![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 358, 910-922 (2000) 6. Liller 1The globular cluster Liller 1 is a highly reddened cluster near the
galactic center ( No source is detected in the cluster in our ROSAT HRI observation
of the globular cluster Liller 1. Near the cluster center, no
circle with radius of 5" contains more than 4 photons. For an expected
number of 10 photons, the probability of getting 4 or fewer photons is
less than 4%. We thus take 10 as the
2- Asai et al. (1996) report the detection on 1993 Aug 27 with ASCA of
a source near Liller 1. For a powerlaw with photon index 2, absorbed
by a column The ROSAT HRI detects a source with a countrate of 1
cts ksec-1 about 4´ from the cluster center. The
statistical error in the position of this source is about 1"; the
actual error is dominated by the error in the bore sight correction,
which is about 5". The ROSAT source is not compatible with the center
of Liller 1, and also not compatible with the position of the Rapid
Burster as determined with Einstein (see Table 7). The position
of the ROSAT source coincides within the bore sight uncertainty with
the O4 III(f) star HD 317889 (Vijapurkar & Drilling 1993). The
star is in the Tycho Catalogue as TYC 7380 976 1. From the observed
magnitude and colours ( Table 7. Positions of the center of Liller 1 (GC, Picard & Johnston 1995) its core radius (Trager et al. 1993) and the positions of X-ray sources detected near it, viz. the Rapid Burster (RB, Hertz & Grindlay 1983), a dim source detected with ASCA (A, Asai et al. 1996) and a dim source detected with the ROSAT HRI (R, this paper). The position of the O star HD 317889 is also given. The final columns gives the errors in the positions. We can interpret the ROSAT and ASCA observations in two ways. The first and most likely is that ASCA indeed did detect the Rapid Burster in quiescence, or another low-luminosity source in Liller 1; and that ROSAT observed when this source had a lower flux level. In fact, variation of transients in their quiescent state is common (e.g. Campana et al. 1997). The star detected with ROSAT in this case is not detected with ASCA, presumably because its spectrum is too soft. The second interpretation is that ASCA in fact detected the star also detected with ROSAT, and not the quiescent counterpart of the Rapid Burster. The position of the ROSAT source is marginally compatible with that of the ASCA source; its countrate is exactly that predicted on the basis of the ASCA source. Dr. Asai has kindly communicated a new determination of the position of the X-ray source detected by ASCA, using new calibrations to improve the accuracy. This position, listed in Table 7, excludes the ROSAT source as a possible counterpart, and thus confirms that ASCA indeed detected a source in the cluster. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000 Online publication: June 20, 2000 ![]() |