 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 355, 1115-1121 (2000)
4. Discussion
4.1. NH3 in the direction of IRAS sources
Twelve of the 108 HII regions observed have associated IRAS sources
with color indices of ultra compact HII regions. We consider that an
IRAS source is associated with the HII region when it is displaced by
less than the telescope half power beam width from the observed
position. These sources are listed in Table 2 where
Columns (1) and (2) give the names of the ammonia and IRAS
sources, (3) and (4) give the equatorial coordinates of the IRAS
sources, (5) the distance in arc minutes between the observed
positions and the IRAS sources, Column (6) through (9) give the
IRAS fluxes, and finally Column (10) the luminosity obtained
integrating the four uncorrected IRAS color bands. Attached to the
flux density for each IRAS band is given the flux quality. It is
remarkable that 7 of these positions have positive ammonia detection,
while in the other 5 there is evidence of weak emissions. These
results show that there is a high detection rate of NH3
when the observed position has an
associated IRAS point source with color index of ultra-compact HII
region. This detection rate is compatible with the rate of 70 %
observed by Churchwell et al. (1990) toward northern hemisphere
ultra-compact HII regions using the Effelsberg radio telescope.
![[TABLE]](img14.gif)
Table 2. Compact IRAS Sources with Color Index of Ultra-Compact HII Regions.
NOTE:
The IRAS fluxes are not color corrected. In order to estimate the luminosity we integrated the flux density in frequency and used the source distance given in Table 1. Attached to the flux density in each frequency band, the IRAS flux quality is given
4.2. Distribution of NH3 sources in Galactic longitude
The distribution in Galactic longitude of the HII regions and the
detected NH3 sources are similar, as can be seen in
Fig. 1. However, the distribution of HII regions presents two
peaks, one between
-
with 36 sources and the other between
-
with 13 sources. The NH3 distribution also has a peak at
- ,
but does not present any source at the position of the second peak.
Moreover, the region between
-
has only two ammonia sources detected, compared with the 20 observed
HII regions. Kinematic distances indicate that the two sources are in
the solar neighborhood. To test the statistical significance of these
results, we applied the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to the samples. Using
the complete distribution, we found an 88 % probability of both
samples having the same distribution, while the probability increased
to 99.9 % when only longitudes larger than
were considered. This result
confirms the importance of the absence of NH3 sources in
the interval
- .
This range of longitudes is located between the local Cygnus arm and
the Perseus arm, at a distance from the Sun of more than 3 kpc. The
absence of ammonia in this direction could be explained if the
observed HII regions were located at larger distances from the Sun
than others, but this in not the case. In fact, the sources G287.3-0.7
and 287.9-0.8, which are associated with the Carina Nebula, are
located at about 2.7 kpc from the Sun and G291.3-0.7 has a kinetic
distance between 2.2 and 3.5 kpc. These are typical distances of
sources seen in other directions.
![[FIGURE]](img21.gif) |
Fig. 1. Histograms, in galactic coordinates, of the distribution of selected HII regions and positions with positive NH3 detection (hatched block).
|
The absence of NH3 sources could also be explained if
the HII regions were in a more advanced evolutionary state or if they
were mass limited, with the molecular clouds surrounding them already
dissociated. However, the existence of dense molecular gas observed in
this longitude interval through formaldehyde absorption, and CO(1-0),
HCO+(1-0) and CS(2-1) emission lines, seem to invalidate
this argument (Whiteoak & Gardner 1974, Wouterloot & Brand
1989, Batchelor et al. 1981, Bronfman et al. 1996). Another
possibility is that the physical conditions for the excitation of the
ammonia molecule are no longer present, even if the molecule does
exist. This argument can be discarded when we look at other molecules,
like HCO+ and CS which are excited under physical
conditions similar to the metastable ammonia lines.
4.3. Distribution of NH3 sources with distance to the Galactic center (Fig. 3)
The parameter which differentiates the samples of HII and
NH3 sources at galactic longitudes between
- and
- is
the distance to the Galactic Center. The region with no NH3
emission, between and
, is located far from the center, near
or outside the solar orbit. Histograms of the distributions of the
selected HII regions and detected ammonia sources as a function of
distance to the Galactic Center are shown in Fig. 2. The graph of
the observed HII regions shows an almost symmetric distribution with a
peak at 6.5 kpc. The ammonia distribution has a peak at the same
position but presents a strong asymmetry with a small number of
ammonia sources at distances larger than 6.5 kpc. To obtain the
statistical significance of this asymmetry we plotted the ratio of the
number of ammonia sources to HII regions as a function of the distance
to the Galactic center. A very well defined linear trend is found,
with a slope of -0.08 kpc-1 and a correlation coefficient
. If, as discussed above, there is
dense molecular gas associated with these HII regions and the physical
conditions are favorable to NH3 emission, then the decrease
in the number of detected ammonia sources could be due to a decrease
in their brightness temperature, which puts them below the
detectability limit of our radiotelescope. The decrease in brightness
temperature could be due to a decrease in the ammonia abundance with
the distance to the galactic center, as a consequence of the gradient
in the nitrogen abundance. In fact, N and O abundance gradients of
about -0.08 dex kpc-1 have been identified in HII regions
(Shaver et al. 1983; Simpson et al. 1995; Afflerbach et al. 1997), and
in type II planetary nebulae (Maciel & Chiappini 1994).
![[FIGURE]](img26.gif) |
Fig. 2. Histograms, in distance to the galactic center of the observed HII regions and positions with positive ammonia detection (hatched block).
|
![[FIGURE]](img28.gif) |
Fig. 3. Distribution of the fraction of detected ammonia sources (F) as a function of the distance to the galactic center.
|
4.4. The distribution of NH3 sources with brightness temperatures
The gradient of nitrogen abundance, the detection rates and the
distribution of NH3 sources with brightness temperature
were used to determine the distribution of sources with H2
column density. Several assumptions were made: (a) the brightness
temperature of the source is proportional to the NH3
abundance. This is valid for low optical depth, which is a good
assumption since for more than 60 ammonia sources observed toward HII
regions (MacDonald et al. 1981, Vilas-Boas et al. 1988, Churchwell et
al. 1990) the average value of is
around unity, (b) the NH3 abundance is proportional to the
nitrogen abundance, true if the regions have similar H2 and
metal abundances (Graedel et al. 1982). The effects of other
parameters, as cloud age, time to reach equilibrium, UV illumination,
shocks and dust mantle destruction are supposed to be averaged, since
we observe molecular clouds associated with HII regions in different
stages of evolution. (c) the angular size of the molecular clouds
where the ammonia sources are located is large compared with the
radiotelescope beam, the consequences of this assumption will be
discussed later, (d) the filling factor (fraction of the beam covered
by the NH3 sources) is the same for the whole cloud. This
is true if the ammonia sources are formed by small high density
clumps, uniformly distributed in the molecular cloud. Evidence in
favor of this assumption are given by Stuzki & Winnewisser (1985),
who showed that in order to explain the anomalies in the intensity of
the hyperfine satellite inversion lines, it is necessary to assume
that the NH3 sources are formed by a large number of
independent clumps with sizes of the order of 10-2 pc and
masses of about a solar mass, (e) the kinetic temperature of each
clump (or its distribution) is independent of the galactocentric
distance. Although a gradient in kinetic temperature is observed in
HII regions, where the main coolant is ionized oxygen, it is not
expected in molecular clouds with temperatures smaller than 50 K,
where the coolant is CO, which is optically thick in these dense
regions. Assumptions (c) and (d) justify the subsequent use of
measured antenna temperature T instead of brightness
temperature.
Let us define as the fraction of
the detected sources with temperature between T and
at distance R from the
Galactic Center. The total fraction of sources detected at distance
R will be:
![[EQUATION]](img33.gif)
where is given by the detection
limit of the radiotelescope and is
the maximum temperature of the sources (the excitation temperature in
the limit of an optically thick source). Since we assumed that the
brightness temperature is proportional to the nitrogen abundance, we
can write:
![[EQUATION]](img36.gif)
where is some reference distance
at which the source temperature is
and dex kpc-1 is the N
gradient in the Galaxy (Maciel & Chiappini 1994).
Also, since we have assumed that the only difference between the
molecular clouds at different distances is their NH3
content, the sources at a distance R and temperatures between
T and will have temperatures
between and
at the distance
. Therefore we can write:
![[EQUATION]](img41.gif)
Eq. (1) becomes:
![[EQUATION]](img42.gif)
where now the minimum temperature is a function of R, given
by:
![[EQUATION]](img43.gif)
The slope of will be:
![[EQUATION]](img45.gif)
From (4), (5) and (6) we obtain:
![[EQUATION]](img46.gif)
Comparing this expression with the best fit to our data in
Fig. 3, , we conclude that
should vary as
, with
. If the angular sizes of the
molecular clouds are smaller than the radiotelescope beam size, the
filling factors will decrease with distance to the observer. In this
case, the real number of ammonia sources should be larger than the
detected number at larger distances to the observer. The mean distance
of the sources to the observer, on the other hand, increases as the
galactocentric distance decreases, as can be seen in Fig. 4, for
this reason we expect .
![[FIGURE]](img51.gif) |
Fig. 4. Distribution of the mean temperature of the detected ammonia sources (dots) and mean distance to the observer (triangles) as a function of the distance to the galactic center.
|
Under the assumptions listed at the beginning of this section, the
brightness temperature reflects the NH3 column density and,
after corrections for the gradient in the abundance of this molecule
with the galactocentric distance, it also represents the H2
column density. Therefore, the distribution
indicates that the fraction of
molecular clouds associated to HII regions decrease as the
H2 column density increases. Since the actual sizes of the
molecular clouds are not known, we cannot convert H2 column
density to mass, but it is possible that the distribution of
with T is a consequence of
some relation , where M is the mass
of the cloud. Relations of this type are found in the distribution of
clumps in Oph (Motte et al. 1998)
and also in other molecular clouds (Loren 1989, Blitz 1993), with
varying between 1 and 2.5.
Another quantity which can be calculated once the distribution of
sources with T is known is the mean brightness temperature:
![[EQUATION]](img58.gif)
where we have assumed . Using
Eq. (2) we obtain:
![[EQUATION]](img60.gif)
and
![[EQUATION]](img61.gif)
The maximum observed temperature is 1.5 K for NGC6334, the minimum
temperature can be taken as 0.1 K, three times the rms of the
observations, using these values and
in Eq. (9) we obtain
In Fig. 4 we present the calculated mean temperature for four
interval bins in galactocentric distance. The three points at the
largest distance to the Galactic Center define a line with slope 0.26,
in agreement with the value derived in Eq. (9), however, the
point closest to the Center falls well below this line. This behavior
would be expected if the assumption that the sources cover completely
the antenna beam is valid up to distances to the observer of about 3
kpc, as can also be seen from the figure. At this distance the antenna
beam will correspond to a linear size of about 3.5 pc. Actual sizes of
molecular clouds associated with HII regions, obtained by mapping, are
available for only a few sources. For other ammonia sources, specially
those observed towards compact HII regions, only one position was
studied and the size of the region calculated from the filling factor,
under the assumption of LTE. However, as mentioned before, Stutzki and
Winnewisser (1985) showed that a large fraction of warm ammonia
sources present anomalous intensities in the satellite lines, probably
caused by the superposition of small dense clouds in non LTE. The
filling factor, in this case, is interpreted as the ratio between the
solid angle occupied by all the clumps and the solid angle of the
antenna beam. This interpretation is different from the usual
assumption that the size of the molecular cloud is the product of the
antenna beam size and the filling factor. Therefore, molecular clouds
can be larger than the beam size and still have filling factors
smaller than one.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: March 21, 2000
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |