 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 364, 327-338 (2000)
3. The JPL model
In this section, we will check the quasi-stability results for a
very realistic model of Solar system. The model used here is defined
by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) ephemeris, file DE406. The JPL
ephemeris comprises files containing interpolatory polynomials for the
orbital data of each planet, including the Sun, Earth and Moon. These
data can be easily used to derive the vector field acting on an
infinitesimal particle under the attraction of the main bodies of the
Solar system. Of course, this (numerically obtained) vector field is
only defined for the time interval for which the ephemeris is
provided.
3.1. Numerical simulations
The initial time for the numerical integration is the modified
Julian day 20.1978749133 (day 0.0 corresponds to year 2000.0), that
coincides with the first full Moon of year
2000. 1 This is
to have an initial relative position of the Earth, Moon and Sun
similar to the one of the BCP for .
The simulation stops at year 3000.0. We have also used the same mesh
as in the BCP model (see Sect. 2.2). Due to the lack of symmetry
between and
in the real system, we have carried
out simulations for both cases. The results obtained are very similar,
and are discussed in the following sections.
3.1.1. Stability around the family VF2
In order to compare these results with the ones for the BCP, we
have used the same mesh as in Sect. 2.2. Fig. 7 shows the
number of initial conditions corresponding to trajectories that do not
escape (in the same sense as in Sect. 2.2) for time spans of 10
years (upper curve) and 100 years (lower curve). We do not include the
results for 1 000 years because only a few trajectories subsist: in
the case, the number of these points
is never greater than 8, while for the
case this number is slightly bigger
(the more stable section corresponds to the case
, that contains 85 surviving points).
Taking into consideration these results and the behaviour around the
family VF2, seems slightly more
stable than . Moreover, if the
integration time were long enough, we believe that all these
trajectories would finally escape.
![[FIGURE]](img91.gif) |
Fig. 7. Estimation of the size of the quasi-stable region corresponding to the family VF2 for the JPL model. The upper curve (marked with ) is for an integration time of 10 years. The lower curve (marked with ) corresponds to an integration time of 100 years. Left: case. Right: case. See the text for more details.
|
Note the size of the quasi-stable region for a time interval of 10
years (see Fig. 8 and Fig. 9). Although a stability time of
10 years is totally irrelevant for astronomical purposes, it could be
interesting for astronautical applications, since there would be no
need for any kind of control to keep an spacecraft there. The strategy
to transfer a spacecraft from a parking orbit to these regions is not
considered here. Roughly speaking, a transfer by means of a double
lunar swing-by from the standard Ariane Geostationary Transfer Orbit
to the vicinity of the triangular points can be completed in about 2
months using a little bit less than 900 m/s of
(Companys et al. 1996). For a
dynamical systems approach to similar transfers, see also Gómez
et al. (1993).
![[FIGURE]](img96.gif) |
Fig. 8. Quasi-stability regions (for a time interval of 10 years) near around the Family VF2 in the JPL model.
|
![[FIGURE]](img100.gif) |
Fig. 9. Quasi-stability regions (for a time interval of 10 years) near around the Family VF2 in the JPL model.
|
3.1.2. Stability around the family VF3
This family seems to be responsible for the largest quasi-stability
regions that we have found near to the Lagrangian points. Fig. 10
shows the number of initial conditions corresponding to non escaping
trajectories (this is the same plot as in Fig. 4 but for the JPL
model). As we have used the same parameters to define the mesh of
initial conditions, the "units" in these plots -the vertical axis- are
also the same as in the BCP. So, although the stability region for the
JPL model is smaller than that of the BCP, it is remarkable that there
exists a quite large stability region for a time span of 1 000 years.
In order to compare with the simulations for the BCP model, note that
1 000 years is more than 13 000 revolutions of the Moon around the
Earth.
![[FIGURE]](img106.gif) |
Fig. 10. Estimation of the size of the quasi-stable region corresponding to the family VF3 for the JPL model. The plot contains different curves corresponding to several quasi-stability times, ranging from 500 (upper curve) to 1 000 years (lower curve). Left: case. Right: case. See the text for more details.
|
Fig. 11 and Fig. 12 show the
coordinates of a few slices of the
quasi-stability region for a time interval of 1 000 years near the
triangular points and
, respectively. The selected slices
correspond to places in which the region is quite large, according to
Fig. 10. We recall that the unit of distance is the Earth-Moon
distance for the modified Julian day 20.1978749133, that is, 384 467
km.
![[FIGURE]](img110.gif) |
Fig. 11. Quasi-stability regions (for a time interval of 1 000 years) near around the Family VF3 in the JPL model.
|
![[FIGURE]](img114.gif) |
Fig. 12. Quasi-stability regions (for a time interval of 1 000 years) near around the Family VF3 in the JPL model.
|
From these plots, it seems that the BCP model contains several
features of the JPL system. This is especially true for the location
of the quasi-stability regions, as has been shown by these
calculations. However, the comparison between Fig. 4 (right) and
Fig. 10 also shows that not all the features of JPL are contained
in BCP. We believe that these differences are mainly due to resonances
in JPL that are not present in BCP, due to the simplicity of the
latter. The development and study of improved models is the subject of
work in progress.
Obviously, the size of these regions could depend on the length of
the integration time. To try to show this dependence, we have carried
out the following calculation. To fix the discussion, let us focus on
the point, and let
be the orbit on the family VF3 for
which when
( ).
Let be the number of non escaping
initial conditions after n years (we are using the same mesh as
before), around the orbit . Let
be
, that is,
denotes the total number of non
escaping points around VF3. The values of
, for n ranging between 100
and 1 000 years are displayed in Fig. 13. We have tried several
fits to these data, trying to show the persistence of a certain number
of points when n goes to infinity (Simo et al. 1995), but the
results are inconclusive. It turns out that the number of remaining
points strongly depends on the fitting function used, and there are no
theoretical reasons for suggesting any particular type of fitting
function. We think that longer numerical integrations will help to
elucidate this question.
![[FIGURE]](img126.gif) |
Fig. 13. Total number of non escaping initial conditions (vertical axis) against integration time (horizontal axis) around the family VF3. Left: case. Right: case.
|
3.2. Typical trajectories in the stable region
To explain the dynamics inside the quasi-stable region, we first
show a few trajectories corresponding to the slices
and
(see Fig. 10). In each slice,
we have selected an initial condition near the "central part" of the
stable region. For each initial condition, we have computed the
corresponding orbit in the JPL model, for the
case, and the results are displayed
in Fig. 14 and Fig. 15 (similar figures are obtained for the
case). To give a sense of velocity
we have drawn the orbit as a polygonal line, putting a vertex for each
day of the integration.
![[FIGURE]](img138.gif) |
Fig. 14. Trajectory inside the stability region of the JPL model, corresponding to the slice ( case). Left plot: projection; right plot: projection. Integration time: 2 years.
|
![[FIGURE]](img148.gif) |
Fig. 15. Trajectory inside the stability region of the JPL model, corresponding to the slice ( case). Left plot: projection; right plot: projection. Integration time: 2 years.
|
It is interesting to look at the
projection of these trajectories. They show that the vertical
oscillations are very close to an harmonic oscillator: there is a
clear frequency that dominates this motion and the remaining
frequencies appear as a perturbation. This dominating frequency is
already contained in the BCP and RTBP (it is related to the vertical
frequency of the points in the RTBP
and to the vertical frequency of the orbits PO1, PO2 and PO3 of the
BCP), and its period is a little less than a month.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: December 15, 2000
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |