![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 357, 572-580 (2000) 4. ResultsA system of coupled, stiff, first-order differential equations
describing the chemistry has been solved between the inner radius of
the dust shell Rinner and Rinner +
5 The results after integration between Rinner and
Rinner + 5
We can identify three density regimes over which the dominant
formation and destruction processes vary: the low density range
(ngas= Table 5. Dominant formation (top line) and destruction (bottom line) processes in the chemical model. Formation - RA: radiative association; AD: e- associative detachment; RXXX: reaction No. XXX in Appendix A; CE: charge exchange - Destruction - PP: photo-processes (dissociation, ionisation); R: recombination; He+: He+ attack; C+: C+ attack; O: O attack; RXXX: reaction No. XXX in Appendix A 4.1. Carbon-bearing speciesAs illustrated in Fig. 3, small carbon chains are extremely
sensitive to the gas density as all the chain abundances vary by
At low gas densities, the dominant formation processes for C2, the carbon chains and the dominant C-bearing molecular species (CO, CS) are radiative association (RA) reactions, such as
Destruction of the chains, CO and CS results from photo-processes (dissociation and ionisation) at low densities while He+ attack as
starts to play a role as the density increases. In the intermediate density range, a new type of formation channel appears, that is, associative detachment (AD) reactions such as
where C- is formed from radiative recombination reactions. However, radiative association reactions still represent the dominant formation mechanism for the chains and the dominant carbon-bearing species. Destruction is now essentially governed by He+ attack and C+ attack such as
while photo-processes become less important. For still larger densities, formation occurs mainly via radiative association reactions and to a less extent, associative detachment processes. As for the destruction of molecules, a new destructive channel becomes dominant and involves the attack by atomic oxygen, i.e.,
while He+ and C+ attacks become less important. This result illustrates the shift in the chemistry as the gas density increases and the fact that ions recombine more efficiently at higher densities. Once the neutral gas phase dominates, the destruction processes for molecules and their ions arise from atomic oxygen attack. Because we have ignored CO self-shielding in the treatment of our photo-processes, more atomic oxygen not locked up in CO is available in the flow, leading to more effective destruction of carbon chains. Apart from C2, the final abunbances of small carbon clusters and their ions are never large even at high gas number densities, due to the fact that the formation processes involved are slow radiative association and associative detachment reactions. Carbon monoxide is the dominant molecular species to form at high densities, but unlike late-type, carbon stars, it does not lock up the entire oxygen in this carbon-rich environment. The wind is still rich in free He, C and O atoms and their ions, and the observational evidence for the absence of other types of dust, such as oxides, is puzzling. We shall discuss this point in Sect. 5. 4.2. Silicon and sulphur speciesSeveral silicon and sulphur-bearing species are considered, in
particular molecules involved in the process of SiC cluster
condensation. The formation and destruction processes for silicon and
sulphur species are summarised in Table 5 and are similar to
those involved in the formation of carbon species, except for a few
specific reactions at play in the formation of CS, SiO or SO. Results
on chemical abundances are presented in Fig. 4 and indicate that
the dominant species are CS, SiO, SO and SiC and that the trend
displayed by carbon-bearing molecules, that is, increasing abundances
with increasing gas number densities, is also followed by these
molecules. However, the final abundances are quite low at large
densities, especially for the species which could act as intermediates
in the nucleation of silicon carbide (e.g., SiC2,
SiC 4.3. Temperature and opacity variationsVariation of the gas temperature at the inner dust shell was also
considered for the various density regimes to check if the chemistry
was very sensitive to temperature. Results are presented in
Fig. 5 for the intermediate density range and the dominant
chemical species in the wind. Apart from C2, CS and SO, the
atomic and molecular abundances do not show much variation with
temperature. This is mainly due to the fact that the destruction and
formation processes for these species are similar at low and high gas
temperatures and that their chemical rates do not depend strongly on
temperature. The situation is different for C2, CS and SO
which show higher abundances at low temperatures. For C2,
the destruction processes remain the same over the temperature range
considered, but an extra formation channel (associative detachment)
adds up to radiative association reactions at low temperatures and
increases the total net formation rate. For CS and SO, the formation
processes are very different at high and low temperatures. At high
temperatures, RA reactions dominate while neutral-neutral reactions
are more important at low T. As the latter channels are usually
characterized by faster chemical rates than RA processes, this results
in a greater net formation rate at low temperatures. These results
hold at lower and higher gas densities than
Results induced by considering an arbitrary wind opacity in the UV are also presented in Fig. 5. All molecular species show increasing abundances with increasing wind opacity and this is understood quite simply by the fact that the He+ abundance drops of two orders of magnitude as the opacity becomes larger. In the intermediate density region, the main destruction processes are He+ and C+ attacks (see Table 5) and photo-processes, and a higher wind opacity results in less ionisation of helium and carbon and lower photo-rates. Therefore, molecular destruction is hindered by the opacity of the wind.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000 Online publication: June 5, 2000 ![]() |