![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 356, L66-L70 (2000) 4. Bi-modal LiBeB productionThe vast majority of spallogenic Li, Be and B nuclei are produced
by particles of relatively low-energy, which are just the most
numerous. Now since only the SBEPs of highest energy can diffuse away
from superbubbles, through the dense shell, without losing their
energy through coulombian losses, the LiBeB production induced by the
SBEPs outside the superbubbles is very small. Any isolated supernova
exploding in the `unperturbed' ISM (i.e. far from SBs) then enriches
the ambient gas with freshly synthesized C and O without being
accompanied by an equivallent production of LiBeB. The gas around such
a SN can thus show very low L/M ratios, unless another mechanism
produces LiBeB in the same region. Several processes can be invoked
for that purpose. First, the standard GCRN: the shocks created by
isolated SNe accelerate CRs from the unperturbed ISM (mostly protons
and
If this were the only production mechanism of light elements in the unperturbed ISM, one should expect to find extremely low L/M ratios at very low Z. However, we have shown in Parizot & Drury (1999a,b) that most of the metal-free CRs accelerated at the shock of an isolated SN are actually confined inside the supernova remnant (SNR) during the Sedov-like phase, and interact there with freshly ejected C and O nuclei to produce significant amounts of Be and B. This means that isolated SNe also produce LiBeB locally, where it is easily mixed with the fresh CNO. We evaluated the production efficiency for this mechanism to be about one order of magnitude lower than in superbubbles. The resulting L/M ratios are then about 10 to 30 times below the most common values (obtained with the SB model), and should be considered as a lower limit for L/M ratios in halo stars (provided no depletion occurs after star formation, as can be checked from the Li abundance). This is represented by the lower horizontal line in Fig. 2. At very low metallicity, we thus predict a bimodal production of Be and B, with SBEPs leading to a high efficiency mechanism (any of the SB models) and CRs accelerated at the shock of isolated SNe leading to a low efficiency mechanism (SNR model, Parizot & Drury, 1999a,b). This results in a bimodal distribution of the L/M ratios, as schematically shown in Fig. 3 (left). Note that the relative weight of the two `modes' depends on the fraction of stars exploding in OB associations, and the fraction of stars forming far from SBs. At higher metallicity, when the Be and B production by GCRN exceeds that of the SNR model, the distance between the peaks gets smaller, and it is hard to distinguish between bimodality and the scatter described in the previous section. This is shown in Fig. 3 (right).
The ideal picture described above would be correct if there were no
mixing between the gas processed inside SBs (or their shells) and the
general ISM. In practice, this is only true during the first few
We also wish to draw attention on the recent report by Boesgaard et
al. (1999c) on two pairs of stars, (HD 84927, BD +203603) and (HD
94028, HD 219617), having the same stellar parameters (which limit the
risk of systematic errors in the derivation of the elemental
abundances) but Be abundances differing by as much as 0.3 and
0.6 dex, respectively, at metallicities around [Fe/H]
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000 Online publication: April 17, 2000 ![]() |