 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 356, 1010-1022 (2000)
3. Results and discussion
3.1. C-type shocks
Timmermann (1998) presented profiles for 3 models of C-type shocks
with speed = 20
km s-1 and initial densities
=
and cm-3. In Fig. 2,
we compare his and our corresponding results in the case of
=
cm-3, for which the initial magnetic induction B = 100
µG; the initial ortho:para ratio is 1. Collisional
dissociation of H2 by a non-reactive ion I+ of
mass 32 was included in both
calculations, adopting the rate coefficient of Draine et al. (1983)
(see Sect. 2.1).
![[FIGURE]](img59.gif) |
Fig. 2. A comparison of the shock profiles of (left) Timmermann (1998, model 2) and (right) ourselves, using the same rate coefficient for dissociation by a non-reactive ion I+ of mass 32 . The temperature of the neutral fluid and the ortho:para-H2 ratio are plotted in the upper panels, the densities of selected species in the lower panels.
|
Whilst the shock widths and temperature profiles are similar in the
two calculations shown in Fig. 2, important differences also
emerge. The increase in the atomic hydrogen density, owing to
dissociation of H2 in the shock wave, is much smaller in
our model than in that of Timmermann and, consequently, the maximum
ortho:para ratio that is attained is also less. The behaviour of the
ion (H+, ) densities is
very different. Timmermann's calculation shows an initial rise in
n(H+) and
n( ), presumably due to the
compression of the ionized fluid, which precedes that of the neutrals.
In our model, this rise is quenched, even reversed, by chemical
reactions which remove ions, as discussed in Sect. 2 above. The
total density of ions in our shock model is only
cm-3, an order of
magnitude smaller than the density
alone in Timmermann's model. Perhaps the most puzzling aspect of
Timmermann's results is the rapid rise in the density of H+
as the gas cools towards its postshock temperature; this increase
coincides with the compression of the neutrals. We know of no reason
for such an increase in the H+ density: cosmic ray
ionization occurs on a distance scale which is orders of magnitude
larger. We tentatively conclude that the treatment, in Timmermann's
model, of the chemistry of these ions is incomplete or incorrect. The
higher ion abundance, calculated by Timmermann, has direct and
indirect (through the rate of formation of H by ion impact
dissociation of H2) consequences for the ortho:para ratio;
the net effect is an overestimation of the ortho:para ratio in
Timmermann's calculations.
3.1.2. A grid of models
In what follows, we continue to include the dissociation of
H2 by ions, but only real and chemically active ions are
considered and the rate coefficient is derived assuming a constant
cross section, as described in Sect. 2. Models of C-type shocks
were calculated for
-
initial densities = n(H) +
2n(H2) = ,
, ,
cm-3,
-
initial ortho:para ratios =
0.01,1.0, 2.0, 3.0,
-
shock speeds = 10, 20, 30, 40
km s-1 (except for =
cm-3, when
= 10, 15, 20, 25, 30
km s-1).
We obtain the initial magnetic induction from
B(µG) = .
The left-hand column of Fig. 3 shows the variations of the
temperature of the neutrals, , of the
fractional abundance of H,
n(H)/ , and of the local
ortho:para ratio, n(ortho)/n(para), through C-type shock
waves with 10
40
km s-1, and, initially,
=
cm-3 and ortho:para = 0.01. We note that allowance for the
chemical reactivity of the ions has important consequences, notably
for the width of the shock wave (see Pineau des Forêts et al.
1997). The reduction in the density of ions, owing to their removal in
chemical reactions, results in a wider shock wave; the increase in
width is a factor of 2 for =
cm-3 and
= 20 km s-1 (compare
Fig. 3a with right panel of Fig. 2).
![[FIGURE]](img103.gif) |
Fig. 3a-h. The variation of (a ) the temperature of the neutrals, (K), (b ) the fractional abundance of H, / , and (c ) the ortho:para ratio through C-type shock waves with 10 40 km s-1; initially, = cm-3, B = 100 µG, and the ortho:para ratio is 0.01. (d ) The rates (s-1) of the processes which contribute to the dissociation of H2, and production of H, in a C-type shock with = 40 km s-1, and, initially, = cm-3 and B = 100 µG. (e ) Temperature profiles, (f ) fractional abundance of H, n(H)/ , and (g ) n(ortho)/n(para) for J-type shocks with speeds 10 25 km s-1; the initial gas density is = cm-3, the initial ortho:para ratio is 0.01, and B = 10 µG. (h ) The rates (s-1) of the processes which contribute to the dissociation of H2, and production of H, in a J-type shock in which = 25 km s-1, and, initially, = cm-3 and B = 10 µG.
|
Fig. 3d compares, for =
cm-3 and
= 40 km s-1, the
rates (in s-1) of the various processes which contribute to
the dissociation of H2: collisional dissociation by
electrons, by hydrogen atoms and molecules, and by ions; chemical
dissociation, including neutral-neutral reactions of the type
O(H2, H)OH, OH(H2, H)H2 O. At this
high shock (and hence ion-neutral drift) speed, the rate of
dissociation by ion impact exceeds the rate of production of H by
chemical conversion of oxygen into water. The dissociation rate is of
the order of s-1 over
much of the shock width. Estimating the flow time of the neutrals
through the shock wave as
cm/ cm s-1
3 s,
the fraction of H2 that is dissociated is given
approximately by s/
s =
3 ; this estimate is confirmed by the
numerical results (Fig. 3b). At a lower shock speed,
= 20 km s-1,
collisional dissociation by ions becomes insignificant, and
neutral-neutral reactions initiated by O turn out to be the most
important; the resulting fraction of atomic H is of order
. For
= 10 km s-1, the temperature remains too low to
activate these reactions and the atomic H fraction does not increase
from its initial (preshock) value of
(Table 1).
3.1.3. Conversion of para- to ortho-H2
The activation energy of approximately 5000 K for the reaction
of H with H2 makes the efficiency of para to ortho
conversion strongly dependent on the maximum neutral temperature
reached in the shock wave, . As shown
in Fig. 3c, for =
cm-3, conversion is
negligible for = 10
km s-1 ( = 200 K),
only partial at 20 km s-1
( = 700 K), and complete for
km s-1
(
1300 K). We have found that these threshold temperatures
(700 K to start conversion, and 1300 K to reach the
statistical value of 3) are valid across the whole grid of models,
irrespective of the initial values of the ortho:para ratio and
.
The weak dependence on can be
understood as follows. The number of para to ortho conversion per
H2 molecule across the shock is given by the integral of
![[FORMULA]](img116.gif)
over the shock profile, where is the
reaction rate coefficient at temperature T (averaged over all
H2 levels). We have seen that, even allowing for the
contribution of collisional dissociation by ions, the fraction of
atomic H in C-type shocks remains always close to
(Fig. 3b). Since
is approximately constant on the hot
plateau, where conversion takes place, n(H) can be considered
to be roughly proportional to for
all the models. The flow time, on the other hand, is found to be
inversely proportional to (see
Table 2). The dependence on
cancels, leaving as the main
parameter controlling para to ortho conversion in our models. The weak
dependence on is due to the sudden
onset of conversion, once the temperature is sufficiently close to the
reaction barrier.
3.1.4. Electronic tables
We provide in Table 2a-f (electronic form only, available at
CDS and from
http://ccp7.dur.ac.uk/ ) an
extensive set of parameters, derived from our grid of C-type shock
models. Table 3 contains a subset of the results in
Table 2a-b, by way of illustration, for
=
cm-3 and = 0.01 and
1.
Table 3. Shock structure, H2 ortho:para ratios, and line fluxes (in erg cm-2 s-1 sr-1) for = cm-3.
Column contents: is the shock speed (in km s-1); L is the width of the region in which 50 K; t is the time required for the neutral fluid to traverse the width of the shock wave; n(H)/ is the maximum H abundance in the shock wave; is the maximum temperature of the neutrals; is the mean of the excitation temperature for levels to 8; is the mean of the excitation temperature for levels to 11; is n(ortho)/n(para), and is N(ortho)/N(para), evaluated at the rear of the shock wave (where has fallen to 50 K); is the mean of the empirical ortho:para ratio, derived for levels to 8; is the mean of the empirical ortho:para ratio, derived for levels to 11; is the percentage of the initial mechanical energy flux ( /2) radiated in all the lines of H2 included in the model; is the percentage of the initial mechanical energy flux radiated in the transitions 0-0 S(2) to S(7); S(J) is the flux radiated in the H2 0-0 S(J) line in a direction perpendicular to the shock surface, in erg cm-2 s-1 sr-1 (values below are replaced by ...). In all columns, parentheses indicate powers of ten.
Table 2a lists for each model: the shock width L (of
the region in which
50 K); flow time t (time
required for the neutral fluid to traverse the width of the shock
wave); (50 K) (postshock density
at = 50 K);
(maximum ion-neutral drift velocity
in the shock wave);
[n(H)/ ]max;
(maximum temperature of the
neutrals); (mean of the excitation
temperature , defined by Eq. 6,
for levels to 8);
(mean of the excitation temperature
, defined by Eq. 6, for levels
to 11);
n(ortho)/n(para) and N(ortho)/N(para) at
the rear of the shock wave (where
has fallen to 50 K); (mean of the
empirical ortho:para ratio, derived from Eq. 5, for levels
to 8);
(mean of the empirical ortho:para
ratio, derived from Eq. 5, for levels
to 11).
Table 2b lists for each model: the initial mechanical energy
flux, /2 (in erg cm-2
s-1); (percentage of the
initial mechanical energy flux radiated in all the lines of
H2 included in the model);
(percentage of the initial
mechanical energy flux radiated in the transitions 0-0 S(2) to S(7));
flux radiated in each of the H2 lines: 0-0 S(0) to S(11);
1-0 S(0) to S(11); and 2-1 S(1) (in erg cm-2 s-1
sr-1).
Table 2c contains, for all of our models with
=
cm-3, the column densities of each of the 49 levels of
H2, divided by their statistical weights and sorted by
increasing energy above the ground
level.
Tables 2d,e,f are the same as Table 2c but for
= ,
, and
cm-3.
3.2. J-type shocks
It is well known that C-type shocks occur only if the transverse
magnetic field strength in the preshock gas exceeds a critical value
(cf. Draine 1980). In practice, the magnetic field strength in
specific objects is often unknown and must be derived from
energy-equipartition arguments, which lead to density-scaling
relations of the type used above. However, even if the initial
magnetic field strength is sufficiently high for a C-type shock wave
to obtain in steady-state, time-dependent calculations (Chièze
et al. 1998) show that an initially J-type shock evolves through a
mixed C- and J-type structure to ultimately become C-type.
Furthermore, the time of evolution to steady state can be comparable
with or exceed the estimated lifetimes of molecular outflows. Given
the uncertainty in the initial value of the transverse component of
the magnetic induction, and the fact that the shock will have a J-type
component at early times, we have additionally studied the variation
of the ortho:para-H2 ratio in J-type shocks.
3.2.1. Shock structure and H2 emission
A grid of J-type shock models was computed for
-
=
, ,
,
cm-3,
-
= 0.01, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0,
-
= 5, 10, 15, 20, 25
km s-1.
A small but finite initial magnetic induction was assumed,
B(µG) =
0.1[ (cm-3)] ,
which is an order of magnitude smaller than adopted in Sect. 3.1
above for the same initial gas density. The other initial conditions
were the same as in the corresponding C-type shock model. When
computing the J-type models, it was assumed that the neutral and
ionized fluids were fully coupled.
In the right-hand column of Fig. 3 are plotted the temperature
profile, fractional abundance of H,
n(H)/ , and
n(ortho)/n(para) for J-type shocks with a range of shock
speeds, 10
25
km s-1. As for the C-type shocks in Fig. 3, the
initial gas density is =
cm-3, and the initial
ortho:para ratio is 0.01.
Both C- and J-type shocks involve an initial rise in the
temperature, followed by radiative cooling and compression of the gas
towards its postshock state. However, the quasi-discontinuous
temperature rise associated with a J-type shock ensures that the
maximum temperature is attained adiabatically, and it is consequently
much higher than in a C-type shock of the same speed. Thus, whilst a
C-type shock with = 20
km s-1 gives rise to a maximum temperature
= 800 K of the neutral gas (see
Fig. 3a), =
K in the corresponding J-type shock
(Fig. 3e).
The high maximum temperatures in J-type shocks give rise to much
more rapid radiative cooling, by rovibrational transitions of
molecular hydrogen, than in the corresponding C-type shocks. Thus, the
width of a J-type shock with = 20
km s-1 and initial =
cm-3 is of the order of
cm, as compared with
cm for a C-type shock of the same
speed. The corresponding times of flow through the shocks are 13 yr
and 4000 yr, respectively. Evidently, H2 emission lines of
high excitation energy are much more intense, relative to those of low
excitation energy, under J-type shock conditions.
The treatment of radiative cooling is crucial when determining the
structure of and H2 line emission from the postshock flow.
Chang & Martin (1991) made predictions of H2 line
intensities in J-type shocks, considering H2 cooling only.
With the same parameters as in their model 10k5
(
cm-3,
K,
= 15 km s-1), and with B = 45 µG,
we find that H2 cooling dominates down to about only
1000 K. The approximation of neglecting coolants other than
H2 is, therefore, inadequate when the preshock gas density
is so high. We have also compared our results for
=
cm-3 and = 10
km s-1 with those of Burton et al. (1992) obtained
with the J-type shock code of Hollenbach & McKee (1989). We find
good agreement (within 10%) for the 0-0 S(1) to S(3) lines but predict
3 times more flux in the 1-0 S(1) line. The intensities of the pure
rotational lines agree because the populations of the low rotational
levels are close to thermal equilibrium.
3.2.2. Dissociation of H2 and para to ortho conversion
The process of para to ortho conversion is more rapid in J- than in
C-type shocks, owing to the higher postshock temperatures. However,
the time available for conversion is much shorter, typically by a
factor of 100, owing to the rapid cooling in the dense postshock flow.
As a result, we find that para to ortho conversion does not occur for
= 5 km s-1
( = 1000 K) and that it remains
incomplete in J-shocks where the maximum temperature is below
K, i.e.
km s-1 (Fig. 3g).
When the postshock temperature exceeds
K, the rate coefficients for
dissociation of H2 in H and H2 collisions become
sufficiently large for these processes to dominate the dissociation of
molecular hydrogen (Fig. 3h). Indeed, for
=
cm-3 and = 25
km s-1, n(H)/
0.4 in the postshock gas
(Fig. 3f). The high abundance of atomic H then ensures that
conversion of para- to ortho-H2 proceeds rapidly and that
the statistical value of 3 is attained. Similar results were obtained
for the other values of that we
investigated, with complete conversion requiring
K, i.e.
15
km s-1.
3.2.3. Electronic tables
We provide in Table 4a-f (electronic form only, available at
CDS and from
http://ccp7.dur.ac.uk/) an
extensive set of parameters, derived from our grid of J-type shock
models, in the same format as Tables 2a-f for C-type shocks. By
way of illustration, Table 3 contains a subset of
Table 4a-b, for =
cm-3 and
= 0.01 and 1.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: April 17, 2000
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |