Astron. Astrophys. 362, 756-761 (2000)
5. Discussion: dynamo- and viscosity-
In Table 1 a summary is given for the signs of the resulting
MHD mean-field coefficients obtained by our turbulence model for the
two cases of rigid rotation and Kepler rotation. The first line with
positive -effect, with positive
kinetic helicity and negative current helicity (all in the upper disk
plane) is just the same as given by Brandenburg & Schmitt (1998)
for a simulation of the solar north pole. For a MHD shear flow
simulated by Brandenburg (1999) the case `Kepler' in Table 1 is
valid and there is also not even one exception from the general
agreement. The kinetic helicity in the upper disk plane for
Brandenburg's simulation is negative and the same is true in our flux
tube model. It is interesting to formulate for Kepler disks the
relation between both alphas. With (21) and (40) follows
![[EQUATION]](img95.gif)
so that the amplitude of the
dynamo- becomes
![[EQUATION]](img96.gif)
We have also used the relation
between the disk thickness and the temperature of a thin accretion
disk. The magnetic Mach number Mm can be assumed to be of order
unity.
We find the dynamo- to be a rather
small fraction of the turbulent velocity
. Ziegler & Rüdiger (2000)
find with a box simulation that the
dynamo- is of order
in units of the sound velocity. The
turbulent velocity is of the order of the sound velocity (of the
midplane) so that the -effect
approaches in units of the eddy
velocity. This is indeed smaller than the
viscosity- which in the simulations
was of order .
The dynamo- proves to be negative
in the upper disk plane and positive in the lower one. We can thus
expect a dipolar symmetry with respect to the equator for the
dynamo-maintained large-scale magnetic fields. In order to ensure
self-excitation for the magnetic fields with such a small
-effect, the eddy diffusivity of the
turbulence must be sufficiently small. As it works with uniform
magnetic fields we can not compute this coefficient with our model.
The same also holds for almost all numerical simulations so that here
it must remain open whether a magnetic dynamo really works.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: October 24, 2000
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |