Astron. Astrophys. 360, 603-616 (2000)
5. Diffusion and the mechanism
To determine the frequencies of modes of oscillation for a star
requires only that we solve the adiabatic equations. Solving the full
nonadiabatic equations of stellar oscillation allows us to calculate
the growth rates of the modes, and hence to determine which of the
modes are overstable; also, by considering the work integral we can
investigate the contributions of the different parts of the star to
the excitation and damping of the mode.
The nonadiabatic oscillation package used was generously provided
to us by W. Dziembowski and follows the procedure first described by
Dziembowski (1977). We are mainly concerned here with excitation
via the mechanism on which abundance
variations have a direct impact. We note, however, that the present
calculations lack a good modeling of the effect of convection; this
must be kept in mind in the analysis of the results.
The physics of the mechanism has
been reviewed extensively (e.g. Cox 1980; Unno et
al. 1979; Gautschy & Saio 1995). As a quick reminder,
generating pulsations in a star requires that the energy gained by an
oscillation mode over a complete cycle be larger than the energy lost.
We are then looking for a positive net work over the entire star over
one cycle. In the case of the
mechanism, the energy is transferred from the outward radiation flux
to the oscillation mode via the opacity. A mode becomes overstable by
this mechanism if the opacity profile and its derivatives have the
right features.
Following Unno et al. (1979), from the definition of the work
(W) as the variation of the kinetic energy (E) over a
cycle,
![[EQUATION]](img24.gif)
one can write
![[EQUATION]](img25.gif)
where denotes Lagrangian
perturbations. Also, is the
(angular) oscillation frequency, T is temperature,
is the mass interior to the radius
r, is the nuclear energy
generation rate, and and
are the radiative and convective
fluxes. If one neglects the contribution from the nuclear
( ) and convective terms
( ), and only keeps the perturbation
of the radiative flux ( ), one can
isolate the contribution of the
mechanism to the driving of a given mode of oscillation. To obtain a
simple estimate of this contribution to the work integral we make the
quasi-adiabatic approximation (i.e. , evaluate the work
integral by means of adiabatic eigenfunctions), and furthermore assume
that the adiabatic thermodynamic derivatives
,
and are constant. Then the work done
by the mechanism is proportional
to
![[EQUATION]](img34.gif)
where is the luminosity at
r, and ,
; thus regions where
![[EQUATION]](img38.gif)
contribute to the excitation. Local increases in the logarithmic
derivatives of are necessary and a
decrease in in partial ionization
zones of a dominant species (H or He) is helpful. It also follows that
regions where the gradients of and
are negative contribute to damping
of the pulsation. The term usually
dominates over the other term.
The numerical results reported in the text, including the growth
parameters and work integrals, are computed using the full
nonadiabatic procedure of the Dziembowski code.
In order that the excitation by the
mechanism should not be cancelled by
damping elsewhere, it is necessary that the driving region lie in the
so-called transition zone between the quasi-adiabatic and nonadiabatic
regimes; in that case, the oscillations are strongly nonadiabatic
outside the driving region, and this part of the star therefore does
not contribute to the damping, giving rise to net driving. This leads
to an approximate relation between the period
of a given mode of pulsation and the
position of the transition region in a star (Cox 1980):
![[EQUATION]](img43.gif)
here is the mass outside the
transition region, is the average
over that part of the star, being
the specific heat, and L is the luminosity.
The normalized growth rate is defined as
![[EQUATION]](img47.gif)
In this formulation, varies from
, if there is driving in the entire
star, to -1, if there is damping in the entire star. The value of zero
defines neutral stability.
Diffusion affects the mechanism
by decreasing driving from helium in favour of driving from metals. As
a consequence of Eq. (6), the pulsation period of the unstable
modes depends on the depth of the driving region. During a star's
evolution the helium ionization zone gradually shifts deeper in the
star, thereby increasing the period of the observed pulsation modes.
Additionally, as the driving in the deeper iron-peak driving region
increases while the driving due to helium decreases as a result of
diffusion, one might expect the observed pulsation periods to shift to
even longer periods. The effect of abundance variations on the opacity
profiles is discussed below for selected models (see Fig. 3).
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: August 17, 2000
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |