 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 355, 713-719 (2000)
4. Discussion
4.1. Contamination with compact HII regions
At the distance of M33, low-excitation PNe can be misidentified
with compact HII regions. We used the
R=I([O III
])/I(H +[N II
]) line ratio to estimate the possible contamination of HII regions in
our sample of candidate PNe. The distribution of R for the 127
objects in Table 2 in which both the [O III]
and H +[N II]
fluxes have been measured is shown in the upper box of Fig. 3. In
the lower box, we show for comparison the distribution of 808 Galactic
PNe whose fluxes are quoted in the Strasbourg-ESO Catalogue of
Galactic PNe (Acker et al. 1992). The two distributions are very
similar for , as expected since HII
regions have generally a lower excitation class than PNe. In the
sample of M33 there is an excess of objects with
as compared to the Galaxy,
indicating possible contamination by compact HII regions. Since the
percentage fraction of PNe with in
the Galaxy is 25 while it raises to
35 in the sample of M33, assuming
that the distributions of R are the same in the Galaxy and in
M33, we expect that around 15 objects in Table 2 could be in fact
HII regions.
![[FIGURE]](img27.gif) |
Fig. 3. Histograms of the R for PNe in M33 and in the Galaxy.
|
4.2. The luminosity function (PNLF)
In recent years it has been shown that the PNLF is a good
extragalactic secondary distance indicator (Jacoby 1997).
In order to build the PNLF, we have converted
[O III] fluxes into equivalent V-band magnitudes
following Jacoby (1989):
![[EQUATION]](img29.gif)
We have then estimated the completeness of our sample for the 131
candidate PNe with measured [O III] fluxes. We
calculate the signal to noise ratio (S/N) for our candidates.
Ciardullo et al. (1987) found a linear relationship between S/N and
completeness, putting the limit of completeness at
S/N 10. This would correspond in our
frames to a limiting [O III] magnitude of about
23.
We note a lack of PNe in the central zone and in the densest
regions along the spiral arms. This is likely due to the high stellar
background in the inner disc/bulge and to the presence of many giant
HII regions in the spiral arms, which make difficult to detect PNe.
Another effect causing incompleteness is the galactic background
emission and the presence of large complexes of HII regions. Faint PNe
can be missed because of the bright background of the inner disc,
bulge and spiral arms of M33. The bulge of M33 is small, having a
characteristic de Vaucouleurs' radius
(defined as the radius within which
half the total light is emitted) of 110 arcsec (Baggett et al. 1998).
Even at much shorter distances from the centre, however, the light
from the disc of M33 dominates the galaxy background emission, with
its tight spiral-arm design highly populated by HII regions. To avoid
this high background and crowded region, we rejected from the study of
the PNLF the 6 candidate PNe closer than 180 arcsec from the centre of
M33. We also conservatively lowered the limiting magnitude to 22.6
mag, slightly more luminous than the point at which our observational
PNLF turns down indicating incompleteness. This magnitude corresponds
to a S/N of about 20.
Using the luminosity parameters for M33 derived by Baggett et al.
(1998) by means of bulge-disc decomposition of its brightness profile,
we expect that the total luminosity
of the region of M33 used to build our PNLF comes from the disc. From
that, adopting the specific planetary luminosity density for M31
(Ciardullo et al. 1989), we estimate a total of about 180 objects
within 2.3 mag from the PNLF cutoff of about 20.3 mag. This figure has
to be compared with the 75 candidate PNe that we effectively detected
in M33 within the adopted completeness limit.
We applied the Eddington formula (Eddington 1913) to our data in
order to correct for the effects of observational errors, and fit the
resulting luminosity function for the complete sample of 75 PNe to the
"universal" PNLF
![[EQUATION]](img33.gif)
In Eq. (2) m is the observed [O III
] magnitude from Eq. (1), and
is the apparent magnitude of the PNLF cutoff of M31 (Jacoby 1989).
This sample of 75 objects contains all candidate PNe within the
established completeness limits regardless of their R ratio,
since we already noticed that a substantial number of PNe are observed
in the Galaxy with . Their luminosity
function is presented in the upper panel of Fig. 4. In order to
check whether exclusion of the objects with large
H +[N II] over
[O III] fluxes produces some effects on the PNLF,
we also fit the theoretical formula to objects with
only (Fig. 4, lower panel).
Although the amplitude of the PNLF changes somewhat, in both cases we
found the same apparent distance modulus of 24.62. This is because the
most luminous objects in [O III] have generally
also large R values (apart from few, but noteworthy
exceptions). In fact, 80% of the candidates in the complete sample
have , and if we restrict to the most
critical luminosity range of the PNLF of M33, i.e. to magnitudes
smaller than 21.6, 90% of the objects have
and some 80% have
. Thus the shape of the high
luminosity tail of PNLF is not changed significantly by excluding
objects with low R values, as confirmed by a further test in
which we obtain the same results as above by considering objects with
only.
![[FIGURE]](img38.gif) |
Fig. 4. The PNLF for M33, for all objects (upper box) and for those with (lower box). The adopted completeness limit is at 22.6 mag. Only the complete sample (full circles) is used to fit the theoretical PNLF (solid line).
|
The apparent distance modulus need to be corrected for foreground,
Galactic reddening ( , Burstein &
Heiles 1984) as well as for dust extinction within M33. The latter is
an important source of uncertainty in the present analysis. Freedman
et al. (1991) derived (foreground +
internal) for Cepheids in M33. Cepheids, however, are population I
objects, and are located close or within the thin dust layer of M33.
PNe are instead generally associated with an older disc population; in
the Galaxy, for instance, they have a scale height above the disc two
or three times larger than the dust layer (cf. Corradi & Schwarz
1995). Then some of our PNe will lie in front of the dust layer of M33
(which is seen relatively face-on), and will have a very small
reddening; other objects will instead lie behind it, and will be
characterized by a reddening similar (or only slightly larger) to that
of the Cepheids. As a consequence, the average reddening for PNe is
likely to fall between the foreground value
( ) and that of Cepheids
( ). The effect is difficult to
quantify. As a test, we have computed the PNLF for PNe which are
located at a galactocentric distance larger than one scale length of
the exponential disc of M33 (530", Baggett et al. 1998). Results
obtained for other spiral galaxies (Xilouris et al. 1999) indicate
that at such a distance the average, face-on extinction of a spiral
galaxy is expected to be lower than 0.35 mag in V,
corresponding to . In addition, most
of the selected PNe are located in the inter-arm region, where
extinction is expected to be even lower. By considering this subsample
of PNe which is less affected by extinction within M33, we obtain the
same apparent distance modulus as above, suggesting that our results
are not strongly affected by dust internal to M33. Lacking of better
estimates, we correct the apparent distance modulus using the value
indicated by Freedman et al. (1991), and obtain a corrected modulus of
. The error is obtained by combining
the error associated with our best least mean square fits
( mag) in quadrature with those
associated with the photometric zero point (0.03 mag) and the adopted
extinction (0.09 mag from Freedman et al. 1991). In addition, two
systematic errors come from the uncertain definition of the empirical
PNLF (0.05 mag) and the distance of the calibration galaxy M31 (0.10
mag).
All that finally leads to a distance to M33 of
kpc in excellent agreement with
the value derived from the Cepheids method
( kpc, Freedman et al. 1991).
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: March 9, 2000
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |