Astron. Astrophys. 359, 1107-1110 (2000)
2. Outline of the model
In our model the nebula is regarded as a sphere of radius
, expanding at a constant rate. A
continuous supply of new magnetic energy and particles is provided by
the central pulsar, whose energy output per unit time can be written
as
![[EQUATION]](img5.gif)
Both new particles and new magnetic flux are injected into the
nebula within a spherical layer at a distance
from the central pulsar. We shall
assume that the injection region has zero extension, although very
likely this is an oversimplification.
We assume that the particles' velocity distribution is isotropic
and that each particle emits essentially at its characteristic
frequency: , where
is a
constant, , and E and
are the particle's energy and pitch
angle, respectively. Under these assumptions the nebular synchrotron
emissivity becomes
![[EQUATION]](img11.gif)
with a constant and
representing the particles' spectral
and spatial density at time t. The integral represents the
average over particles' pitch angles.
As stated before, we regard the magnetic field as spatially
constant, therefore, in our model, both the spatial and spectral
characteristics of the nebular synchrotron emission are directly
related to the particle spatial and spectral distribution,
.
is related to the injected
particles' spectrum through the particles' number conservation
law:
![[EQUATION]](img14.gif)
with J being the number of newly injected particles per unit
time and energy interval and and
being, respectively, the initial
energy and injection time of a given particle. The last term in
Eq. (3) represents the jacobian of the transformation
.
Apart from knowledge of the injected spectrum, in order to
calculate from this equation,
knowledge of the particles' age ( )
and initial energy ( ) as functions of
their present position (r) and energy (E) is needed.
We consider the energy evolution of each particle due to adiabatic
and synchrotron losses:
![[EQUATION]](img19.gif)
Once the magnetic field and the
fluid bulk velocity are known at
each time, Eq. (4) can be integrated to determine
.
The determination of the time dependence of the magnetic field
strength B is straightforward under our assumptions of time
constancy of the nebular expansion rate and spatial constancy of
B itself. Following PS, we relate B to the nebular
content of magnetic energy :
=8
/ ,
with representing the confining
volume for the magnetic field. Then we write the time evolution of
due to expansion losses and the
decreasing pulsar input:
![[EQUATION]](img29.gif)
Integration of Eq. (5), where is
a constant, yields the magnetic field strength at each time (see, for
instance, PS).
Knowing , and further assuming
that the magnetic field is largely azimuthal,
, we can use the flux freezing
condition,
![[EQUATION]](img33.gif)
as an equation for the fluid bulk velocity
, which we assume to be radial:
. Integrating Eq. (6) with the
boundary condition that the fluid velocity field matches the expansion
velocity of the nebula at its outer edge
( ), we find:
![[EQUATION]](img36.gif)
The velocity field starts at at a
fraction of the speed of light of order
( ,
see below) and then it decreases roughly as
to match the nebular expansion
velocity at R.
Eq. (7) can also be written as
![[EQUATION]](img40.gif)
which yields, in its integral form:
![[EQUATION]](img41.gif)
This last equation simply states that the magnetic flux injected
into the nebula during the time interval
, with
being the time at which a particle
that at time t is at r was born, is all contained
between and r. Taking
from Eq. (9), we have got the
relation needed to connect the particles' position at each time to
their age.
Presently what is left to determine, before being able to calculate
as a function of the injected
spectrum, is the evolution of the particles' energy from initial to
present value. Introducing the expression found for
into Eq. (4), we obtain:
![[EQUATION]](img43.gif)
We integrate Eq. (10) after replacing
with its time average. We take this
to be 2/3, which is equivalent to state that each particle during its
synchrotron lifetime experiences all the possible velocity
orientations with respect to the magnetic field with the same
probability. Obviously, we expect this approximation to work better
the longer a particle lives, hence the smaller its initial energy is.
Nevertheless we apply it to particles of all energies and finally find
the expression for :
![[EQUATION]](img46.gif)
with
![[EQUATION]](img47.gif)
The meaning of the energy is
apparent: it represents the maximum possible energy for particles that
at time t reside at r. Substituting
with
, Eq. (11) also defines the maximum
radial distance from which we expect
emission to come for a given frequency.
Inserting our findings into Eq. (3) we are finally able to relate
to the injected particle spectrum.
Concerning the latter some assumptions are necessary. Assuming that
the injected electron spectrum is described by a single power law,
synchrotron aging can account for just one break in the emission
spectrum, while observation shows that in the case of the Crab Nebula
there is another break between the optical and the X-rays; this break
must be intrinsic to the injection mechanism. Then we allow for a
particle energy spectrum with two different slopes in two different
energy ranges, namely:
![[EQUATION]](img52.gif)
For simplicity, we assume all the energy cuts to be time
independent and the ratio between
and to remain constant. Since we
have assumed that a constant fraction
of the pulsar's energy outflow goes
into feeding the magnetic field, the remaining
will be used for accelerating
particles, and then the constraint on the total slowing-down power
converted into particles,
![[EQUATION]](img56.gif)
implies
![[EQUATION]](img57.gif)
Finally we have for the spectral and spatial distribution of
particles across the nebula:
![[EQUATION]](img58.gif)
with
![[EQUATION]](img59.gif)
where the energies ,
and
are the evolved minimum, maximum and
intrinsic break energy at radius r, respectively, and can be
calculated as functions of ,
and
by means of Eq. (11).
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: July 13, 2000
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |