![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 357, 1115-1122 (2000) 7. Results7.1.
|
![]() | Fig. 11. Blue part of the spectrum of meteor O 27471 at different times. Individual spectra have been shifted vertically for clarity. The lines mentioned in the text are identified. The features marked by asterisk are due to an interfering star trail. |
The second change is the increasing strength of calcium lines
relatively to other lines toward lower heights. Calcium is
underabundant in the radiating gas due to incomplete evaporation but
the evaporation efficiency increases at lower heights. Also this
effect is common in meteors of similar velocity
(Borovika 1993; Ceplecha et
al. 1998).
In summary, in this spectrum we did not find any evidences which could explain the changes of the shape-density coefficient K. The changes of K are not represented in the radiation of the meteor, at least in the visual range and above our sensitivity limit.
The large K at the start of almost all examined cases with precise observational data calls for explanation. There are several possibilities.
All the effect is from changing bulk density (outer layers composed of low density material.
Changing head cross-section e.g. due to rotation.
The air density is widely and systematically different from the used model (CIRA 72)
Eq. (1) is not valid and needs some large additional term at the trajectory start
Explanation 1 should be recognizable in spectral records. Even
if we are not definitive with our limited spectral analysis, we feel
this explanation of so large values of K very improbable.
Explanation 2 may be well right, but some of the K values
are so large that only an extremely flat shape could explain them, and
we are not much inclined to assume that these cases correspond to
meteoroids thin as a sheet of paper. Something which is in favor of
explanation 2: periodic changes of decelerations and of K
at the early parts of the trajectories may well represent rotation of
the body. We found periods between 2 and 4 rotations per second for
different events. Explanation 3 seems very improbable. One needs
changes of the air density against the CIRA 72 model by a factor of
the order of 10 on a height differences of the order of 10 km.
All these explanations 1 to 3 may act together. But if we
take into account that large values of K are typical
explanation of almost all differences from the assumption of constant
K and , and if we draw our
attention to anomalous cases with positive values of
during an extensive part of the
trajectory (e.g. Fig. 10), we are inclined to accept
explanation 4 as the most probable.
Revision of the basic differential equations is not in the scope of this paper, but we feel that some hints on what is omitted in Eq. (1) are necessary. It should be a rather large additional term, having occasionally about the same value as the existing term at the beginning of trajectories. Omitted gravity term is insignificant in this sense for all examined cases. In this respect some authors in the past mentioned reverse rocket effect (Levin 1961; Bronshten 1983). However, there is another possibility: a meteoroid penetrating through the ionospheric layers is electrically charged (in addition to its original interplanetary charge) and then interferes with much larger volumes of the atmosphere than it would be in case of only aerodynamic drag, and interferes also with the atmospheric electrical charges alternatively decelerating or accelerating the meteoric body.
This problem adds more uncertainty to results on individual meteoroids. Many times in the past we mentioned that meteoroids in the atmosphere behave very individually. It has no sense to speak about an average meteoroid (inclusive meteor showers). Now we are adding another "individualism", the state of the ionospheric layers and electric charge of the meteoroid, which could change atmospheric meteoroid trajectory so much like do the differences among them. In any case we want to devote more attention to this problem in some of our future studies. Very precise trajectories observed, immediate state of the entire atmosphere from all aspects, and good luck for anomalous events to be recorded, this is all we need to proceed to some more general insight into problems of meteoroid interaction with the atmosphere.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: June 5, 2000
helpdesk.link@springer.de