 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 361, 1143-1151 (2000)
4. Discussion
We present in Fig. 3 a general view of the spatial
distribution and proper motions in galactic coordinates of the
measured PMS stars, and in Fig. 4, Fig. 5, Fig. 6 and
Fig. 7 - upper panels - zooms of the 4 main star-forming regions
studied in this work. In all these regions, a dominant orientation of
the proper motions towards smaller longitudes can be observed. This is
in large part the effect of the reflex solar motion, as can be seen in
the versus
graphs of the same regions
(Fig. 4, Fig. 5, Fig. 6 and Fig. 7 - lower
panels). Since the effect of solar motion on the star proper motion
depends on the distance of the stars, and the distances of PMS stars
are usually poorly known, we present in these figures the reflex solar
motion as a function of distance, from 50 to 200 pc. We assumed the
basic solar motion, with components U = 9 km/s (directed towards the
galactic center), V = 11 km/s, W = 6 km/s. The reflex solar motion
depends also on the direction of the stars, and since some of the
regions studied here have sizes of several degrees, we present it for
two extreme directions in each field (except for Corona Australis,
which is a small field).
![[FIGURE]](img45.gif) |
Fig. 3. Positions and proper motions of PMS stars depicted in Figs. 4 to 7 - upper panels.
|
![[FIGURE]](img55.gif) |
Fig. 4. Upper panel: Positions and proper motions of PMS stars in Chamaeleon. Lower panel: Components of proper motions of PMS stars in Chamaeleon, in galactic coordinates. The reflex solar motion is presented for two directions - (1): , and (2): , - for distances ranging from 50 pc to 200 pc, in steps of 25 pc, from left to right. The open symbols represent HAeBe stars, the filled ones T Tauri stars.
|
![[FIGURE]](img65.gif) |
Fig. 5. Upper panel: Positions and proper motions of PMS stars in Lupus. Lower panel: Same as Fig. 4 - lower panel - for Lupus. (1): , and (2): ,
|
![[FIGURE]](img75.gif) |
Fig. 6. Upper panel: Positions and proper motions of PMS stars in Upper Scorpius - Ophiuchus. Lower panel: Same as Fig. 4 - lower panel - for Upper Scorpius - Ophiuchus. (1): , and (2): ,
|
![[FIGURE]](img81.gif) |
Fig. 7. Positions and proper motions of PMS stars in Corona Australis. Lower panel: Same as Fig. 4 - lower panel - for Corona Australis. ,
|
In all groups, a number of stars are found to have proper motions
that lie well outside the average distribution. Notice that some of
these stars that can be seen in the
( ) maps (for Upper Sco, Chamaeleon
and Corona Australis) are absent from the
( ) graphs, due to the scale that we
adopted. We consider that these stars have a large probability of
being recently formed runaway stars and a possible explanation for
them is the disruption of multiple systems. We cannot exclude the
possibility of errors, like a wrong identification during the proper
motion determination process; however, note that some of the stars
with anomalous proper motions are bright and were found in several
sources (eg. HD 137727, HD 140637), which reduces the probability of
an erroneous identification.
Disregarding the runaway stars, the groups of PMS stars present
proper motion dispersions of the order of 10 mas/yr typically. This
means that in a period of about one million years, the stars would
move apart several degrees in the sky, and would look very dispersed.
We must bear in mind, however, that part of this apparent dispersion
may not be intrinsic, but due to the fact that the sun is approaching
the group. For instance, most of the PMS stars of Upper Scorpius
present negative radial velocities, while most of the stars in
Chamaeleon present positive radial ones (e.g. Gregorio-Hetem et al.
1992; Torres et al. 1995; Covino et al. 1997).
Let us now comment on the average proper motion of the stellar
groups. We already noticed that the average values are largely
explained by the reflex solar motion. However, they are not entirely
due to this effect or, in other words, intrinsic average proper motion
of the groups are detected. For instance, in the case of Lupus (our
largest sample, Fig. 5), the center of mass of the points in the
( ) graph is about (-30,-9), which
suggests mean distance of about 85 pc, if we consider only the reflex
solar motion. However, the average distance of 14 stars of this group
that have parallaxes from HIPPARCOS is 138 pc. This suggests that the
Lupus PMS stars have a mean intrinsic proper motion in the longitude
direction of about = -10 mas/yr.
The Chamaeleon group is peculiar, in that it seems to present two
distinct kinematic groups, even after excluding the runaway stars. A
group with proper motions close to about
= -40 mas/yr,
= -15 mas/yr, seems to be well
behaved. Its observed proper motion could be explained by the the
reflex solar motion, if its distance is of the order of 70 pc. And
indeed, some of the stars of this group have distances determined by
HIPPARCOS, and are not too different from this value (T Cha, 66 pc, RX
J1158.5-7754a, 86 pc, RX J1159.7-7601, 92 pc, HD 104237, 116 pc). This
group was already discussed by Terranegra et al. (1999); notice,
however, that Bertout et al. (1999) consider that the HIPPARCOS
distance of T Cha is incorrect. Another group of stars presents
positive values of , considerably
different from the reflex solar motion. Among these, only HD97300 has
parallax measured by HIPPARCOS (187 pc).
Finally, we remark that in the studied regions, no systematic
differences between the proper motions of T Tauri stars and HAeBe
stars can be observed. Our results favour the PMS nature of the
candidates HAeBe stars included in our list.
A deeper analysis of the proper motion of the groups of PMS stars,
in connection with the ages of the subgroups, will be presented in a
separate paper, where our results are compared with the models
proposed in the literature for the mechanisms that might have
triggered the star formation.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: October 10, 2000
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |