![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 364, 732-740 (2000) 3. Location and morphologyThe radio emission from RX J0852.0-4622 is superposed upon a highly structured region of the Vela remnant. Much of this confusing emission is of similar surface brightness to that seen from the new SNR. Furthermore, the very bright, thermal region RCW 38 lies almost adjacent to the southeastern boundary of RX J0852.0-4622. The peak flux of RCW 38 is approximately 150 Jy beam-1 in the 2.42-GHz data. The presence of this confusing radio structure, both thermal and non-thermal, meant that RX J0852.0-4622 was not recognised as an SNR from pre-existing radio observations of the region. Prior to the X-ray discovery of RX J0852.0-4622 the non-thermal emission in this region was thought to emanate from the Vela SNR. 3.1. The 2.42-GHz morphologyThe filtered 2.42-GHz image presented by Combi et al. (1999) clearly shows the SNR to have a shell-like radio morphology. This is even apparent in unfiltered maps of the region, such as that presented in Fig. 1. Indeed, the emission now known to be associated with RX J0852.0-4622 can be recognised in the radio images presented by Duncan et al. (1995, 1996). Combi et al. (1999) also identify several additional features within their radio image, designated "A" through "D", which they suggest may represent extensions to the radio shell. These will be considered in more detail in Sect. 3.4. It should be noted that - possibly as a result of their filtering procedure - the 2.42-GHz image presented by Combi et al. (1999) does not show either the HII region RCW 38, or the bright, non-thermal emission from Vela-X to the west.
Fig. 2 shows a spatially-filtered image of the region surrounding
RX J0852.0-4622. This image has been filtered using the "bgf"
algorithm (e.g. Sofue & Reich 1979), implemented within the NOD2
software package. A number of filtering resolutions were used, and it
was (qualitatively) determined that the emission from
RX J0852.0-4622 was optimally enhanced with a filtering
resolution of approximately
A filtering resolution of The radio image of the new remnant is dominated by two opposing arcs. Some fainter radio emission is visible on the remnant's western side, although there is no obvious counterpart to the east. The brightest section of the radio shell lies to the northwest, and appears approximately coincident with the brightest region of the X-ray image. Comparing the radio with the X-ray emission (Fig. 2, lower panel), we see that the distributions of both are generally similar, at least in as much as can be discerned from the cluttered radio field. 3.2. The 4.85-GHz PMN dataFig. 3 shows data from the 4.85-GHz PMN survey from the same region as shown in the previous figures. Although this survey is not optimised for extended sources, the northern and southern sections of the limb-brightened shell stand out clearly.
The black circle near the centre of Fig. 3 fits the outer boundary
of the radio emission from both Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 well, and
represents what we take to be the outer boundary of the radio emission
from RX J0852.0-46221. This boundary is
Both the radio and X-ray data are consistent with a remnant centred
on Galactic longitude 3.3. Confusing structure within the field
As can be seen from Fig. 2, a good deal of additional radio structure
is visible in the vicinity of RX J0852.0-4622. Over the remnant
itself, most of this structure takes the form of two diffuse
"filaments", each of which is From larger images of the Vela region, such as have been presented by Duncan et al. (1995, 1996), these filaments are known to curve around Vela-X, forming almost a full quadrant of a circle. The eastern arc (as seen in Fig. 2) is highly polarised (e.g. Duncan et al. 1996), and appears to represent the current boundary of the shock from the Vela supernova event. Interestingly, the confusing filaments from Fig. 2 are almost completely absent from the PMN data. This is because of the observing and data processing procedures used as part of the PMN survey, coupled with the fact that the confusing filaments lie approximately parallel to the scanning direction of the telescope over the region of sky containing RX J0852.0-4622. 3.4. Extensions to the radio shell?As mentioned in Sect. 3.1, Combi et al. (1999) identify a number of additional features within their radio image. These features were designated "A" through "D" in Fig. 1 of their paper, and apparently extend for relatively large angular distances beyond the edge of the RX J0852.0-4622 shell (up to almost twice the radius of the remnant). Combi et al. (1999) argue that these features may represent extensions to the radio shell of RX J0852.0-4622 (c.f. Aschenbach et al. 1995). It is of interest to consider these in more detail. Examining the 2.42-GHz radio image of Combi et al. (1999), we find that radio features "A" and "C" appear to be sections of the much more extensive "arc" structures discussed in Sect. 3.3. These arcs can be traced in Fig. 2 for several degrees, up to the northern edge of the figure (i.e., beyond the boundary of RX J0852.0-4622). Larger radio images of the region show that these features continue for many degrees further, in both total-power and polarised intensity. Feature "B" appears to be an isolated, slightly extended source with no obvious connection to the new remnant (even in the unfiltered image presented in Fig. 1). Finally, feature "D" corresponds to the X-ray feature "D/D´" as identified by Aschenbach et al. (1995). Aschenbach (1998) notes that this feature is also a source of hard X-rays, but that this emission is associated with a much lower temperature spectrum than that from RX J0852.0-4622. We suggest, therefore, that none of the possible "extensions" identified by Combi et al. (1999) are associated with RX J0852.0-4622. A further argument against an association between these features and the new remnant is that the boundary of the RX J0852.0-4622 shock is well fitted (in both the PMN and Parkes 2.42-GHz survey data) by a circle. This is consistent with the radio morphologies of other young shell SNRs, such as Kepler (Dickel et al. 1988), Tycho (Dickel et al. 1991), and the remnant of SN1006 (Reynolds & Gilmore 1993), although we caution that RX J0852.0-4622 is considerably fainter than these and other young remnants. We also note that the higher resolution PMN image (Fig. 3), although not optimised for extended emission, shows no evidence for any connections between the features noted by Combi et al. (1999) and the shell of the new remnant. 3.5. The quasi-central source
The PMN image shows that a point-like (i.e. unresolved at a resolution
of The radio spectral indices of pulsar emissions are generally much
steeper than the 3.6. Radio spectrumThe presence of the confusing structure noted in Sect. 3.3 makes accurate estimates of the integrated remnant flux density difficult. The values for the flux density of the SNR given below were estimated by integrating the emission within the boundary of RX J0852.0-4622, as defined by the circle seen in Fig. 3 (lower panel). The integrated area extended approximately one beamwidth beyond this circle, in order to include all the flux from the shell. The base level was determined from flux minima near the centre of the remnant, as well as beyond the eastern and southwestern edges of the shell. Fluxes contributed by the confusing "filaments" seen to the western and eastern sides of the remnant (as discussed in Sect. 3.3) were estimated and subtracted from the total, integrated flux. Note that the uncertainties in the integrated flux values are dominated by baselevel uncertainty, rather than by uncertainties in the flux estimates of the confusing structure. We estimate the integrated fluxes of RX J0852.0-4622 at 2.42
and 1.40 GHz to be Estimates of the remnant spectral index were made from both
filtered and unfiltered images, using the T-T plot technique. The
northern section of the shell was found to have a consistent,
non-thermal index of Extrapolating the measured integrated flux to a frequency of
1 GHz (using a spectral index of
Table 2. Characteristics of the radio emission from RX J0852.0-4622, determined from the Parkes data. The spectral index measured for the southern limb of the SNR appears to be confused with nearby thermal emission. The surface brightness is given in units of W m- 2 Hz-1 sr-1. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000 Online publication: January 29, 2001 ![]() |