Astron. Astrophys. 361, 952-958 (2000)
2. Deriving the mass-transfer history
In order to derive the mass-transfer history of the
secondary star in AM Her, we must first derive the
mass-accretion history from the available observations at many
times and wavelengths. The bulk of the gravitational energy released
in an accreting polar is emitted in the X-ray regime, partly as
optically thick quasi-blackbody radiation from the heated white dwarf
atmosphere in regions of high local mass-flow densities, partly as
optically thin bremsstrahlung from the stand-off shock in regions of
relatively low accretion densities. In addition to the bremsstrahlung,
the hot post-shock plasma emits cyclotron radiation in the visual/IR.
Only about half of the bremsstrahlung/cyclotron emission is radiated
away directly, the other half is intercepted by the white dwarf
surface and either reflected or reprocessed into the UV range, as
evidenced by a large heated spot around the main accretion region
(Gänsicke et al. 1995,1998). At low accretion rates, one sees the
photospheric flux of the (heated) white dwarf. Finally, the accretion
stream can be a source of largely optically thin emission in the
visual/UV wavelength range.
It is clear that a dense sampling of multi-wavelength observations
of AM Her would be desirable to determine the temporal variation
of all individual accretion flux components. However, the prime
observational parameter which is available is the brightness at
optical wavelengths. The intense visual monitoring of AM Her by
the observers of the AAVSO resulted in more than 10 000
individual brightness estimates for the last 20 years. Fig. 1
shows the AAVSO data binned in 10 day intervals.
can - in principle - be derived from
Fig. 1 if the time-dependent accretion flux
can be expressed as a function of
V. In a first approximation, we neglect the emission from the
accretion stream and write
![[EQUATION]](img9.gif)
where ,
, and
are the observed soft X-ray, thermal
bremsstrahlung, and cyclotron fluxes, respectively.
is the flux of the reprocessed
emission from the heated pole cap. Gänsicke et al. (1995) have
shown that in AM Her ,
, and
are of the same order of magnitude
both during the high state and during the low state. Thus, it is
possible to estimate
![[EQUATION]](img14.gif)
from X-ray observations alone. The main uncertainty in our
estimates of is not the
approximation involved in the second term but the systematic
uncertainties in the parameters of the dominant first term in
Eq. 2, the bolometric value of the soft X-ray flux.
We have compiled values for from
the literature based on observations with ROSAT (Gänsicke et al.
1995), BeppoSAX (de Martino et al. 1998), and EXOSAT (Paerels et al.
1994). Fig. 2 shows as function
of the visual magnitude V, where the values of V for the
individual X-ray observations were obtained from the AAVSO data.
varies smoothly over a wide range in
. For
,
drops steeply as the emission of AM Her approaches that of the
underlying stellar components, indicating that accretion nearly
ceases. We approximated the
distribution with two separate linear fits to the ranges
and
.
![[FIGURE]](img25.gif) |
Fig. 2.
Correlation between the visual magnitude and the accretion flux in AM Her. Plotted as dashed lines are two linear fits for and .
|
With known, we compute the
accretion luminosity
![[EQUATION]](img27.gif)
with pc the distance of
AM Her (Gänsicke et al. 1995). The assumption of isotropic
emission may overestimate the accretion luminosity somewhat. As all
values of are orbital mean values,
this uncertainty does, however, not exceed a factor of 2, and is
probably less as we neglected the emission of the accretion
stream.
From , we finally compute
![[EQUATION]](img30.gif)
with cm the adopted white
dwarf radius, the adopted white
dwarf mass, and G the gravitational constant.
is shown in Fig. 3 (contiguous
10 day bins are connected by lines). The average value of
is ,
or .
![[FIGURE]](img40.gif) |
Fig. 3.
The mass transfer rate in AM Her as a function of time (see Fig. 1). The dashed line indicates a reasonable value for the maximum quasi-stationary mass-transfer rate: (i.e. ).
|
Hereafter, we will use to denote
either the instantaneous mass-transfer or mass-accretion rate, on the
assumption that they are effectively the same for our purposes.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: October 10, 2000
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |