Astron. Astrophys. 358, 956-992 (2000)
3. The radiative acceleration
In this section, we introduce our notation and give a brief summary of
basic expressions for the radiative acceleration. For detailed
derivations, we refer the reader to the references cited in the
following.
The general expression for radiative acceleration reads
![[EQUATION]](img74.gif)
with the specific intensity and
the mass-absorption coefficient for
line (continuum) radiation. denotes
the direction vector which points
from the considered location into
the direction of radiation and, thus, is anti-parallel to the
direction vector introduced in
Fig. 1, i.e. .
3.1. The continuum acceleration
As discussed above, we assume an optically thin continuum in
the wind and neglect any diffuse radiation, i.e., the irradiation
origins at the stellar surface and the corresponding intensity
experiences no attenuation between
the star and . Thus, the intensity
is determined solely by the physical
conditions at the location where the ray pointing from
to the stellar surface intercepts
the latter for the first time.
In winds from early-type hot stars, the continuum radiative
acceleration essentially arises from Thomson acceleration
and is a vector quantity given by
(cf. C095, Eq. (43))
![[EQUATION]](img82.gif)
with the stellar luminosity,
the electron scattering opacity,
the Thomson cross-section and
the electron number density.
denotes the solid angle subtended by
the stellar disk, and is the local
polar angle confining
(cf. Fig. 1). The electron density
follows from
![[EQUATION]](img88.gif)
with the helium abundance,
the proton rest mass and
the number of free electrons per He
atom (O-stars: , B-stars:
, A-stars:
).
Note that the Thomson acceleration is a vector quantity and may
have a non-radial component
in polar direction (if the stellar surface deviates from spherical
symmetry or/and varies with
co-latitude, see below), whereas the azimuthal component
vanishes due to symmetry about the
rotational axis. In this case, both the polar and the radial component
of the Thomson acceleration become a function of co-latitude
. Especially the latter implies some
consequences for rapidly rotating supergiants with gravity darkening,
as discussed in Sect. 3.3).
denotes the effective temperature
at the stellar surface defined via the emerging frequency-integrated
flux (see Sect. 3.3),
![[EQUATION]](img100.gif)
3.2. The line acceleration
By means of the frequency-integrated line opacity
![[EQUATION]](img102.gif)
with the gf-value,
the occupation numbers and
statistical weights of the lower (l) and upper (u)
levels, e the elementary charge and
the electron rest mass, we define
the line-strength
![[EQUATION]](img107.gif)
with the line transition
frequency and
![[FORMULA]](img108.gif)
the Doppler-width. denotes the
thermal velocity.
As the continuum acceleration, the line acceleration is a vector
quantity (cf. C095, Eq. (44)), defined in the Sobolev approximation as
the sum over an ensemble of lines:
![[EQUATION]](img112.gif)
with the optical depth in
Sobolev
approximation 1,
![[EQUATION]](img115.gif)
denotes the generalized depth
parameter depending on the absolute value of the directional velocity
derivative , which, for spherical
symmetry, collapses to the depth parameter introduced by CAK,
.
According to the findings by CAK, Abbott (1982) and Puls et al.
(2000), the number distribution of spectral lines
with frequency
and line-strength
can be approximated by a power-law
line-strength distribution function
![[EQUATION]](img124.gif)
with and a frequency
distribution independent of
line strength. The quantity
normally varies with location .
The additional exponential factor with maximum line-strength
has been introduced by Owocki et
al. (1988) in order to prevent the number of (strong) lines from
becoming smaller than unity. Note that this parameterization does not
consider line-overlaps and multi-line effects, i.e., we restrict
ourselves to the single-line scattering case where the photons
interact with the ions in such a way as if each line would be well
separated from its neighbour, independently of line density.
Employing this line distribution function makes the transition
possible from the sum in Eq. (15) to an integral. After some algebra,
we obtain with Eq. (16) for (cf.
C095) and assuming
![[EQUATION]](img130.gif)
In this expression, is still
considered as a global parameter constant throughout the
wind , i.e., independent of the actual local physical conditions.
We will drop this assumption below (see Sect. 6.3).
is the frequency-integrated
stellar intensity, and we have neglected the dependence of
on direction . In principle, the
polar surface temperature gradient owing to gravity darkening may have
an actual impact, if the intensities at the poles, respectively at the
equator, have their maxima in different frequency ranges with a
different number of contributing lines. However, we accept this
approximation, in particular with respect to the line force
parameterization proposed in Sect. 6.
To account for the dependence of the ionization structure on
particle density and dilution of the stellar radiation field, Abbott
(1982) introduced an additional factor which represents the largest
part of variation of ,
![[EQUATION]](img133.gif)
with the spherical
dilution factor (the generalization for arbitrary stellar surfaces is
given by Eq. (27)),
![[EQUATION]](img135.gif)
Introducing now the force-multiplier parameter
(cf. CAK, Puls et al. 2000)
![[EQUATION]](img136.gif)
the line force finally reads
![[EQUATION]](img137.gif)
Like , also
(essentially
) and
are considered as global
parameters so far. We will drop this approximation in
Sect. 6.3.
Finally, we need the expression for the directional derivative
. Due to symmetry about the polar
axis, this quantity simplifies to the expression given by C095
(Eqs. (41/42)). 2
For a spherically-symmetric wind from a uniformly bright
stellar surface, the line acceleration given by Eq. (22) reads
(cf. CAK, PPK, Friend & Abbott 1986)
![[EQUATION]](img142.gif)
denotes the
force-multiplier , given by the ratio of radial line to Thomson
acceleration
![[EQUATION]](img144.gif)
This quantity is usually parameterized by means of the
force-multiplier parameters ,
,
(for an alternative parameterization, see Gayley 1995):
![[EQUATION]](img145.gif)
With the knowledge of ,
,
as a function of effective temperature (and metallicity), the stellar
mass-loss rate and the terminal velocity can be easily calculated for
every evolutionary state of the star, e.g., by means of the analytical
formulae provided by Kudritzki et al. (1989).
3.3. Impact of non-radial line forces and gravity darkening on the wind dynamics
The influence of non-radial line force components and gravity
darkening on the radiative line and the wind dynamics has been
investigated in detail by C095, Owocki et al. (1996, 1997) and,
with some refinements, by Petrenz (1999). In all these investigations,
the line force has been parameterized by global parameters
, ,
adopted from 1-D non-LTE
calculations. In the following, we only summarize the main
results.
As a consequence of asymmetries in the local directional derivative of
the velocity field, the line acceleration has non-radial components
along the polar and
along the azimuthal direction,
which imply following effects: Firstly, the polar component
scales with the polar gradient of
the radial velocity field . The
latter is negative close to the star, where
is of the same order of magnitude
as the inertial (centrifugal and coriolis) accelerations
( ) and becomes decisive for the wind
dynamics. As a result of the balance of these accelerations, the disk
formation is inhibited and the wind material is redistributed towards
the polar regions with maximum (absolute) polar velocities
,
whereas the radial component
stabilizes the flow against gravity (with
).
The density contrast between the equatorial and the polar wind
ranges in between 2... 8, and
typical terminal velocities are
and for B-(O-)star winds.
The azimuthal component scales
with the radial gradient of the azimuthal velocity field
. If the latter is smaller
than (i.e., for any rotation law
with increasing with r
smaller than for rigid body rotation),
becomes negative and spins down
the wind . In the equatorial plane, where the maximum effects
occur, is diminished by up to
, in comparison with an angular
momentum conservation law (for an analytical discussion of the
spin-down effect, see Gayley & Owocki 2000).
In comparison to a non-rotating star with an uniformly bright
surface, a star with gravity darkening is expected to show a higher
(lower) mass-loss over the poles (at the equator) owing to the
enhanced (diminished) radiative flux. Typical quantitative effects on
the surface properties of rotating stars owing to gravity darkening
become clear from the data listed in Table 1 /2.
![[TABLE]](img184.gif)
Table 1. Model grid: Stellar and wind parameters. : effective temperature for = 0; : Eddington- ; : normal gravity at the pole; : escape velocity for spherical stellar surface; : critical velocity for spherical stellar surface; : critical velocity for a-spherical stellar surface (given by PP96, Eq. (20)). Velocities in , and solar helium abundance assumed for all models. Bold: Reference model B30-30.
Isolating the pure effect of gravity darkening (still accounting
for the inertial acceleration terms, however assuming only a radial
line force) yields, again for constant force-multiplier parameters, a
slightly oblate wind structure with a moderately compressed disk in
the equatorial plane. The density contrast
3 is much smaller than in the pure WCD model
(
), and terminal velocities of order
, and
are found for typical B-star
parameters.
If one additionally accounts for the non-radial line force
components, finally a prolate wind morphology results, with
density contrasts of order 0.2 ...
0.5.
For supergiants with considerable Eddington-luminosity, gravity
darkening has an additional impact on the wind dynamics via Thomson
acceleration , which approximately
scales with the fourth power of the mean radiation field temperature
and, consequently, is more (less) effective over the poles (in the
equatorial plane) than in the wind of a uniformly bright star. This
behaviour induces an even stronger concentration of wind material over
the poles, with , where for a wind
with purely radial 1-D Thomson acceleration, this ratio would be only
.
In view of the studies performed so far and their specific
shortcomings (especially the use of globally defined force-multiplier
parameters neglecting the 2-D situation, in particular if gravity
darkening is accounted for), we will concentrate on the B-star domain
( K) in our following
investigations, and comment on hotter winds only when necessary.
Briefly, the reasons for this strategy are:
-
In the considered temperature range, the reaction of the ionization
equilibrium on small variations of
(as function of , if gravity
darkening is accounted for) is at maximum. Thus, also the effects
resulting from a consistent 2-D NLTE treatment should be at maximum in
this domain. Note that for O-star winds the variation of ionization
structure with temperature is much weaker, and the assumption of
constant force-multiplier parameters may be much better justified
there.
-
The generalization of our results to cases of higher mass-loss will
allow for a future discussion concerning the formation of B[e] star
disks, one of the most prominent manifestations of the inter-relation
between wind, rotation and (2-D) radiative driving, at least if one
follows the presently favoured scenario (cf. Lamers & Pauldrach
1991, Lamers et al. 1999, however also Owocki et al. 1997for the
counter-acting rôle of gravity darkening).
-
Finally, all prior investigations resulting in detailed
(numerical) models have concentrated on the B-star regime, as a
consequence of the work by BC, who suggested the wind-compression
scenario as one possible explanation for the Be-star phenomenon. In
order to compare our findings with those more simpler, however
well-documented approaches, and to investigate the importance of a
consistent description, an inspection of this parameter range is
inevitable anyway.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: June 20, 2000
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |