Astron. Astrophys. 355, 1003-1008 (2000)
2. Observations and data reduction
The H data have been obtained
during two observing runs at the Danish 50 cm telescope located at
ESO-La Silla (Chile): 1982, April 20 - May 2 (12 nights, observer NV)
and 1982, July 11 - 31 (20 nights, observer WWW), using the
two-channel H photometer described by
Grönbech & Olsen (1977). A beam splitter in front of the
field lens in the direct beam reflected 20% of the light via a
spherical mirror through a second field lens. The two photomultipliers
of type EMI 6256SA were operated at ambient temperature. The filters
were placed immediately in front of the cathodes, the narrow filter in
the direct beam and the wide filter in the reflected beam. Thus, the
fluxes falling on the cathodes were approximately equal. The dead-time
of the photoelectron counting system was 70 nanoseconds. In order to
avoid large dead-time corrections we limited our observations to stars
V 3 mag.
The standard stars were taken from Tables 3 and 7 in
Grönbech & Olsen (1977) which are based on the system defined
by Crawford & Mander (1966). In order to control possible
sensitivity changes in the photomultipliers we measured about 5 - 10
standard stars at the beginning and at the end of each night, and 1 -
2 standards every 2 hours during the night. Some individual standard
stars were observed 2 - 3 times during the same night at different air
masses, but no significant effects on atmospheric extinction and/or
telescope position were found.
As program stars we selected all Ap stars with
V 8.5 mag in Table IV of
Bidelman & McConnell (1973) within the right ascension range
accessible during our observing runs (approx. 0h 30
min 4 h
and
8 h 23 h).
The main goal of our observations was to obtain precise
values of each program star in at
least two different observing nights. In order to reach an accuracy of
0.3% per measurement a total net count rate of about 300000 in each
channel was necessary. For practical reasons, the integration time
unit was fixed to 20 seconds for standard stars and to 100 seconds for
program stars. The integration was repeated as often as necessary to
reach the desired total of 300000 counts per channel.
The reduction procedure was rather simple and straightforward:
first, we determined the mean instrumental value
of each standard star, as an average
from all observing nights within one run (April/May or July resp.).
Subsequently, the individual deviations
= -
of all standard stars versus time were considered for determining
drifts and zero point corrections of each observing night. Applying
these corrections, all measurements (standard and program stars) were
converted into a uniform instrumental
system. Finally, the transformation into the standard system was
performed by means of a simple linear least squares fit
![[EQUATION]](img12.gif)
based on the mean values of the standard stars. While the classical
procedure (Crawford & Mander 1966) divides the stars into two
groups (B-type and late type stars) yielding separate
-transformations for them, our data
could be reduced for both groups together, since no increase of the
scatter around the regression line was found compared to the analysis
of the individual groups.
The HD identifications, the mean
values and the total number N of observations obtained are listed in
Table 1. The resulting internal mean errors of the April/May run
are rather small (0.003 mag) while those of the July run are larger
(about 0.005 mag in average), probably due to worse weather condition
which prevented, in some cases, to reach the above mentioned accuracy
requirements. On the other hand, in the July run we obtained more
individual observations (up to 6 per star). Therefore, the accuracy in
the final mean values in each observing run should be comparable.
Fig. 1 shows the error distribution of the observed
H values. About 95 % of our program
stars have a
0.02 mag.
![[FIGURE]](img17.gif) |
Fig. 1. The error distribution of all measured H indices.
|
![[TABLE]](img21.gif)
Table 1. Mean H indices for 233 Ap stars.
![[TABLE]](img22.gif)
Table 1. (continued)
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: March 21, 2000
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |