Astron. Astrophys. 361, L5-L8 (2000)
3. The equilibrium magnetic field configuration
We now present some asymptotic expansions for galactic dynamo
models with the nonlinearity (5). First of all, we recognize that,
because of the large parameter in
the right hand side of Eq. (5), we can take
![[EQUATION]](img71.gif)
where
![[EQUATION]](img72.gif)
Thus for
and
for
The function
is derived by Rogachevskii and
Kleeorin (2000). Note that in a more simplified model of turbulence
the function (see Field et al.
1999). We stress that the qualitative behaviour of the model does not
depend on these uncertainties in estimates for the scaling functions
and
.
Now we insert the -coefficient
given by Eq. (6) into local disc dynamo problem to obtain the
following equations:
![[EQUATION]](img80.gif)
(here ). We can then obtain the
steady-state solution of Eqs. (7) and (8). Recognizing that in
cylindrical coordinates
![[EQUATION]](img82.gif)
we obtain for fields of quadrupole symmetry (cf. Kvasz et al.,
1992)
![[EQUATION]](img83.gif)
in a steady state. The corresponding equation in kinematic theory
reads
![[EQUATION]](img84.gif)
Substituting (6) into (10) we obtain,
![[EQUATION]](img85.gif)
Using Eq. (9) we rewrite Eq. (12) in the form
![[EQUATION]](img86.gif)
For the dynamo
This assumption is justified if
, i.e.
. Eq. (13) then becomes
![[EQUATION]](img91.gif)
Note that Eq. (14) differs from Eq. (11), arising from
kinematic theory. For the specific choice of helicity profile
and negative dynamo number D,
there is an explicit steady solution, if we assume
(remember that also
, i.e. super-equipartition), of the
form
![[EQUATION]](img94.gif)
where we have restored the dimensional factor
. (Note that
for this approximate solution.) This
solution is remarkably close to the results from the naive
Ansatz or
, or the model of Moss et al. (1999).
For example, the pitch angle of the magnetic field lines is
for
and
.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: September 5, 2000
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |