typically found for low
redshift luminous galaxies (Sanders & Mirabel 1996), where
systematic blue-ward offsets of optical lines from the CO redshift are
attributed to outflows with dust obscuration (see e.g.,
Gonzalez-Delgado et al. 1998). The question remains, however,
completely open since a recent analysis by McIntosh et al. (1999) of a
sample of quasars shows how high-redshift objects present
H lines with a systematic mean
red-ward shift of 500 km/s with
respect to the systemic redshift of the objects (that defined by the
narrow line region). Even though the comparison with quasars may not
be fair since the line emitting regions could be different, HR10 seems
to show similar properties with the CO redshift corresponding to that
of the narrow forbidden lines and coinciding with the centre of mass
of the system, while the H line is
shifted with respect to that.
The integrated map corresponding to the CO(5-4) map (Fig. 1c) shows
a source at the same position as the CO(2-1) integrated map. The
integrated intensity of that source (corrected for the contribution of
the continuum) is 1.35 Jy km s-1. The corresponding CO(5-4)
profile (Fig. 1d) is roughly gaussian, with a FWHM of 380 km
s-1 similar to that of the CO(2-1) profile. The central
frequency corresponds to a redshift of
similar to that deduced from the
CO(2-1) line.
Although the CO level is
above the ground state the
integrated flux (in Jy km s-1) of CO(5-4) is equal to that
of the CO(2-1) line, . CO
luminosities, in solar units, are 1.5 and
for the CO(2-1) and CO(5-4) line respectively, while the total line
luminosities L are
and
K km s-1 pc2
, for the CO(2-1) and CO(5-4) line
respectively. When expressed in these latter units, the ratio between
the CO(2-1) and CO(5-4) luminosities of the same source is
proportional to the line intrinsic brightness (Rayleigh-Jeans)
temperature ratio integrated over the area of the source:
![[EQUATION]](img47.gif)
where is the source solid angle.
If the spatial extent of the CO(5-4) emission region is similar to
that of the CO(2-1) - a plausible hypothesis since both transitions
have same line-width and profile -
and corresponds to a value of the excitation temperature of
K (see e.g. Maloney, & Black
1988). If gas and dust are in thermodynamic equilibrium the kinetic
temperature would equal
, but it is usually found that
. In HR10 the dust temperature was
estimated to be (Cimatti et al 1998
, Dey et al. 1999) and this value can be taken as the upper limit to
the gas temperature. If we assume that
K the gas density implied by this
ratio is less than . As an example,
at K and
K the estimated excitation
temperature is K for a CO density of
. The present data cannot distinguish
between a picture where the dominant component of the ISM in this
system is a diffuse ( ) gas or whether
the medium is clumpy. The spatial shift between the CO and
H lines would be more compatible with
this latter picture.
If the ratio between L and the
mass of molecular gas is similar in HR10 and Arp 220 (Scoville et al.
1997b), the molecular gas mass in HR10, using the CO(2-1) line, is
, larger than what is usually found
in local ULIRGs (Solomon et al. 1997 , Braine & Dumke 1998) but
similar to that of other detected high-z sources (Frayer et al.
1998).
The 1.3mm continuum map shows only a marginal
( ) detection at the position of the
source, with an integrated flux of
mJy beam-1. The flux detected with the IRAM 30m telescope
was mJy (Cimatti et al 1998) at 240
GHz. Scaling the flux as , the PdBI
detection would correspond to an expected flux of
mJy at the observed frequency of the
30m. We exclude that this discrepancy is due to an extended component;
it is more likely due to the difference in the calibration of the two
instruments since the two values are consistent within the error
bars.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: January 31, 2000
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |