 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 317, 140-163 (1997)
2. Simulations of convection
All simulations were performed with a modified version of the
explicit hydrodynamical code PROMETHEUS (Fryxell et al. 1989;
Müller et al. 1991), which is a direct Eulerian implementation of
the Piecewise Parabolic Method of
Colella & Woodward (1984).
2.1. Convection inside the proto-neutron star
The simulations concentrating on the convective processes inside
the proto-neutron star have been performed neglecting effects due to
neutrinos completely. This is justified, since the main purpose of the
simulations was to demonstrate the existence of the convective
instability inside the proto-neutron star and to reveal the relevant
length scales and timescales of the convective overturn. We followed
these processes only over a period of about 30-50 ms and do not expect
any crucial modification of the gas flow by neutrino-energy gain or
loss. In particular, the convective velocities seen in our simulations
are so high that convective mixing is probably faster than neutrino
diffusion.
Neutrino viscosity should also be negligible, because the Reynolds
number of neutrino shear viscosity is relatively large for the
considered densities
-
g/cm3, temperatures
-10 MeV, length scales
cm and velocities
cm/s in the convective region. Estimates based
on the expressions given by van den Horn & van Weert (1981) yield
for the dynamical shear viscosity of neutrinos in the diffusive
regime
![[EQUATION]](img17.gif)
and for the corresponding Reynolds number
![[EQUATION]](img18.gif)
where
is the temperature in 5 MeV,
the density in
g/cm3,
the fluid velocity in
cm/s and
the typical length scale in
cm.
All simulations were performed with an elaborate, vectorized
equation of state, which contains contributions from neutrons,
protons, alpha particles, and a representative heavy nucleus in
nuclear statistical equilibrium. Electrons, treated as an arbitrarily
degenerate and relativistic gas, positrons, and photons were taken
into account.
The initial model was a spherically symmetrical (non-rotating)
post-bounce model of Hillebrandt (1987) which represented the
approximately
iron core of a
star about 12 ms after core bounce. As this
model was computed with a general relativistic correction to the
gravitational potential, the model had to be relaxed before it was
mapped onto the multi-dimensional grid. This was achieved by evolving
the model with the 1D Lagrangian hydrodynamics code of Janka
(unpublished) for another 17 ms. Then all waves created by the initial
force imbalance had died out.
In order to save a significant amount of computer time we used an
inner boundary condition at a fixed finite radius
km, which corresponds to an interior mass
. Hence, we did not simulate the flow in the
inner part of the proto-neutron star. We assumed hydrostatic
equilibrium at the inner boundary and approximated the interior mass
by an equivalent central point mass. The usage of such an inner
boundary is well justified for sufficiently short times, because
initially the inner part of the proton-neutron star is convectively
stable (see Figs. 1 and 2). Of course, one must take care that the
computational grid extends far enough into the stable region.
Self-gravity of the matter in the computational domain was computed
with the efficient algorithm of Müller & Steinmetz (1995),
which solves Poisson's equation in integral form by an expansion into
spherical harmonics. In the 3D simulations a spherically symmetrical
potential was used, which results from the angular-averaged density
distribution outside the inner boundary and the central point mass. As
the overall matter distribution remains nearly spherically symmetrical
during the evolution of the convective instability, this approximation
should cause only small errors. Two-dimensional test calculations with
and without a spherically symmetrical potential confirmed the
smallness of the errors.
The multi-dimensional simulations were started by mapping the
one-dimensional post-bounce model onto the 2D (or 3D) grid and by
perturbing the radial velocity on the whole grid with a random
perturbation of
amplitude. When reducing the perturbation to
the results changed only little.
2.1.1. Two-dimensional simulations
The two-dimensional simulations of convection inside the
proto-neutron star were performed in spherical coordinates using a
computational grid of 400 (non-equidistant) radial and 90
(equidistant) angular zones. Axial and equatorial symmetry was
assumed. The radius of the inner boundary was set to 15 km (see
above), while the outer edge of the grid was located at a radius of
2000 km.
In Figs. 1 and 2 the
and entropy distributions, respectively, are
displayed at several moments of time during the evolution. In both
figures the solid curve gives the initial distribution.
![[FIGURE]](img1k.gif) | Fig. 1. Time evolution of the angular-averaged electron number fraction
plotted versus enclosed mass
M(r) for a 2D simulation: solid (
t=0 ), dotted (
t=12 ms), short dashed (
t=14 ms), long dashed (
t=18 ms), and dash-dotted (
t=32 ms). Note that at
t=0 ms the model is spherically symmetrical |
![[FIGURE]](img2k.gif) | Fig. 2. Same as Fig. 1 but showing the angular-averaged (total) entropy per nucleon |
The deep trough in the
profile is the result of neutrino losses and
deleptonization around the neutrinosphere, where neutrinos decouple
from the stellar gas and where their mode of propagation changes from
diffusion to free streaming. Since electron neutrinos are created when
electrons and protons combine to neutrons, the gas close to the
proto-neutron star "surface" quickly neutronizes and the concentration
of electrons,
, decreases. The entropy maxima at
and
are caused by a combination of shock
propagation and post-bounce oscillations of the collapsed iron
core.
Figs. 1 and 2 clearly show that for
the initial entropy gradient as well as the
initial
gradient are negative, i.e., the stratification
is convectively unstable. From the inner boundary at
out to
and for
the
gradient is negative but the entropy gradient
is positive. The mass layer in between (
) is stable as both gradients are positive.
Outside the convectively unstable region the entropy gradient remains
negative up to
, while the initial
gradient becomes positive. Even further out
both gradients are positive up to the local entropy maximum at
, implying a convectively stable stratification.
In a narrow adjacent mass layer (
) which is located immediately behind the shock
the entropy gradient is strongly negative while the lepton gradient,
which is positive at the inner edge of the layer, quickly becomes
zero. According to the stability criterion this is a convectively
unstable situation. We point out that such unstable stratifications
can also be found in other core collapse simulations, as e.g., in
post-bounce models of Bruenn (1993). Note that although the different
regions may be rather narrow in terms of the mass coordinate
M(r) , they can nevertheless have a sizable radial
extension of several ten kilometers.
The evolution of the angular-averaged electron number fraction
and of the angular-averaged entropy
is shown for the two-dimensional simulation in
Fig. 1 and Fig. 2, respectively. While the trough in the initial
-profile is filled in, further inside the
adjacent, initially stable plateau is more and more eroded due to
convective undershooting. The corresponding effect can be recognized
in the evolution of the angular-averaged entropy distribution, where
the trough in the profile at
is filled in, while the entropy maximum at
is removed. Due to convective overshooting both
profiles are also flattened out to
which is well beyond the outer edge of the
convectively unstable mass layer at
. Figs. 1 and 2 clearly exhibit convective
mixing also immediately behind the shock wave in the region
where only the entropy gradient is unstable.
Here some convective over- and undershooting penetrate into the stable
layers above and below and influence the
and
profiles within about
around the convecting shell.
According to Figs. 1 and 2 the convective instability needs a
growth time of about 10 ms before significant modifications of the
entropy and lepton number distributions occur. It then takes another
10 to 20 ms to completely homogenize both the entropy and the
distributions in the unstable layers and in the
adjacent regions influenced by convective under- and overshooting.
Note in this respect that the extent of undershooting at the inner
edge of the innermost unstable region steadily increases with time and
has almost reached the inner boundary of the computational grid at the
end of the simulation. This may be taken as an indication that
eventually the whole proto-neutron star might be involved in this
process und thus neutrino transport by convective motions could be
more important than diffusive transport in deleptonizing the
proto-neutron star. However, only simulations which cover a longer
interval of the evolution and which also consider the whole
proto-neutron star can definitely confirm this possibility.
The development of the convective instability in the mantle of the
proto-neutron star is further illustrated in Figs. 3 to 7. The right
upper panels in Figs. 3a and 4a show that first the inner unstable
layer develops Rayleigh-Taylor fingers that penetrate inward and
plumes that rise outward. This is best seen from the entropy plot
(Fig. 4) which shows the two entropy maxima (in orange and red) and
the low-entropy zones (in blue) inside, between, and outside these
maxima. The position of the shock wave is at the inner edge of the
outermost blue region. The yellow-red ring immediately behind the
shock marks the outer unstable layer where the convective instability
requires a longer timescale (about 15-20 ms) to grow into the
nonlinear regime (lower two panels in Fig. 4). The Rayleigh-Taylor
fingers are subject to Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities that lead to the
formation of mushroom-like caps and strong bending of the mushroom
stems. As a consequence the initially narrow fingers begin to merge
into successively larger blobs (upper and lower left panels in Figs. 3a and 4a). After another 5-10 ms the whole unstable region is
involved in a convective overturn (lower right panels in Figs. 3 and
4). Finally, after about 25-30 ms, the inner region is completely
mixed and homogenized.
![[FIGURE]](img3k.gif) | Fig. 3. Convection inside the nascent neutron star. The four panels show the time evolution of the electron number fraction
in a region between 15 km and 155 km. The panels are arranged in counter-clockwise order, starting from the right upper side, and show snapshots at 12 ms, 14 ms, 18 ms, and 21 ms after the start of the 2D simulation. The colours correspond to
in the range
with increasing values from blue, over green, yellow, and orange to red. Blue regions have
, yellow regions correspond to
, orange regions to
, and red ones to
|
![[FIGURE]](img4k.gif) | Fig. 4. Same as Fig. 3 but showing the time evolution of the entropy distribution. The colour levels correspond to entropies in the range
with increasing values from blue, over dark green and yellow to red. Blue regions have
, dark green regions correspond to
, yellow regions to
, and red regions to
|
The convective mixing releases gravitational binding energy by
establishing a more compact stratification in the mantle of the
proto-neutron star (see also Figs. 7 and 17). The liberated binding
energy is used to temporarily push the shock out to about 400 km which
is more than twice its initial radius. This is illustrated in Fig. 5
which shows the evolution of the entropy distribution between 20 and
32 ms after the beginning of the simulation. The outward propagation
of the shock is clearly seen, as well as the mushrooms rising up from
the outer convectively unstable layer. The shock expansion comes to a
halt at
-40 ms and subsequently a re-contraction sets
in.
![[FIGURE]](img5k.gif) | Fig. 5. Convective overturn in the proto-neutron star and transient shock expansion. The four panels show the time evolution of the entropy in a region between 15 km and 403 km. The panels are arranged in counter-clockwise order, starting from the right upper side, and show snapshots at 20 ms, 25 ms, 28 ms, and 32 ms after the start of the 2D simulation. The colour coding is the same as in Fig. 4 |
![[FIGURE]](img6k.gif) | Fig. 6. Same as Fig. 5 but showing the evolution of the divergence of the flow field. The colour coding is chosen such that compression waves are strongly enhanced. Dependent on their strength shocks are encoded from dark blue to light blue while sound waves appear in yellow |
As the convective velocities reach and even partially exceed the
local sound speed (
cm/s) strong pressure waves and even weak shock
waves are generated by the convective flow. This is illustrated in
Fig. 6, where the divergence of the velocity field is shown for the
same four snapshots of time as displayed in Fig. 5. Besides the
propagation of the shock wave, one recognizes several strong,
interacting sound waves "emitted" from the convective region and
propagating outward behind the supernova shock front. The convective
layer itself shows a turbulent wave activity which reflects the
non-stationary character of the convective overturn. Moreover, we see
from Fig. 6 that the shock wave is not perfectly spherically
symmetrical and exhibits large-scale deformations caused by the
interaction with rising convective elements. The overall, moderately
prolate deformation of the shock front along the symmetry axis of the
two-dimensional computational grid for
ms is produced by a large convective element
that rises rapidly near the symmetry axis (see Figs. 3, 4 and 5). We
point out, however, that its outward velocity may in fact be
overestimated because of the imposed axial symmetry which implies that
convective elements near the symmetry axis are blob-like while those
at the equator are torus-like.
The convective activity inside the proto-neutron star causes
significant inhomogeneities in the temperature and density
stratifications as illustrated by Fig. 7. The inhomogeneities vary in
time and space implying non-radial mass motions and a time-dependent
mass quadrupole moment associated with the outer layers of the
proto-neutron star. Both effects generate gravitational radiation with
typical frequencies in the range of several hundred Hz to about one
kHz (see Sect. 3). In the transition from the upper panels (at
after the start of the simulation) to the lower
panels (at
) in Fig. 7 the more compact stratification of
the later state is clearly visible.
![[FIGURE]](img7k.gif) | Fig. 7. Structural effects of convective instabilities on the proto-neutron star. The four panels show two snapshots of the time evolution of the temperature distribution (left two panels) and of the logarithm of the density distribution (right two panels) in a region between 15 km and 95 km. The upper two snapshots are taken 12 ms and the two lower ones 21 ms after the start of the 2D simulation. The colours correspond to temperature values in the range
and to density values in the range
, both increasing from blue, over green and yellow to red. Yellow regions have a temperature of about
K and a density of approximately
g/cm3. Below and near the neutrinospheric region which is at a density of about
g/cm3, density contrasts of about a factor of 2 develop and temperature differences of up to
occur |
![[FIGURE]](img8k.gif) | Fig. 8. Time evolution of the minimum value of the angular-averaged electron number fraction
in the convective region of the proto-neutron star: solid (2D simulation); dotted (3D simulation in a
sector); dashed (3D simulation in a
sector) |
![[FIGURE]](img9k.gif) | Fig. 9. Convection inside the nascent neutron star. The snapshot shows a meridional cut (
) of
14 ms after the start of the 3D simulation with a cone of opening angle
. Note that the shapshot is taken at the same time as the upper left panel in Fig. 3. The radial size of the displayed region and the colour coding is the same as in Fig. 3 |
![[FIGURE]](img10k.gif) | Fig. 10. Same as Fig. 9 but showing the evolution of the entropy distribution. The colour coding is the same as in Fig. 4 |
Although not included in the present simulation, we may speculate
about another, possibly very important effect of convection, which has
implications for the explosion mechanism. Convective mixing around and
below the neutrinospheric region near the proto-neutron star surface
may be accompanied by an increase of the neutrino luminosities during
the early phase of the supernova explosion. Since the convection is
dynamical and violent and the gas velocities are close to the local
speed of sound, neutrinos could be transported out of the dense
interior of the newly-formed neutron star much faster than by
diffusion. The corresponding increase of the neutrino emission may
provide an important aid to the neutrino-powered explosion mechanism.
Moreover, the neutron star shrinks faster due to the enhanced cooling
of its surface layers. Since, in addition, the supernova shock is
driven further out as a consequence of the convective settling of the
outer parts of the proto-neutron star, ideal conditions for efficient
neutrino-heating in the postshock region are established.
2.1.2. Three-dimensional simulations
The two three-dimensional calculations were done on a grid (
) of
and
zones, respectively. The non-equidistant
radial zones covered the region
km, while the equidistant angular zones
covered a cone of opening angle
and
, respectively. In both simulations the cone
was centered at
and
and periodic boundary conditions were imposed
in the angular directions.
The development of the convective instability inside the
proto-neutron star looks qualitatively quite similar when comparing
the results of 2D and 3D simulations. The growth rates of the
convective instability are practically identical, as can be seen from
the time evolution of the minimum value of the angular-averaged
electron number fraction
in the convective region (Fig. 8). In
comparison with the 2D simulations the amount of overshooting and
undershooting is somewhat smaller in the two 3D simulations which
explains the smaller final
,
compared to
, by less mixing of high-
matter from the layers above and below into
the convective region (see also Fig. 16).
The qualitative similarity of the 2D and 3D results is also
confirmed by Figs. 9 and 10, which show snapshots of the distributions
of electron number fraction (Fig. 9) and of the entropy (Fig. 10) in a
meridional cut of the computational domain 14 ms after the start of
the simulation. The features present in Figs. 9 and 10 are
qualitatively very similar to those found in the 2D simulations at the
same epoch (see upper left panel of Fig. 3 and Fig. 4, respectively).
However, the finger-like or blob-like structures seen in the 2D runs
are actually toroidal structures (because of the assumed axial
symmetry), whereas the inhomogeneities in the 3D simulations are
genuine three-dimensional structures with no geometrical restrictions
imposed. Their development from small fingers or bubbles to
mushroom-like features which subsequently merge is illustrated in Fig. 11, which shows three snapshots of the surface
at times
t=12.2 ms, 13.6 ms, and 16.6 ms, respectively.
![[FIGURE]](img11k.gif) | Fig. 11. Surface of constant electron fraction
at
t=12.2 ms, 13.6 ms, and 16.6 ms (from top to bottom) for the 3D simulation that was performed in a wedge of opening angle
(between
and
) |
In order to compare the 2D and 3D results in a more quantitative
way we have performed a normal mode analysis by Fourier transforming
the electron number fraction (which is a good tracer of the
inhomogeneities) at different epochs of the evolution. The relative
power of the turbulent motions at different wave numbers and at
different radial positions inside the convectively unstable layer is
shown for the 3D simulation with
cone in Fig. 12 by contour plots at three
moments of time. A corresponding contour plot for the 2D simulation is
given in Fig. 13 at
t = 13.9 ms which is very close to the time of the
second snapshot in Fig. 12. In Figs. 12 and 13 the left ordinate gives
the wave number of the normal mode normalized to one quadrant
, while the right ordinate gives the
corresponding wavelength (in degrees) of the mode. This means that the
typical angular size of rising or falling lumps of matter is half this
wavelength. Note that in the 3D case, we have averaged the
distribution in
-direction before performing the Fourier
transformation. If we instead average over the distribution in
-direction the power spectrum does not change
significantly.
Fig. 12 shows that the evolution of the power spectrum is
characterized by small-scale features growing into large-scale ones in
the whole unstable layer, an effect which reflects the successive
merging of smaller Rayleigh-Taylor fingers into larger ones as well as
the increasing homogenization of the convective layer by the mixing
process. At
t = 16.6 ms (third panel in Fig. 12) all power has
become concentrated into structures which have a wavelength larger
than about 10 degrees, while early on in the evolution (first panel of
Fig. 12) a significant amount of power is contained in features with a
wavelength of several degrees only. Comparing the second panel of Fig. 12 with Fig. 13 one recognizes that at the epoch of maximum convective
activity the structures in the 3D simulation are only about half as
large with respect to their angular extent than those in the 2D
simulation. In particular, in the three-dimensional case the dominant
modes have (angular) wavelengths of about
-
(i.e., clump sizes of about
-
), while the corresponding values are around
-
(i.e., clump sizes of approximately
-
) in the two-dimensional simulation.
![[FIGURE]](img12k.gif) | Fig. 12. Relative power of the turbulent motions at different angular scales for a three-dimensional simulation of convection inside the proto-neutron star. The simulation was performed in a wedge of opening angle
(between
and
). The normal mode analysis was done with the electron fraction
. The three snapshots are taken at 12.2 ms, 13.6 ms, and 16.6 ms, respectively (from top to bottom). The levels of constant power are chosen linearily in steps of 10% of the maximum value. Note that the scale on the right of each panel is nonlinear and gives the wavelength (i.e., twice the angular size) of a structure in degrees |
![[FIGURE]](img13k.gif) | Fig. 13. Relative power of the turbulent overturn motions at different (angular) scales for a two-dimensional simulation of convection inside the proto-neutron star as deduced from the electron concentration. The snapshot is taken at 13.9 ms. The levels of constant power are chosen linearily in steps of 10% of the maximum value. Note that the scale on the right is nonlinear and gives the wavelength (i.e., twice the angular size) of a structure in degrees |
The angular-integrated angular kinetic energy as a function of time
also reveals quantitative differences between the two- and
three-dimensional results (see Fig. 14). The angular kinetic energy is
about a factor of 3-4 smaller in the 3D simulations than in the 2D
one. Fig. 14 also shows that the angular kinetic energy in the 3D
simulation performed within the
sector is significantly reduced compared to
the 3D simulation performed within the
sector. This reduction of the angular kinetic
energy is caused by the insufficient angular extent of the
computational domain, which hampers the development of the convective
instability, because the dominant structures have wavelengths of about
-30
which are too large to be correctly modelled
in a
sector. Note that early on in the evolution (
ms), when the dominant structures still have a
small angular size, the angular kinetic energy of both 3D simulations
agrees very well.
![[FIGURE]](img14k.gif) | Fig. 14. Angular-integrated angular kinetic energy as a function of time: solid (2D simulation); dotted (3D simulation in a
sector); dashed (3D simulation in a
sector) |
Further quantitative differences are found when comparing the root
mean squared angular velocity
![[EQUATION]](img119.gif)
of the 2D and 3D simulations at a given epoch. Fig. 15 shows that
in the three-dimensional simulations
is roughly a factor of two smaller than in the
two-dimensional simulation. Moreover, in 2D
shows larger variations as a function of the
enclosed mass than in the 3D case. This is simply caused by the fact
that the 2D convective structures are twice as large and have 3-4
times more specific angular kinetic energy than the 3D ones. Hence, in
the two-dimensional simulation the flow quantities are more
inhomogeneous and show larger spatial fluctuations. Compared to the
result of the 3D simulation with the
sector, the root mean squared angular velocity
obtained in the 3D simulation with the
angular sector turns out to be smaller in the
unstable region where initially both the lepton and the entropy
gradient are negative. As discussed before, this is a numerical
artifact of the insufficiently large angular grid in case of the
simulation performed with the
cone.
![[FIGURE]](img15k.gif) | Fig. 15. Root mean squared angular velocity versus enclosed mass 18 ms after the start of the simulations: solid (2D simulation); dotted (3D simulation in a
sector); dashed (3D simulation in a
sector) |
Because the root mean squared angular velocity and the angular size
of the structures is smaller in the three-dimensional simulations than
in the two-dimensional models, the genuine three-dimensional
finger-like and blob-like structures have less momentum than their
two-dimensional counterparts. This explains why in the 3D simulations
the extent of undershooting at the inner edge of the convectively
unstable layer is reduced compared to the undershooting found in the
2D simulation (see Fig. 16). Note that the "reference"
distribution, which is displayed as the solid
curve in Fig. 16 and which all multi-dimensional simulations are
compared with, refers to the result of a one-dimensional simulation
which leaves the initial
distribution (as function of the enclosed
mass) unchanged due to the disregard of neutrinos in the
hydrodynamical simulation and the lack of convective mixing in the 1D
case.
In two spatial dimensions convection penetrates by means of
undershooting about 1.2 pressure scale heights into the adjacent
convectively stable layers. In three spatial dimensions the
undershooting is reduced to about 0.8 pressure scale heights, i.e.,
the depth of the undershooting region is smaller by about 50% than in
the axisymmetrical models. Because of the insufficiently large angular
grid in the 3D simulation performed with the
sector, the extent of undershooting is less
strong by another 10 to 20% in this case (Fig. 16).
![[FIGURE]](img16k.gif) | Fig. 16. Angular-averaged electron number fraction
plotted versus enclosed mass for different simulations at 32 ms after the start of the computations: solid (1D); dotted (2D); short-dashed (3D with 60
sector); long-dashed (3D with 20
sector) |
The effect of convective overturn and mixing on the density
stratification and on the shock propagation is illustrated in Fig. 17,
which shows the density and mass distributions at
t = 32 ms for the 1D, 2D and 3D simulations. One
notices that the result for the 3D case lies in between the 1D and 2D
results and that in two spatial dimensions the structural effects are
largest. As already mentioned above, along with the convective
overturn of the matter potential energy is liberated in the
multi-dimensional simulations, which drives a re-expansion of the
stalled shock wave. Hence, the shock is located at larger radii in the
2D and 3D simulations than in the 1D model. Consequently, the mass
distribution at small radii is more compact in the multi-dimensional
cases, i.e., more mass is located inside a radius of about 45 km than
in the spherically symmetrical model (Fig. 17). Compared to the 2D
model these effects are reduced in the 3D simulation, because the
undershooting is weaker. Therefore the mass region involved in the
mixing is smaller and the proto-neutron star becomes less compact,
which in turn leads to less potential energy release and to a less
strong re-expansion of the shock wave,
at
t = 32 ms,
being the shock radius.
![[FIGURE]](img17k.gif) | Fig. 17. Angular-averaged density and integral mass distribution 32 ms after the start of the simulations: solid (1D simulation); dotted (2D simulation); dashed (3D simulation in a
sector). Note the dependence of the shock position and of the compactness of the proto-neutron star on the spatial dimension of the simulation |
2.2. Convection in the hot-bubble region
We have performed a second set of simulations, which were aimed at
studying the convective instability in the hot-bubble region and which
included a simple, but nevertheless reasonably well justified
treatment of neutrino effects in the stellar matter (for details, see
Janka & Müller 1995a, 1996).
In these simulations the inner part of the collapsed stellar core
slightly inside the neutrinosphere was cut out and time-dependent
neutrino fluxes were imposed at this inner boundary. Thereby, the
neutrino emission from the central part of the proto-neutron star was
mimiced. The radius of the inner boundary was either kept fixed, or
was allowed to shrink with time to take into account the contraction
of the cooling neutron star.
Due to neutrino heating an unstable entropy gradient builds up
between the shock and the neutrinosphere. Depending on the imposed
neutrino flux at the inner boundary, this hot-bubble region becomes
convective after about 50-80 ms. Thus, in our second set of
simulations two convective regions are present: (i) the lepton and
entropy unstable layer inside the proto-neutron star just below the
neutrinosphere, and (ii) the entropy-unstable hot-bubble region (see
Table 1). Although we located the inner boundary somewhat inside the
neutrinosphere, our computational domain did only partially encompass
the convectively unstable layer in the proto-neutron star. Putting the
inner boundary deeper inside the star reduces the time step
appreciably and thus makes the simulation significantly more
expensive, and, in particular, would have made the long time (up to 1
s past core bounce) hot-bubble simulations discussed in Janka &
Müller (1995a, 1996) impracticable.
Because only part of the inner convection zone is included in the
simulations the radial extent of the convective eddies and of the
undershooting is constrained and suppressed by the imposed inner
boundary condition. Convection inside the proto-neutron star is
therefore weaker in these models than we would expect in simulations
without an inner boundary at finite radius. Hence, the gravitational
waves produced by anisotropies in these models are primarily caused by
non-radial motions in the hot-bubble region (see Sect. 3).
The initial model was the collapsed
iron core of a
star at a time about 25 ms after core bounce.
By that time the prompt shock wave had transformed into a standing
accretion shock at a radius of about 115 km, enclosing a mass of
. The matter behind the shock has small
negative velocities and settles onto the forming neutron star. The
initial model was provided by Bruenn (private communication; see also
Bruenn 1993).
The two-dimensional simulations of convection in the hot-bubble
region were performed in spherical coordinates. The computational grid
consisted of 400 radial zones distributed non-equidistantly between
the time-dependent inner boundary and the fixed outer edge of the grid
at 17000 km, with 100 radial zones out to 290 km and 42 radial zones
within the innermost 100 km. Initially the inner boundary was located
at 31.7 km (
g/cm3 ) with an interior mass
(constant in time) of
. Over a period of about 0.5 s the radius of
the inner boundary was reduced to a value of 15 km. Thereby, we have
simulated the contraction of the proto-neutron star due to lepton and
energy losses. The gravitational potential was computed in the same
way as in the 2D simulations of convection inside the proto-neutron
star, i.e., as the superposition of contributions from the spherically
symmetrical point-mass potential associated with the mass inside the
inner boundary and from the 2D matter distribution in the
computational domain. In angular direction between 90 and 180
equidistant zones were used. In all simulations axial symmetry was
assumed, and in some simulations, in addition, equatorial symmetry was
imposed. The latter restriction was found, however, to influence the
growth of large-scale (
) angular modes negatively (for more details
see Janka & Müller 1995a, 1996)
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997
helpdesk.link@springer.de |