![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 355, L31-L33 (2000) 3. DiscussionThe proposed modification, while retaining the basic and most successful characteristic of the unification model (i.e. that all intermediate and type 2 Seyferts harbour an obscured type 1 nucleus), explains, at least qualitatively, the observed differences between the average properties of Seyfert 1s and Seyfert 2s and between the column density distributions of intermediate and strict type 2 Seyferts. This model is somewhat different (even if on a similar line of thought) from that proposed by Maiolino & Rieke (1995), and takes into account recent observational results. The two `flavours' of Seyferts, with and without the thick torus, may represent either two different branches in the AGN evolution, or a different evolutionary stage in the life of any (or most) source. Testing the proposed model would require further studies of the
statistical properties of Seyferts, which caution in separating
intermediate and strict type 2 sources. For instance, as the torus is
expected to be axially symmetric (while the dust lanes are probably
more randomly distributed), a correlation between Compton-thick
absorption and presence of ionization cones and large polarization is
expected. Another test is to search for the presence of the torus in
Seyfert 1s, as we predict that many sources of this class do not have
it. This may be done either by searching for strong IR emission (which
however may be related to starburst rather than reprocessing of
UV/X-rays from thick matter), of by searching for signatures of X-ray
reprocessing (e.g. Ghisellini, Haardt & Matt 1994;
Krolik, Madau
& Zycki 1994). The latter way
have already produced a clear case of a Seyfert 1 with the
torus: NGC 4051 was caught by BeppoSAX when the nuclear emission
was switched-off, and clear evidence for reprocessing by large amount
of optically thick distant matter was present (e.g. a
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000 Online publication: March 9, 2000 ![]() |