![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 361, 770-780 (2000) 3. Sample of starsFor simplicity, a single, double or multiple `system' is here identified with an `entry' in the Hipparcos Catalogue (i.e. having a unique HIP number). With few exceptions, this means that resolved components within 10 arcsec of the primary are considered as a system, while more separated components are regarded as separate systems. Although this convention deviates from normal practice in double-star work, it should not bias the analysis as long as the same convention is used for the synthetic (model) catalogues as for the observed catalogue. To avoid selection effects originating from the construction of the Hipparcos Input Catalogue (Turon et al. 1992), only stars well within the original survey limits were used for this study. The limits used for constructing the survey part of the Input Catalogue depended both on galactic latitude (b) and the spectral type or colour index of the stars, and had to be based on the partially inaccurate and incomplete data available at the time. As a result these limits are somewhat diffuse and difficult to model. We have chosen to adopt a stricter (brighter) limit based on post-Hipparcos photometry, at the expense of the number of stars included. The `survey' criterion used here is where where Some statistical characteristics of the resulting sample are shown
in Table 1. Divided according to spectral type, 22% are O and B
stars, 36% A, 33% F, 8% G and 1% K and M stars. The typical
representative of the sample is an A5V star with a mass of
Table 1. Statistical characterisation of the investigated sample of Hipparcos Catalogue entries. For each quantity, the 5th, 50th and 95th percentiles are given. The absolute magnitude is computed from V and Dividing the sample into the different solution categories (Sect. 2) gave 1930 entries of type C (including 37 triple and 1 quadruple star), 572 of type G (including 144 with cubic terms), 112 of type O, 9 of type V, and 126 of type X. Counting the resolved triple and quadruple stars as 2 and 3 companions, respectively, and disregarding the VIM solutions gives the following statistics: Here N is the total sample size and
These counts should be corrected for optical doubles stars and
false detections before comparing with our model. We have used the
Tycho-2 Catalogue (Hog et al. 2000) to estimate the number of
optical doubles among the C solutions, and find that only 5 chance
stars with magnitude difference A sample of delta-mu binaries (Sect. 2.6) was identified by
comparing the proper motions in the Hipparcos Catalogue with FK5
(Fricke et al. 1988). Regional systematic errors in FK5 were
first eliminated by spline smoothing as function of right ascension
and declination. Among the 1535 FK5 stars,
Many of them are classified as G, O or X solutions in the Hipparcos Catalogue, so this sample is not independent of the ones in Eq. (4). ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000 Online publication: October 2, 2000 ![]() |