 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 355, 176-180 (2000)
3. Predicted 19F yields from individual WR stars
As discussed by Arnould et al. (1999) on grounds of the NACRE
rates, could be overproduced (with
respect to solar) by the CNO cycle only at temperatures around
K, the exact level of this
overproduction remaining poorly predictable, however, in view of
remaining rate uncertainties. This conclusion contradicts the one
derived from the use of the rates recommended by Caughlan & Fowler
(1988), in which case fluorine can never emerge in significant amounts
from the CNO burning. As the latter rates are adopted in our
calculations, the CNO zones of the computed model stars are depleted
in . This translates directly into a
decrease of the mass fraction
at the stellar surfaces when the
-depleted CNO ashes are uncovered by
mass loss (with the choice of the ordinate scales, the changes of
fluorine abundance at the center and at the surface during the
H-burning phase are not visible on Fig. 1). With the NACRE rates,
it is expected that more would be
present at the surface. However, it is also likely that this change is
not able to affect drastically the predicted final yields, as these
are dominated by the made during the
He-burning phase.
![[FIGURE]](img51.gif) |
Fig. 1. Evolution of the total mass , of the mass of the convective core , and of the central ( ) and surface ( ) mass fractions for the 60 model stars with metallicities , 0.020 and 0.040 during the end of the H-burning stage and the whole He-burning phase. The initial mass fraction is assumed to relate to the solar value by . The spectroscopic types encountered during the evolution are indicated on the right of the figure: OV for O-type main sequence stars, LBV for Luminous Blue Variables, WNL, WNE and WC for the different classes of WR stars. Note the different ordinate scales on the left and on the right of the figure.
|
In fact, as seen in Fig. 1, fluorine builds up through
during the early phase of core
He-burning. However, at the end of He-burning,
is responsible for a significant
destruction. Thus, material
experiencing the whole He-burning episode cannot be
-enriched. In contrast, in massive
stars going through the WR stage (initial mass
for
,
for ; see Maeder & Meynet 1994),
some synthesized early during the
core He-burning phase is ejected into the interstellar medium by
stellar winds before its destruction . Indeed, Fig. 1
exhibits an increase of when the
He-burning products appear at the surface during the WC phase. As a
result, the ratio of the average
surface mass fraction during the
whole WC phase to the solar system
mass fraction takes values as high as about 55, 95 and 60 in the case
of the model stars with
, 0.02 and 0.04, respectively.
Fig. 2 shows the "wind"
yields for the computed stars ( ,
Z) with initial mass and
metallicity Z. These yields, noted
, are equal to
![[EQUATION]](img71.gif)
where is the total lifetime of
the star ( , Z),
its mass loss rate at age t,
its
surface mass fraction at age t, and
its initial
mass fraction, assumed to relate to
by
. These yields may be negative if
most of the ejected material has been depleted in fluorine.
![[FIGURE]](img69.gif) |
Fig. 2. Mass of ejected by the stellar winds ( in Eq. (1)) as a function of the initial mass and metallicity.
|
Fig. 2 demonstrates that the highest yields are obtained for
stars with and
. At lower metallicities, the winds
are indeed weaker, and thus uncover the He-burning core only for the
most massive stars and when the 19F has already been burnt.
On the other hand, at higher metallicities and for
, the H-burning core mass decreases
so rapidly during the main sequence as a consequence of very strong
stellar winds that the He-burning core becomes too small for being
uncovered by the stellar winds.
The above discussion shows that the most important physical
ingredient influencing the WR yields
is the metallicity-dependent mass loss rates, quantities like
convective core masses being less crucial in this respect. As a
numerical example, the value for
rises from about 18 in the 60 low
mass loss rate model of Meynet & Arnould (1993) to about 95 in the
same model star computed in this paper with an increased
value. This high sensitivity to
might cast doubts on the reliability
of the predicted yields. In fact,
some confidence in the results presented in this paper may be gained
by noting that our present choice of the mass loss rates allows to
account for the variation with metallicity of the number ratio of WR
to O-type stars in regions of constant star formation rate (Maeder
& Meynet 1994).
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: March 17, 2000
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |