SpringerLink
Forum Springer Astron. Astrophys.
Forum Whats New Search Orders


Astron. Astrophys. 357, 1105-1114 (2000)

Previous Section Next Section Title Page Table of Contents

2. Observations

We report on selected solar flares observed in Metsähovi at 22 and 37 GHz (Urpo et al. 1992). These examples reveal various time behaviour of the flares. In accordance with our approach we divide the time profiles into three groups.

(i) Set of pulses. Fig. 2a shows the burst of 1991 June 11, 0915 UT revealing pulses with growing and then decreasing amplitude. The modulation magnitude was not so large as compared to the event of 1991 March 22, 0903 UT (Fig. 2b). The event in Fig. 2b consists of three peaks and quite similar to that observed by Kane et al. (1983). From the analysis of Metsähovi data at 22 and 37 GHz we found a lot of such a type of events having 3-6 pulses with time scales of 3-80 s, and with maximum flux between 7 and 100 sfu.

[FIGURE] Fig. 2a and b. The time profiles of mm-wave emission consisting from several pulses. a  1991 June 11, 0915 UT (22 GHz), b  1991 March 22, 0903 UT (37 GHz)

(ii) Single pulse events. Fig. 3 presents an example of a single pulse event of May 9, 1991 0953 UT. The flux of mm-wave emission grows up to 50 sfu during a few seconds and than shows an e-folding decay with time scales of about ten seconds. It is important to note that no fine structure was observed at least within the time resolution of 0.05 s. Several events of the same character with maximum flux of [FORMULA] sfu and decay time [FORMULA] min were observed also at 22 and 37 GHz.

[FIGURE] Fig. 3. Example of flare emission at 37 GHz with time resolution 0.05 s in the form of single pulse (event of May 9, 1991, 0953 UT)

(iii) Pulses before, after, and during the explosive phase. Time profile of the 37 GHz emission of the event of May 11, 1991 is shown in Fig. 4a (Urpo et al. 1992). The burst starts with six [FORMULA] s pulses of enhanced amplitude at pre-flash phase and then evolves into explosive (non-exponential) energy release. The emission flux reaches its maximum value of about 530 sfu four seconds later. After maximum a long-term decay lasts for about 40 min. This event is very similar to the flare of 2 November 1991, reported by Lee & Wang (1998) with one difference: the time scale of pulsations in the event of 2 November 1991 at pre-flash phase is about two minutes (about one order of magnitude longer). Fig. 4b presents the explosive rise phase followed by pulsations in the event of May 9, 1991 1053 UT. The pulsation time scale varies from 15 to 30 s. It is seen from Fig. 4c that both pulsation and explosive phases co-exist simultaneously.

[FIGURE] Fig. 4. a The time profile of 37 GHz emission on 1991 May 11, 1321 UT with enhanced pulses at pre-flash phase followed by the explosive phase. b  The event of May 9, 1991, 1053 UT with explosive rise phase followed. by pulses. c  The event of August 28, 1990, 0846 UT with pulses superimposed upon explosive profile.

Unfortunately, we have no direct evidence for a simple loop origin of the events presented in Figs. 2-5 because no microwave and X-ray maps with high spatial resolution were available for these events. Nevertheless, except for numerous evidences of simple loop flares (see, for example, the review by Sakai & de Jager (1996) and Fig. 1) there is an additional indirect argument in favor of a single loop origin. The bursts under consideration (except the event of May 11, 1991) have comparatively short duration and are rather weak, [FORMULA] sfu as it should be for simple-loop compact flares (Priest 1985). Two-loop and multi-loop flares produce more powerful radio emission.

Previous Section Next Section Title Page Table of Contents

© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000

Online publication: June 5, 2000
helpdesk.link@springer.de