![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 364, 587-596 (2000) 3. Accretion disk modelsIn many persistent LMXB:s the inner disk and compact star have sufficient X-ray luminosity to keep the outer disk completely ionized. (King et al. 1997) This suppresses the thermal accretion disk instability (Tuchman et al. 1990). The Z sources are LMXB:s where the compact star is a neutron star and the accretion rate is probably close to Eddington limit (van der Klis 1989). In these systems the disk temperatures should be high enough to make electron scattering is the dominant opacity source (Frank et al. 1992). SXT:s in outburst have also completely ionized disks. The vertical structure of accretion disks in LMXB:s is not very well known. It is often assumed that disks are very thin (Frank et al. 1992). However, this is not always a safe assumption (Shaviv et al. 1999). Irradiation may change the vertical disk structure (Dubus et al. 1999). Observations indicate that a thick disk is present at least in some LMXB:s (Mason 1989). Some X-ray (Hellier & Mason 1989) and optical (Hakala et al. 1999) observations are easiest to explain with asymmetric disks. The standard disk model (see e.g. Frank et al. 1992) has gaussian
vertical density profile if the disk is isothermal in vertical
direction. The disks of LMXB:s are probably not very similar to
standard disk model, as X-ray irradiation from the compact object may
affect the disk structure. In my simulations the disk structure is
needed only very near the disk surface, where the essential radiative
transfer takes place. In contrast, the standard model is used to
describe the entire disk and is most relevant at the disk plane, where
most of the disk mass is. Disk models used in simulations have
exponential vertical density profiles,
Effects of the mass flow from the donor and tidal forces can cause deviations from axial symmetry in the disk. These are often observed, as most non-eclipsing LMXB:s show significant orbital variations in their optical brightness (Van Paradijs & McClintock 1995). Asymmetric models require binning of the photons in two dimensions. To obtain statistics comparable to that of axisymmetric simulations, the required processor capacity increases with a factor at least as large as the number of azimuth bins. Small-scale roughness of the disk surface, caused by turbulence, may be present. As the disk rotates with the binary and the gas moves in the disk, the Stokes parameters will be effectively azimuth-averaged in real observations. Phase-resolved polarimetry has generally low signal-to noise ratio, as most LMXB:s have short periods and are very faint. Two simulations of non-axisymmetric disks with small-scale irregularities or warped disks were made. The Stokes parameters produced by simulations were azimuth-averaged to estimate the consequences of these effects. Brightness temperature at the band in which polarization is
measured and electron density are assumed to be proportional to powers
of radius, As where where In most persistent LMXB:s the companion star has much smaller luminosity than the accretion disk. This is also true for SXT:s during the outburst. In some cases the secondary star is heated by X-rays from the compact star, which is observed as low-amplitude (generally below 0.2 magnitudes) ellipsoidal variations in the lightcurve. The electron scattering of the radiation from the secondary star may produce an additional polarization component. This effect can be significant in CV:s, but in persistent LMXB:s and SXT:s in outburst this should be a very small effect. In quiescent transients this effect is probably responsible for most of the polarization (Dolan & Tapia 1989). Electron scattering of the disk radiation by the secondary star should be insignificant, as the secondary stars in LMXB:s have low surface temperatures and therefore low free electron densities. As the accuracy of polarization measurements does not allow accurate determination of the disk model, I used very simple disk models. All disk models used are axisymmetric or have azimuth-averaged Stokes parameters, and magnetic effects are ignored. As the polarization levels produced by electron scattering are quite small, other sources of polarization must also be considered. The effects of magnetic fields, such as cyclotron or synchrotron
radiation and disk disruption by magnetic field, are observed in some
LMXB:s, e.g Her X-1. Many LMXB:s exhibit X-ray bursts indicating
neutron star primaries with low magnetic field. Even in these systems
the effect of the magnetic field can not be directly neglected. The
magnetic field can cause the ionized gas emit elliptically polarized
cyclotron/synchrotron radiation. Electron scattering in non-magnetic
medium causes only linear polarization, but scattering in magnetic
field produces elliptically polarized radiation (Whitney 1991), with
larger effects in circular polarization. Magnetic field effects on
scattering are most important when the frequency of the radiation is
close to electron cyclotron frequency,
Differential saturation (Calamai et al. 1975) is an effect that produces pure linear polarization, when saturated absorption lines are Zeeman-splitted. In a typical LMXB spectrum most lines are in emission, so differential saturation from the disk can be safely neglected. In VY Scl stars, also known as anti-dwarf novae, most of the accretion disk is also ionized, and only the outermost parts of the disk may be neutral (Leach et al. 1999). In these systems the accretion rate shows long-term variations. Two explanations for this have been presented: shielding of the secondary by the accretion disk rim (Wu et al. 1995) and a magnetic mechanism, where starspots of the secondary close to the inner Lagrange point reduce the accretion flow (Livio & Pringle 1994). The latter scenario assumes that the secondary has a high surface magnetic field. CV secondaries are late-type stars with many absorption lines, and the secondary contribution to the optical luminosity may be significant. Therefore differential saturation may cause linear polarization in VY Scl stars. In some cases, the polarization produced by differential saturation may cancel some of the polarization produced by Thomson scattering (Huovelin 1990). If my results are applied to these systems, the polarization produced by differential saturation should be carefully estimated. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000 Online publication: January 29, 2001 ![]() |