Astron. Astrophys. 354, L57-L61 (2000)
4. Discussion
The SNR RX J1713.7-3946 is reminiscent of SN1006 both in the
synchrotron X-ray emission from the shell far from the centre of the
remnant and also in the TeV gamma-ray emission from an extended region
coincident with that of the non-thermal X-rays. This suggests that the
particles responsible for the emission of the high energy photons are
accelerated in shocks.
There are several possible emission processes of TeV gamma-rays:
the emission induced by accelerated protons (by the
decay process) and by electrons -
through bremsstrahlung and/or the Inverse Compton (IC) process. The
expected integral flux of gamma-rays above our threshold energy of
TeV by the
decay process is estimated to be
photons cm-2
s-1 (Drury et al. 1994, Naito & Takahara 1994), where
we assume the distance and the upper limit for the number density in
the ambient space of the remnant as 6 kpc and 0.28
atoms/cm3, respectively (Slane et al. 1999). This flux
value is too low to explain our observed flux, even taking into
account the large uncertainties in the estimates of the distance and
the ambient matter density of the remnant (Slane et al. 1999, Tomida
1999). However, there remains the possibility of some contribution of
the decay process if the remnant is
interacting with a molecular cloud located near the NW rim (Slane et
al. 1999). The relative contribution in emissivity of the
bremsstrahlung process compared to
decay process is estimated as %,
assuming the flux ratio of electrons to protons is
and that both have power law spectra
with the index of 2.4 (Gaisser 1990), indicating this process is also
unlikely to dominate. Therefore, the most likely process for TeV
gamma-ray emission seems to be the IC process.
Under this assumption, the magnetic field strength in the supernova
remnant can be deduced from the relation
between the IC luminosity
and synchrotron luminosity
, where
and
are the energy densities of the
magnetic field and the target photon field, respectively.
and
in the above formula must be due to
electrons in the same energy range. The value of
which should be compared with our
TeV gamma-ray data is estimated from the ASCA result to be
/ ,
extrapolating the synchrotron spectrum with the same power law out of
the energy range of 0.5-10 keV covered by ASCA (Tomida 1999). Here
erg cm-2 s-1
is the X-ray luminosity in the 0.5-10 keV energy band observed by ASCA
from the NW rim of the remnant and the power law index of -1.44 is the
mean value for index of X-rays in the same energy range (Tomida 1999).
keV is a typical synchrotron photon
energy emitted by electrons which emit 1.8 TeV photons (the threshold
energy of our observation) by the IC process when we assume the target
photons to be from the CMBR. The value of
is calculated to be
erg cm-2 s-1
from our result for the number of photons of TeV gamma-rays, and using
the fact that the spectra of synchrotron photons and IC photons follow
the same power law when the electrons have a power law spectrum. Thus
inserting ,
, and
erg cm-3 of the energy
density for the CMBR into the above relation, we can solve for the
magnetic field strength B. Finally, the magnetic field at the
NW rim is estimated to be G. The
extrapolation used to estimate is
reasonable, because is estimated to
be 0.15 keV; this is not so different from the minimum energy of the
ASCA band (0.5 keV).
The electrons responsible for the synchrotron and IC photon
emissions are likely to have been accelerated by the shocks in the
remnant as discussed above. If the maximum electron energy is limited
by synchrotron losses, this maximum energy can be estimated by
equating the cooling time due to synchrotron losses with the time
scale of acceleration by the first Fermi process in a strong shock as
TeV, where
is the shock velocity (Yoshida &
Yanagita 1997). On the other hand, equating the acceleration time with
the age of the remnant, the maximum energy can be expressed
TeV. In either case, whether it is
synchrotron losses or the age of the remnant that limits the maximum
electron energy (Reynolds & Keohane 1999), electrons should exist
with energies high enough to emit the observed synchrotron X-rays and
TeV gamma-rays by the IC process.
It is notable that both RX J1713.7-3946 and SN1006 have relatively
low magnetic field strengths and low matter densities in their ambient
space. These common features may have arisen if the magnetic field was
`frozen in' to the matter without amplification other than by
compression by shocks and may be the reason why electrons are
accelerated to such high energies. These facts may also explain the
radio quietness (Green 1998) and the weak emissivity of
decay gamma-rays of the remnants.
For SN1006, the low matter density in the ambient space might result
from the remnant being located far off the galactic plane and the
supernova being of type Ia. For RX J1713.7-3946, the low matter
density may be caused by material having been swept out by the stellar
wind of the supernova progenitor (Slane et al. 1999). The low magnetic
field and the low matter density in the ambient space of SN1006 and
RX J1713.7-3946 may explain why TeV gamma-rays have been detected so
far only for these two remnants.
In conclusion, we have found evidence for TeV gamma-ray emission
from RX J1713.7-3946 at the level of 5.6 sigma. If confirmed (à
la Weekes 1999), this would be the second case after SN1006 to show
directly that particles are accelerated up to energies of
TeV in the shell type SNR.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: January 31, 2000
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |