![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 355, 818-828 (2000) 6. DiscussionGlobal current-driven instabilities of magnetized jets are studied
in the linear regime. For this purpose a normal mode analysis has been
performed for force-free screw pinches. The stability of such
equilibria is conveniently discussed in terms of the magnetic pitch,
The stability properties can be discussed in terms of a single
parameter, the pitch value on the axis,
For small pitch the stability properties become essentially independent of the details of the pitch profile. While the nature of the instability (resonant or not) does not affect the growth rate and the axial wavelength of the most unstable mode, an important difference consists in the radial component of the perturbed magnetic field. The latter can vanish at some resonant radius only for an increasing pitch profile. Since it is well known from the non-linear evolution of the internal kink mode in TOKAMAKs that a current sheet forms at the resonant radius, we have studied its non-linear evolution in the small pitch regime by means of a time-dependent 3D MHD code (Lery et al. 2000). In general, both current-driven and Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities are present in the kind of jet models considered, and in the general case it is not possible to classify them unambiguously. To this end we have studied jet models which are particularly simple, and which are characterized by a constant density and velocity. In this approximation the CDI and the KHI can be identified for supermagnetosonic jets by comparing them to the static and the current-free counterparts, respectively. A velocity shear would lead to a more complicated coupling between the KHI and the CDI. Instabilities with wavelengths which are large compared to the radial scale of the shear behave essentially as in the case of a vortex sheet. Furthermore, in configurations with small pitch the electric current, and consequently also the instability is concentrated in the vicinity of the axis. In this case a velocity shear which is likely to be largest near the jet boundary does not affect the instability very much either. Current-driven instabilities can then be studied in the rest frame of the jet plasma, and the motion only enters through appropriately chosen boundary condition. The normal modes of static MHD plasmas can be classified according to their properties as (slow and fast) magnetoacoustic and Alfvén modes. These are "wave-like" disturbances for which a super-fast-magnetosonic shear layer essentially becomes impermeable. The situation is different for the Kelvin-Helmholtz surface modes. Here it is the (supersonic) velocity itself which by virtue of its inertia deforms the boundary of the jet. We argue that for supermagnetosonic flows CDI develop essentially as if the jet were surrounded by a rigid wall. We examined the properties of current-driven instabilities of jets with different Mach numbers using radiation boundary conditions which are most appropriate for this purpose. We find that in fact the CDI is an instability in the rest frame of the jet, and for high Mach numbers the dispersion relation and the eigenfunctions become indistinguishable from the static case, i.e. the jet boundary is not radially displaced in the linear regime. At low Mach number the dispersion relation shows a more complicated behaviour, due to the interaction with the velocity shear. In this regime it becomes difficult to disentangle the different types of instabilities. The maximum growth rate and the most unstable wavenumber, however, remain nearly unaltered, even for vanishing velocity. This was analyzed for the constant pitch field and a configuration with radially increasing pitch, i.e. for a non-resonant and a resonant mode, respectively (Table 1). It confirms that CDI in jets are instabilities which grow in the restframe of the jet, and that it is justified to study them using fixed boundary conditions, as was done in most of the numerical calculations. The jet configurations analyzed generally possess a net electrical
current. The return current either flows back on the surface of the
jet, or as a more diffuse current distributed over a larger region in
the ambient medium. A comparison showed that the results are not much
affected by this choice. The perturbation,
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000 Online publication: March 9, 2000 ![]() |