SpringerLink
Forum Springer Astron. Astrophys.
Forum Whats New Search Orders


Astron. Astrophys. 363, 311-315 (2000)

Previous Section Next Section Title Page Table of Contents

3. Solar activity: sunspot numbers

We considered here the record of solar activity given by the monthly mean number of sunspots, from SIDC archive (URL: http://www.oma.be/KSB-ORB/SIDC/index.html ), covering the time interval: 1749-2000.04 and consisting of 3013 observations. Using a proper wavelet analysis we found the results displayed in Fig. 1. Following the notation described in Sello (2000), the upper part shows the original time series in its natural units. Time is here expressed in years. The central part shows the amplitudes of the wavelet local power spectrum in terms of an arbitrary greyscale contour map. White higher values are strong energetic contributions to power spectrum, while black lower values are weak energetic contributions. Horizontal time axis corresponds to the axis of time series and vertical scale (frequency) axis is, for convenience, expressed in log values of cycles per year-1. Thus the range analyzed is between 148 years (value -5) and 134 days (value 1). The right part shows the mean global wavelet power spectrum (solid line, SM) obtained with a time integration of the local wavelet power spectrum, and the [FORMULA] significance level using a red noise autoregressive lag-1 background spectrum with [FORMULA] (dotted line, SC) More precisely, we assumed here that different realizations of the considered stochastic process, given by sunspot activity, will be randomly distributed about a red noise background spectrum (i.e. increasing power with decreasing frequency), which is used to verify a null hypothesis for the significance of a given peak in the wavelet power spectrum. In particular, if a peak in the wavelet power spectrum is significantly above the assumed red noise background spectrum, then it can be considered a real feature of the original signal with a given confidence level. This statement appears well justified from different applications to many complex physical signals, e.g. geophysical data. In order to obtain a simple model for red noise we considered a univariate lag-1 Markov process: [FORMULA], where [FORMULA] is the assumed lag-1 autocorrelation, and [FORMULA] is a Gaussian process. Note that: [FORMULA] corresponds to a white noise. (for more details see: Torrence et al. 1998). From the figure, it is possible to distinguish the main region corresponding to the well defined Schwabe ([FORMULA] years) cycle, with a dominant energetic contribution above the red noise background spectrum. In particular, the complex evolution of the cycle, both for scales and amplitudes, is well evident. The irregular finite extension in the map represents a continuous interaction of frequencies which generate complex dynamical behaviour. In order to better quantify the evolution of complexity, or disorder for the solar cycle time series, we computed the time evolution of the wavelet entropy. An interesting feature of this approach is that the usual assumed hypothesis of stationarity of time series is here not necessary.

[FIGURE] Fig. 1. Wavelet analysis of monthly mean sunspot numbers - right: mean global wavelet power spectrum (solid line, SM); and [FORMULA] significance level (dotted line, SC).

Fig. 2 (lower part) shows the time evolution of the wavelet entropy, Eq. (8). For comparison, an ordered deterministic (harmonic) signal gives the numerical result displayed by the dashed line. It is interesting to note that the degree of disorder reaches maximum local values, often in phase with solar maxima, where the magnetic activity results higher, but with many important exceptions (see, for example, cycles 20 and 22). The recorded maximum entropy value has been reached during the maximum of solar cycle 4 (1789). Moreover, the entropy results quite low for long periods, including solar cycles from 5 to 7 (1798-1828) and, in particular, for solar cycles from 9 to 14 (1848-1912). For the last three cycles, 21, 22 and 23, we found a clear average increase of the wavelet entropy, suggesting a more complex dynamics, with a higher level of disorder due to a broad frequency energy distribution, connected to evolution of the global magnetic activity. This property forces a reduction in the accuracy level reachable by prediction methods, which are based on some strong deterministic hypothesis. For nonlinear chaotic dynamics methods this means, at least, a lower value for Lyapunov's predictability time, (Sello 1999). Furthermore, we note that the level of wavelet entropy can help to quantify the intermittence degree in solar activity caused by all the stochastic sources and, in particular, by stochastic fluctuations in meridional circulation of plasma, which are able to influence significant unpredictable variation in amplitude and phase of the solar cycle, as recently evidenced by Dikpati & Charbonneau (1999). Finally, we point out that the new information, added by the wavelet entropy, it is not useful for sunspot predictions.

[FIGURE] Fig. 2. Monthly sunspot numbers (up) and wavelet entropy (down) time evolutions. The wavelet entropy for an ordered harmonic signal, is also displayed (dashed line).

In order to investigate more accurately the periodicities which drive the evolution of the wavelet entropy, we performed a wavelet analysis on the above derived time series. For this analysis we used a wavelet software provided by C. Torrence and G. Compo, and available at URL: http://paos.colorado.edu/research/wavelets .

Fig. 3 depicts the wavelet map with [FORMULA] confidence level regions. Here the scale axis shows the periods in log values. The u-shaped line corresponds to the so-called Cone of Influence, i.e. the region of the wavelet spectrum in which edge effects, due to the finite-length of signal, become important. (Torrence et al. 1998). The global power spectrum (right part, POW) indicates that there is mainly one significant persistent periodicity related to the wavelet entropy, and localized around 40 years, a possible period doubling value of the main Schwabe cycle (Lawrence et al. 1995). Other detected lower periodicities are more localized and energetically weaker, below the [FORMULA] significance level of the assumed red-noise background spectrum (right part, SL). The time evolution of the wavelet entropy suggests also the existence of other longer modulations, not resolvable in the available time series.

[FIGURE] Fig. 3. Wavelet analysis of the wavelet entropy - right: global power spectrum (solid line, POW); and [FORMULA] significance level (dotted line, SL).

It is interesting to point out possible relations existing between wavelet entropy behaviour and solar excursion phases, recently investigated by Mursula & Ziegler (1998). The excursion phases of the solar dipole are linked to the strong half solar rotation periodicity and arise when the heliospheric current sheet is flat and tilted. In particular, the authors found a clear connection between sunspot activity and the solar dipole tilt. More precisely, the overall occurrence of excursions remained very weak during solar cycles from 9 to 14, where the solar dipole moment was lower with a high stability of the coronal evolution, and this is coherent with the lowest values of wavelet entropy. Instead, during the most recent cycles (15-22) we detected largest excursions of the solar dipole, with a different cycle distribution, larger instabilities and a more disturbed heliosheet. This behaviour is again coherent with the overall increase of the wavelet entropy for the last cycles. The suggested correlation between wavelet entropy and solar excursion phases is here limited to a pure qualitative viewpoint. Further investigations, with a more quantitavive evaluation based on geomagnetic indices, are thus needed in order to support a reliable strict link between the degree of disorder in the sunspot activity, as measured by wavelet entropy, and the solar dipole mechanism.

Previous Section Next Section Title Page Table of Contents

© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000

Online publication: December 5, 2000
helpdesk.link@springer.de