![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 364, L54-L61 (2000) 3. Localization and identification of the afterglowThe late localization of the GRB complicated the detection of the optical afterglow, expected to be significantly fainter than the limit of existing sky surveys. Furthermore, the (presumed power-law) decay of the afterglow would be so slow that observations separated by several days would have to be compared before any probable candidate source could be established. Images of the Inter Planetary Network (IPN) error box were obtained
with the FORS1 instrument on Antu (ESO VLT UT1), starting 84 h
after the burst. Four 120 s exposures in the B,V and R bands of
each of two FORS1 fields, covering the error box (see Fig. 2),
were acquired under good seeing conditions (see Table 2 for a log
of the observations). On the same night we acquired I-band exposures
with a total integration time of 3600 s, using DFOSC on the
Danish 1.54-m telescope on La Silla. From this first set of exposures
no candidate optical transient could be identified. A subsequent set
of images with the same exposure times was acquired 135 h after
the burst, under less favorable seeing conditions. Comparing these two
epochs, one source located at R.A. =
6
Table 2. Journal of our observations of GRB 000131. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000 Online publication: December 15, 2000 ![]() |