![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 362, L17-L20 (2000) 2. MeasurementsHST images of NGC 6537 were obtained on 12 Sept. 1997. A total of 18 images were obtained with WFPC2 in program 6502 (B.Balick, P.I.). Most of the images are not ideal for our purpose, since they were taken with filters which include strong nebular lines. One image was taken with the filter F547M, which passes visible light containing only weak nebular lines and the nebular continuum. The exposure time was 40 seconds. Some of the other images had longer exposure times, up to 500 seconds. The results are interesting: no central star is visible in any of the images including that taken with the F547M filter. This is corraborated by Balick (private communication, 2000) who states that none of the images, including the F547M image, `show any trace of a central star'. To obtain a quantitative estimate of the upper limit to the
magnitude we have proceeded as follows. NGC 6537 has been
compared to Me2-1, which has been chosen because the two nebulae are
very similar, except that the central star of the latter nebula is
clearly seen. Me2-1 is slightly larger (diameter about 9") than the
central region of NGC 6537 where almost all the emission is
concentrated (diameter about 7"). Me2-1 has a total
H Me2-1 was measured by the WFPC2 on 23 Feb. 1994 in program 5107 (J.
Westphal,P.I.) and has been calibrated and analysed by Wolff et al.
(2000). One of the images measured was taken with an F547M filter and
is entirely equivalent to the image taken of NGC 6537, except
that the exposure time was somewhat longer: 100 seconds. The visual
magnitude of the central star was found to be 18.40, and the ratio of
the peak stellar flux in the visual to the surrounding nebular
continuum is 20. A star of this magnitude is thus easily seen. If a
star could be recognized when its peak flux is 50% of the nearby
nebular continuum, its flux would be lower than that of Me2-1 by a
factor of 40. This is 4 magnitudes, and applies for the central star
of NGC 6537 if the nebular continuum is the same as for Me2-1.
This is approximately true, since, as shown above, the
H This result could have been anticipated. The ground based measurement was made with a seeing of approximatel 0.8-1.0"(Jacoby and Kaler, 1989), while the WFPC2 measurement has a resolution of 0.1", an improvement of between a factor of 64-100(about 4.5-5 magnitudes). Since Jacoby and Kaler have an upper limit of mv=18.78, we might expect an upper limit to the WFPC2 measurement of between 23.3 and 23.8 magnitudes. That we do not go so faint may have two origins. First, Jacoby and Kaler had a longer measurement: 600 seconds. Second, we may have been conservative in estimating that a 50% change in the continuum level is necessary to recognize the central star. The effect of the longer exposure time is difficult to estimate, because the nebular background increases just as fast as the starlight. We maintain the estimate of mv=22.4. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000 Online publication: October 24, 2000 ![]() |