 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 358, L29-L32 (2000)
4. Discussion
The results of our analysis indicate that, at least for
observations of class and
(which have many similar traits), we
have a way to estimate the disk accretion rate during an instability
event, when the inner disk radius grows from its "minimum" value of
30 km and slowly moves back to it.
Although we know that the measured value is only an underestimate, it
is natural to associate this minimum value with the innermost stable
orbit. It is interesting to compare these values, or at least their
ranking, with the rate of ejection in the jets. As we mentioned above,
the accretion rate measured through this procedure is associated to
matter flowing through the observable inner edge of a
geometrically thin accretion disk. Some of the accreting gas must
leave the accretion disk to form the jet, unless it is entirely
composed of pairs generated by photon-photon interactions. and how
this happens is basically unknown. There are two extreme
possibilities: either matter ejected in the jet leaves the accretion
disk before entering the innermost regions, thus not contributing to
our measured disk accretion rate (case 1), or it leaves it after
passing through our measured inner disk radius, in which case it is a
fraction of the accretion rate we measure (case 2). In case 1, if the
fraction of matter in the jet is constant and the total external
accretion rate (disk+jet) is variable, we expect a positive
correlation between disk accretion rate (from X rays) and disk
ejection rate (from the infrared). If the fraction is variable and the
total is constant, these quantities should be anticorrelated. In case
2, if the fraction of matter in the jet is constant, we expect a
positive correlation, while the constant total is in this case not
possible as the total would be what we measure, which is not observed
to be constant. If both fraction and total vary, the situation is
complicated. Of course, there is a spectrum of intermediate
possibilities, where the jet production is connected to the inner
region of the disk in a way that would not allow to dissociate the two
processes. With the paucity of existing data, we limit ourselves to
the extreme cases. Notice that measuring an anti-correlation would be
an indication against case 2.
Table 1 also lists an estimate of the mass ejection rate
. This is based upon an equipartition
calculation for one proton for each electron, negligible kinetic
energy associated with the repeated ejection events, and an average
over the repetition period of the oscillations. Note that there is a
systematic uncertainty in these numbers due to lack of knowledge of
the intrinsic electron spectrum which corresponds to the observed
flat-spectrum radio-infrared emission. However, unless the spectral
form of the distribution changes between observations then the effect
is the same for all data sets and the ranking remains the same. Of
course we may be observing synchrotron emission from a pair plasma
with no baryonic content, in which case the amount of power being
supplied to the jet, , makes more
useful comparison with the accretion rate; this value is also listed
in Table 1. For more details of how these quantities are
calculated, see Fender & Pooley (2000). Either way, there appears
to be an anticorrelation between accretion rate inferred from
the X-ray spectral fits and the outflow rate of mass/energy in the
jet. The low number of points in our sample prevents us from saying
something more firm. Notice that an anticorrelation is also suggested
by the strong flat-spectrum radio emission observed during long
`plateau' intervals; periods when Belloni et al. (2000) estimate that
the accretion rate must be very low. We also note that the faint
infrared flares reported by Eikenberry et al. (2000) do not appear to
be different from the others in other respects, as the X-ray light
curves are too undersampled to allow a detailed correlation.
If future observations show that disk accretion rate and jet
ejection rate are indeed anti-correlated, the following scenario could
be speculated. A fraction of the accreting gas leaves the
geometrically thin accretion disk before reaching the inner edge (from
which it would fall into the black hole) and goes into a hot corona.
The details are not known, but our results indicate that this does not
happen after the inner edge. As the disk refills, the inner radius
moves inwards, more soft photons from the disk reach the corona, which
causes its Comptonization emission to soften gradually. At the end of
the instability period, when the disk is refilled down to the
innermost stable orbit, this "reservoir" of hot gas is expelled to
produce the jet, resulting in the observed infrared / mm / radio
emission, causing the power-law component to steepen dramatically and
to cause the sudden change in the X-ray count rate and spectral
parameters. Notice that, as we remarked earlier, the distributions of
points in Fig. 2 are flatter than the expected curve for a constant
disk accretion rate according to a standard thin disk: in other words,
as the inner disk radius decreases, the disk accretion rate seems to
decrease as well. This could mean that the process that re-routes some
gas from the disk to the corona becomes more efficient closer to the
central object, and therefore the fraction of matter going into the
corona increases as the disk refills.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: June 8, 2000
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |