SpringerLink
Forum Springer Astron. Astrophys.
Forum Whats New Search Orders


Astron. Astrophys. 360, 539-548 (2000)

Previous Section Next Section Title Page Table of Contents

4. Size, mass, and stellar content

In order to determine the size, centre, and stellar content of Cyg OB2, radial star density profiles have been extracted from the 2MASS data by counting the number of stars intrinsically brighter than [FORMULA] in concentric radial annuli around an assumed centre, divided by the annuli surface. Geometrical corrections have been applied for the outer annuli that partially fall outside the rectangular survey region. The profiles were fitted by a King law (King 1962)

[EQUATION]

on top of a constant to determine the core radius [FORMULA], the tidal radius [FORMULA], and the field star density. By searching the central position that minimises the radial extent of the profile the centre of Cyg OB2 has been determined to [FORMULA] and [FORMULA]. The corresponding density profile is shown in Fig. 6. The central stellar density reaches 4.5 stars arcmin-2 above the field star density, and drops to [FORMULA] at a radius of [FORMULA], resulting in a half light radius of [FORMULA] pc at a distance of 1.7 kpc.

[FIGURE] Fig. 6. Radial star density distribution for stars earlier than spectral type F3V (solid) and only OB type stars (dotted). The crosses present the observed stellar densities while the lines are fitted King profiles. An additional background star density was subtracted prior to the analysis in order to remove a small gradient ([FORMULA]) in the field star density. For the F3V sample, the zero point corresponds to a field star density of 3.1 stars arcmin-2 while for the OB star sample the zero point amounts to 0.8 stars arcmin-2.

Best fitting King parameters for the profile are [FORMULA] and [FORMULA], leading to a concentration parameter [FORMULA] of 0.5. The reduced [FORMULA] of the fit is only 10.9, indicating that the King law is not a very accurate description of the radial density profile. Indeed, there is no physical reason to believe that Cyg OB2 should follow a King profile. The basic aim of using King profiles was the estimation of the field star density, and comparison with Fig. 6 convinces that at least this goal was reached.

By integrating the radial profile after subtraction of the fitted field star density, the total number of association stars with [FORMULA] (corresponding to spectral types of F3V and earlier) amounts to [FORMULA]. The error (as all following error quotations) includes a possible systematic uncertainty from the field star subtraction. This systematic uncertainty was estimated by applying different methods for the extraction of the association stars, such as analysing star density profiles along constant Right Ascension or declination, estimating the field star density from a circular region around the association, or by performing the analysis without removing the gradient in the field star density distribution.

Selecting only K magnitudes brighter than [FORMULA] limits the sample to stars intrinsically brighter than [FORMULA], corresponding roughly to spectral type B9V and earlier. Repeating the radial density profile analysis for this limited sample allows the determination of the total number of OB stars in Cyg OB2 to [FORMULA]. This number is at the upper end of the range quoted by RLP (300 - 3000), confirming their suggestion that many of the highly reddened stars in the DSS survey are indeed OB stars. Further, restricting [FORMULA], by requiring [FORMULA], selects only O stars from the PSC, resulting in a total number of [FORMULA] objects. In their survey, Massey & Thompson (1991)find 40 O stars within a central field of 0.35 degrees squared of the Cyg OB2 association. Integrating over the same region in the 2MASS data gives [FORMULA] O stars, demonstrating that the present analysis is in excellent agreement with the Massey & Thompson observations. Hence, the large number of O stars found in this analysis is mainly due to the large extent of the association, which previously was missed due to the high extinction in the area.

Taking an initial mass of 1.5 [FORMULA] for a F3V star (Schmidt-Kaler 1982), and assuming the slope [FORMULA] of the initial mass function (IMF) 2 to be comprised between -1.1 and -1.7, the number of association stars converts into a total stellar mass of [FORMULA] [FORMULA] above 1.5 [FORMULA]. Extrapolation of the IMF to lower masses using the prescription of Kroupa et al. (1993)results in a total association mass of [FORMULA] [FORMULA], where the boundaries correspond to a lower mass cut-off of 1.0 and 0.08 [FORMULA], respectively. Since the actual value of the mass cut-off in Cyg OB2 is unknown, the total association mass is uncertain to within the quoted limits. However, even at the lower mass limit, Cyg OB2 would be the most massive OB association known in the Galaxy, being comparable in mass to a small globular cluster.

From the radial density profile and the total mass estimates, the central mass density of Cyg OB2 can be estimated. Assuming a total mass of [FORMULA] [FORMULA] results in a mass density of [FORMULA] [FORMULA] pc-3, where the lower value comes from the extrapolation of the best fitting King profile into the centre, and the upper value comes from the observed central stellar density. Correspondingly, the central mass density estimate for a total mass of [FORMULA] [FORMULA] amounts to [FORMULA] [FORMULA] pc-3. As before, the distance to Cyg OB2 has been assumed to 1.7 kpc.

Previous Section Next Section Title Page Table of Contents

© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000

Online publication: August 17, 2000
helpdesk.link@springer.de