![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 354, 193-215 (2000) 8. Conclusions and future workWe have presented the spectra of seven Galactic luminous O stars, that have been analysed by means of non-LTE, plane-parallel, hydrostatic model atmospheres, including line-blocking, and by means of spherical, mass-losing models. We have used these analyses to study some additional effects (physical as well as due to applied approximations) that have an influence on the results. We have shown that line-blocking has to be taken into account when
analysing very hot stars, in plane-parallel as well as in spherical
models with mass-loss. Line-blocking indirectly affects the
spectral-line diagnostics through changes in the level populations of
He. Although for the spherical models with mass-loss we only made
simulations, this is clearly one direction for future model
improvements. In particular, we obtained very interesting results
concerning the He II
One of the conclusions of the present paper is that around 50 000 K (the exact value depending on gravity) we reach the limit of applicability of plane-parallel, hydrostatic models to real massive stars. This conclusion can be further refined, if we take into account the fact that line-blanketed models could give lower temperatures, or if we consider that spherical models with mass-loss will demand larger gravities. The final result would be models less affected by radiation pressure, larger masses and a cooler temperature scale. Spherical models with mass-loss are thus needed to analyse these stars. We had to correct the gravities of all stars (except HD 5 689) when using these models, sometimes with increments as large as 0.25 dex. Part of the differences in the stellar parameters derived from both sets of models are due to a change in the preferred temperature indicator. Our spherical models with mass-loss are also still not free from
internal inconsistencies. For some models with strong winds, we see
that He II The helium and mass discrepancies found here are in agreement with the findings of Paper I. The only difference is that we find a mass discrepancy also for luminosity class V stars, but this is actually misleading. What we find is that the luminosity class V stars analysed here have gravities lower than usual for their spectral classification. The conclusion of Paper I should then be changed to state that we do not find the mass discrepancy for stars with high gravities. At least a part of this effect is attributed to the fact that the intense radiation field affects the wings of the Balmer lines also for these stars. An additional possibility is that they actually never reach the zero-age main sequence (see, for example, Hanson 1998). Spherical models with mass-loss largely reduce the mass
discrepancy. Without solving it completely, the problem lies now in
the systematic trend of spectroscopic values to be lower than
evolutionary ones, but most of the individual values now agree within
the formal error bars. We have also shown that the spectroscopic
masses agree better with the predictions from the radiatively driven
wind theory, because they give ratios of the terminal wind velocity to
the escape velocity (or equivalently, values of the
From the point of view of individual stars, we have analysed some
of the most massive and luminous stars in the Milky Way. We have found
that three of them (Cyg OB2 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000 Online publication: January 31, 2000 ![]() |