 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 358, 521-534 (2000)
4. The galactic disk traced by embedded OB stars and by molecular clouds
4.1. Centroid and thickness of the disk
The formation of OB stars in the galactic disk is distributed in a
layer coincident but thinner than that of molecular clouds as traced
by CO. Fig. 9 shows the radial variations of the centroid
and the thickness (HWHM)
of the embedded massive star layer
for the southern and northern Galaxy, compared with their
H2 counterparts. The molecular gas parameters were derived
from the Columbia U. - U. Chile deep CO surveys of the I and IV
galactic quadrants (Paper I; Cohen et al. 1986); from surveys of
the Carina region by Grabelsky et al. (1987) and of the III galactic
quadrant by May et al. (1988, 1993), analyzed by Casassus (1995); and
from a composite CO dataset of the II quadrant analyzed by
Digel (1991).
![[FIGURE]](img152.gif) |
Fig. 9. The azimuthally averaged thickness (HWHM) (top) and the centroid (bottom) of the massive star formation layer (solid line), as a function of R, are compared to those of H2 (dashed line), as derived from the Columbia U. - U. Chile deep CO surveys of the Galaxy
|
The average thickness of the embedded massive star distribution,
within the solar circle, is 73 pc (FWHM), compared with 118 pc (FWHM)
for the layer of molecular gas traced by CO (Tables 6 and 7). It
has been shown by Dame & Thaddeus (1994), however, that there are
possibly two components for the molecular gas layer: a thin one, with
a FWHM of 80 pc, similar to the thickness of the young massive stars
layer derived here, and a thick and diffuse one, with a FWHM in excess
of 500 pc.
The warping of the disk outside the solar circle, as traced by the
centroid of both the massive star
formation and the H2 layer, appears to be more pronounced
in the northern Galaxy than in the south. A tentative explanation is
that the spiral arms outside the solar circle can be traced within a
larger longitude range in the south than in the north; we may be
therefore averaging out the warp in azimuth in the south because of
the large longitude span (Casassus 1995; May et al. 1997). For
example, it is apparent from Fig. 2 than there are many more sources
detected outside the solar circle in the IV quadrant than in the I
quadrant of the Galaxy.
The flaring of the molecular gas layer in the outer Galaxy is
evidenced by both the molecular and by the embedded massive star
distribution in the south. However, while the thickness of the massive
star layer in the northern outer Galaxy grows like that in the south,
the mean thickness of the molecular hydrogen layer in the northern
outer Galaxy is only about half that of its southern counterpart. A
possible explanation is that while the longitude coverage of our
survey of embedded massive stars is equally complete north and south,
the composite CO data set of the northern outer Galaxy analyzed
by Digel (1991) only covers the region
, compared to the complete longitude
coverage of the III and IV quadrant CO surveys used by Casassus (1995)
in his analysis. Therefore the azimuthal range for the average is much
larger in the south than in the north; averaging the galactic warp
over large scales would increase the mean thickness derived for the
molecular gas layer.
4.2. Embedded OB stars, FIR surface luminosity, and H2 surface density
The mean radial distribution for the 748 massive star forming
regions analyzed here (Fig. 3) is maximum at
, falls sharply toward the galactic
center, and decays exponentially toward the outer Galaxy (Fig. 10). Of
these regions, 492 ( ) are found at
, and 332
( ) at
, the region of the molecular
annulus (Paper I). The fraction of 44% grows to
when the contamination of the
sample by low luminosity regions in the solar neighborhood is
considered (Sect. 3.5). A similar annular radial dependence for the
number surface density of OB associations in the inner Galaxy has been
found by Mc Kee & Williams (1997) using an older compilation of
radio H II regions (Smith et al. 1978) binned in rings 2 kpc wide.
Such annular shape was found also by Kent et al. (1994) for the NIR
emission attributed to M giants, based on large scale satellite
observations.
![[FIGURE]](img164.gif) |
Fig. 10. From top to bottom: azimuthally averaged face-on FIR surface luminosity, as a function of R, originated by embedded massive stars (solid line) for the northern Galaxy ( ); the southern Galaxy ( ); and the whole Galaxy, compared with molecular hydrogen face-on surface density (short dashed line), as derived from the Columbia U. - U. Chile deep CO surveys of the Galaxy. Data are uncorrected for the expansion velocity field at the 3-kpc arm locus (Paper I)
|
The FIR surface luminosity produced by embedded massive stars for
the Galaxy as a whole is even more restricted to the molecular annulus
than their number density. Integration over the whole galactic disk
yields a total FIR luminosity of .
Within the solar circle the FIR luminosity is
, 81% of the total, and for
, the FIR luminosity is
, representing
of the total. The radial dependance
of the FIR surface luminosity produced by embedded massive stars has
also a narrower maximum than the H2 surface density. A
gaussian fit to the azimuthally averaged FIR surface luminosity,
within the solar circle, yields a FWHM of
(Table 4),
% the FWHM obtained for the
H2 radial distribution,
(Table 5). Down from the maximum, toward the outer Galaxy, the
FIR surface luminosity decreases, as a function of R, much faster than
the H2 surface density, with an exponential scale length of
, compared to
for the H2.
![[TABLE]](img175.gif)
Table 4. Azimuthally averaged face-on FIR surface luminosity produced by regions of massive star formation
![[TABLE]](img176.gif)
Table 5. Azimuthally averaged face-on surface density of molecular hydrogen
![[TABLE]](img179.gif)
Table 6. Separate axisymmetric models for the FIR luminosity from UC H II regions: - 1.0
![[TABLE]](img182.gif)
Table 7. Separate axisymmetric models for the H2 distribution as traced by CO emission: - 1.0
The ratio of FIR luminosity produced by embedded OB stars to
H2 mass, which may be used as a large scale tracer of
massive star formation efficiency, is not constant throughout the
Galaxy and has also a peak at .
Integrating the H2 surface density, as traced by the
Columbia U. - U. de Chile CO surveys of the Galaxy, we compute a total
H2 mass of for
, and of
for
. For all the CO data we have used
main beam antenna temperatures ,
with a main beam efficiency of 0.82 (Paper I); CO to
H2 conversion factor
derived using the same CO data and EGRET gamma-ray observations by
Hunter et al. (1997); a distance of the Sun to the galactic center of
; and no correction for helium
abundance. The average FIR luminosity to H2 mass ratio,
within the solar circle, is ; for
the ratio grows to
; and for
there is a maximum of
. Outside the solar circle, for
, the derived mean ratio is
; this figure can be considered as
an upper limit, since the conversion factor
has been argued to be from 2 to 4
times larger in the outer Galaxy (May et al. 1997).
The radial distribution for the complete set of OB star formation
candidate sites from WC89 has been derived by Comerón &
Torra (1996), assuming axial symmetry but without the use of any
kinematic information. Our present results do not confirm the peak in
massive star formation that Comerón & Torra (1996) find at
kpc, although it is fair to say
that our analysis is oriented to the galactic disk, and that we have
therefore cut out the region within
of the galactic center. However, we detect only 1 source in the range
, where we sampled 50% of the
face-on area, while for their result to hold there should be more than
50 OB star forming regions in the area we sampled.
4.3. Large scale asymmetries within the solar circle
Among the most striking results of the early CO surveys of the
Galaxy were the large scale north-south deviations from axial symmetry
obtained from separate fits of axisymmetric models to the CO data
(Robinson et al. 1983; Cohen et al. 1985). The maximum molecular gas
face-on surface density in the molecular annulus is a factor of 1.47
higher in the I galactic quadrant than in the IV quadrant
(Paper I), where the maximum is really a plateau extending
roughly for . Because massive star
formation occurs mostly in giant molecular clouds, it would be
expected to find a similar trend in the FIR surface luminosity
produced by embedded massive stars. What we have found, however, is an
enhancement of massive star formation in the southern Galaxy
within the solar circle.
A fraction of 58% of the FIR luminosity produced by embedded
massive stars, within the solar circle, comes from the southern Galaxy
- while the total H2 mass, as traced by CO, is about the
same north and south. A possible explanation of such result could be
that massive stars in the I galactic quadrant are preferentially in
the far side of the Galaxy, and/or that in the IV quadrant they are
preferentially in the near side. Thus, by assuming axial symmetry in
our models, we could be artificially inflating the luminosity in the
south or lowering it in the north. However, because the FIR luminous
dense molecular gas cores we have sampled in the CS(2-1) are well
correlated in space and velocity with the population of giant
molecular clouds in the Galaxy as traced by CO (Bronfman 1992), the
same asymmetry should be found in the distribution of molecular gas.
But what we find here for the FIR surface luminosity distribution is
an asymmetry from north to south which is opposite in sign to that of
the molecular gas surface density.
Massive star formation per unit H2 mass, as a
consequence, is higher in the IV than in the I galactic quadrant. The
average FIR luminosity to H2 mass ratio in the southern
Galaxy, for , is
; for
grows to 0.28; and for
we find a galactic maximum of
. In comparison, the corresponding
numbers in the northern Galaxy are ,
, and
. The enhancement of massive star
formation at in the southern Galaxy
appears to be correlated with the position of the Norma spiral arm
tangent, where a large fraction of the most luminous sources in the
sample are found. Massive star formation enhancements of this kind
have been observed in the spiral arms of external galaxies, like for
instance in M51 (Nakai et al. 1994), although there the starburst
seems to be driven by a companion galaxy. In our own galaxy such burst
could be driven by a bar - that would have to be large enough to
produce an effect at almost 5 kpc from the galactic center.
4.4. The contribution of embedded OB stars to the FIR luminosity of GMCs in the Galaxy
Preliminary results of our ongoing analysis of GMCs harbouring
embedded UC H II regions in the southern Galaxy show a fairly linear
relation between the FIR luminosity from embedded OB stars and the
virial mass of the clouds, with a mean FIR luminosity to mass ratio of
(Bronfman et al. 2000). This ratio
grows to , for GMCs associated with
bright H II regions, when the FIR luminosity is computed from IRAS
sky-flux images (Mooney & Solomon 1988). Therefore we suggest a
lower limit of for the contribution
of embedded OB stars to the total FIR emission from GMCs undergoing
massive star formation. Our estimate can be considered as a lower
limit because: (a) some embedded OB stars are likely to illuminate
dust regions so large in angular size that they would not be
identified as IRAS point sources and therefore not included in our
sample and, (b) if identified, some of the source FIR flux may have
been lost because of the background subtraction.
The ratio of FIR luminosity produced by embedded massive stars to
virial mass for GMCs in the southern Galaxy,
, is similar to the FIR surface
luminosity to H2 surface density ratio found at the peak of
the southern distribution of embedded OB stars,
. Therefore it is possible to
suggest that most GMCs in that region of the Galaxy are presently
forming massive stars, and it appears reasonable to use such value as
a standard scale to evaluate the massive star formation efficiency per
unit H2 mass in the rest of the Galaxy relative to its
maximum value. It is worth keeping in mind, though, that here we are
averaging the H2 surface density over large areas of the
Galaxy, several kpc2 in size. Therefore our maximum value
for the FIR luminosity to H2 mass ratio will be much
smaller than that obtained when computed only for the neighborhood of
a massive star forming region, with a typical FIR luminosity of
and a virial mass of
(Plume et al. 1997)
The total FIR luminosity of
derived here for the embedded massive star layer, for
, represents
of the FIR luminosity assigned to
the H2 layer by Bloemen et al. (1990) from IRAS data,
, and
of the FIR luminosity derived from
DIRBE data
( ) by Sodrosky et al. (1997).
Because in their respective analyses they consider all the FIR
emission from the galactic plane, while here we compute only the FIR
emission produced by dust fairly close to the heating stars, a strict
lower limit of can be set for the
contribution of embedded massive stars to the total FIR output from
molecular gas within the solar circle.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: June 8, 2000
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |