Astron. Astrophys. 358, 793-811 (2000)
8. Summary and conclusions
We have shown unambiguous evidence of external variability
in the CLASS gravitational lens B1600+434. The difference between the
8.5-GHz VLA light curves of the two lensed images shows external
variability at the 14.6- confidence
level. The modulation indices of the short-term variability are 2.8%
for image A and 1.6% for image B. The difference light curve
has an rms scatter of 2.8%, indicating that the short-term variability
in both light curves is mostly of external origin (Sect. 2).
We have investigated two plausible sources of this external
variability: (i) scattering by the ionized component of the Galactic
interstellar medium (ISM) and (ii) microlensing by massive compact
objects in the bulge/disk and halo of the lens galaxy.
Based on the `standard' theory of scintillation (e.g. Narayan 1992;
Rickett et al. 1995) there should be a considerable increase in the
modulation-index with wavelength (Sects. 3 and 7). From simultaneous
WSRT 1.4 and 5-GHz observations we find, however, that
=1.2% and
=3.7% (Table 1), which is a
considerable decrease. Scintillation theory predicts
=9.0% for
=3.7% (Sect. 7). If the 1.4 and
5-GHz short-term variability is intrinsic, it is hard to reconcile
with the fact that in 1998 the VLA 8.5-GHz light curves were dominated
by external variability during the full eight months of monitoring
(Sect. 2), although it can not be fully excluded yet. Moreover, from
microlensing simulations, we expect that
=1.2-2.4% if
(Fig. 11), based on constraints on
the source structure and mass function of compact objects found from
the VLA 8.5-GHz light curves (Sects. 4, 5 and 7). This range agrees
remarkably well with the observed modulation index
=1.2% at 21 cm.
Supplementary to this argument, the difference in modulation-index
between the lensed images would, in the case of scintillation, argue
for either a very different Galactic ionized ISM
(![[FORMULA]](img282.gif) 3.1;
Sect. 3.1-2) towards the lensed images or a different image size
(![[FORMULA]](img284.gif) 1.75;
Sect. 3.2), although the latter might result from scatter-broadening.
Furthermore, the longer variability time scales at 8.5 GHz
( 1 day; Figs. 1-2) are also difficult
to explain in terms of scintillation, as well as the absence of
variability with short time scales in several 12 h WSRT observations
at 5 GHz (Koopmans et al. in prep.).
However, the strongest argument against scintillation remains the
dominant presence of short-term external variability at 8.5 GHz in
1998, combined with the fact that in 1999 significant short-term
variability is seen at 5 GHz, but almost none at 1.4 GHz.
Under the microlensing hypothesis, we find a consistent, although
not unique set of jet-component parameters. A core plus a
single-jet-component with a size of 2-5 µas, containing
5-11% of the flux density and moving superluminally with
9![[FORMULA]](img2.gif) ![[FORMULA]](img181.gif) 26,
can explain the modulation-index and variability time scale in both
lensed images (Sects. 4-5). For image A we find a significantly
higher average mass of compact objects
( 0.5
), compared with those near
image B. A much lower mass of compact object would result in a
finer magnification pattern and thus in less variability. If
image B is scatter-broadened, its microlensing modulation-index
is reduced, which might change the lower-limit on the compact object
mass.
If one, based on the evidence gathered thus far, accepts that the
1.4, 5 and 8.5-GHz short-term variability in B1600+434-A and B is
dominated by microlensing, the profound consequence is that the
dark-matter halo at 6 kpc above the
plane of the disk-galaxy lens in B1600+434 is partly filled with
massive compact objects. New WSRT, VLA and VLBI multi-frequency data
is being obtained at the moment, which combined with a more
comprehensive statistical analysis should provide us with refined
constraints on the mass function of compact objects and the source
structure (Koopmans et al. in prep.).
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: June 20, 2000
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |