![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 364, 102-136 (2000) 9. UncertaintiesIn this section we consider the effect on our abundances of
uncertainties in 9.1. Uncertainty in the the stellar parameters
|
![]() |
Fig. 8. ![]() ![]() |
was also computed (for the same
lines) from the BHB star data of Lambert et al. (1992) and is called
. It is seen that there is a
correlation between the values of
determined from our data and those of Lambert et al.; moreover the
range in this quantity is markedly greater for the
Ti II lines than for the Fe II
ones. This scatter in
is
greater than can be accounted for by measuring errors (the vertical
error bars) and must be caused by a factor that is intrinsic to each
species and which is common to both our calculations and those of
Lambert et al. It seems most likely that it is caused by errors in the
assumed
.
The models used to derive our abundances assume LTE conditions. In
hot stars, however, UV radiation can cause the Fe I
states to be underpopulated while the Fe II
lines are relatively unaffected; the effect is expected to
increase with decreasing metallicity. Lambert et al. (1992) tried to
allow for this effect by adjusting their stellar parameters so as to
make [Fe I ] - [Fe II ] = -0.2. Cohen
& McCarthy (1997), however, made no non-LTE corrections in
deriving the abundances of BHB stars in M 92. The
of their stars were in the range
7 500 K to 9 375 K and were derived from their
and
colours. They found a mean value
for
of only -0.08; this suggests
that non-LTE effects are not significant. The abundances, moreover,
which they found for their BHB stars were in excellent agreement with
those previously found for red giants in the same cluster. We find
=
0.01
0.01 for the 27 spectra where we
measured both Fe I and Fe II
lines. We therefore feel that it is unlikely that our iron
abundances are significantly compromised by non-LTE effects. Our
barium abundances (Table 9) were derived from the
Ba II
4554.03 line
alone and gave a mean LTE abundance of [Ba/Fe] from nine stars of
-0.08
0.05; hyperfine broadening was
not taken into account and significant non-LTE effects may be expected
for this line (Mashonkina & Bikmaev 1996; Belyakova et al.
1998).
For the coolest stars of our sample
(8 000 K)
there may be a problem with the treatment of the convection in the
model atmospheres. Uncertainties of the order of 200 K in
can be expected in the sense
that
is higher for the
mixing-length parameter l/H = 1.25 that we adopted than for the lower
value l/H =0.5 suggested by Fuhrmann et al. (1993, 1994). Also, a
different convection theory, like that of Canuto & Mazzitelli
(1992) leads to a very low convection (or no convection) in stars
hotter than 7 000 K, so that
derived by adopting this theory
may be lower than that derived by us. We feel, however, that more
accurate observations that allow a more precise location of the
continuum and more discussions on the theories adopted to compute the
Balmer profiles are needed in order to confirm the superiority of
other convections over that adopted by us. The effect of convection on
the colour indices and Balmer profiles, and therefore on the
derived from them, has been
discussed by Smalley & Kupka (1997), van't Veer-Menneret &
Méssier (1996), Castelli et al. (1997), and Gardiner et al.
(1999).
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: December 15, 2000
helpdesk.link@springer.de