 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 317, 962-967 (1997)
3.
Modelling of the chemical scheme in IRC+10216 envelope
In order to take into account the stellar envelope expansion, the
chemical scheme described previously must be solved by means of the
coupled continuity equations:
![[EQUATION]](img57.gif)
where are the species concentrations,
v is the mean flow velocity and are
respectively the product and loss rates of the i compound in the
chemical reactions. Considering a steady spherically symetric flow,
the equation set can be expressed as:
![[EQUATION]](img60.gif)
where are the reaction rates. This system
has been solved using Runge-Kutta method (4th order). The abundance of
acetylene in the internal part of the envelope has been deduced from
the measurement of its absorption band at 3.04 µm (Keady
et al. 1993). It corresponds to (within a
factor 2 of accuracy). We have used this value as the initial
abundance in the internal envelope. In fact, the acetylene molecule is
involved in a large number of ion-molecule or radical-molecule
reactions. However, the modelling of Cherchneff et al. (1993) shows
that a very small fraction of its initial abundance is effectively
converted to subproducts in the internal and intermediate envelope
(about ). It is only in the external part
( ) that gets completely
photodissociated into . The metal (M) initial
abundance has been taken equal to that of free iron, supposed to be
the most abundant transition metal in the envelope, as in the
Interstellar Medium. We have adopted its cosmic abundance with a
depletion factor ( ) to take into account the
fraction already included into the grains formed in the internal
envelope. This depletion factor will be kept as a free parameter in
the model. As it was noticed in Sect. 2, when considering M as a
metallic cluster of n atoms, one must multiply the
value by in order to
compensate for the change both of the cross section and of the
abundance (varying respectively as and
). In addition, we have considered that the
competitive accretion process was continuing
all along the envelope expansion ( is considered
as inactive for the cyclotrimerization).
The physical parameters of the envelope (temperature, gas density
and dust properties) and the central star characteristics have been
deduced from the modellings of Cherchneff et al. (1993) and Rouleau
& Martin (1991). In particular, we have considered small grains of
amorphous carbon with an average size of . The
photon density has been determined as the resulting flux coming from
the central star ( , stellar photosphere radius:
), and the interstellar radiation field, taking
into account the dust extinction inside the envelope. In a first
approximation, we have considered a radial scattering direction
through the envelope. The dust density distribution is assumed to be a
power law with a sharp cut-off at , according to
the IR continuum on modelling of Martin & Rodgers (1987) using the
dust characteristics supported by Cherchneff et al.(1993). A first
estimation of the efficiency of the organometallic process in the
envelope can be assessed by comparing the average colliding times
between a free M atom and an acetylene molecule or a destructive
photon (i.e. with ). The characteristic times
are displayed on Fig. 3, as a function of the radial distance in the
envelope. The results depend strongly on the bonding energy value. If
, the photodestruction frequency is much higher
than the coordination one, everywhere invelope. On the contrary, if
, the catalytic process can develop within the
radius range: . For a higher value, this
favourable range increases. We have plotted on Fig. 4 the abundances
given by the modelling if the mean value is
adopted. The formation of aromatic molecules turns out to be very
efficient and the steady-state values for and
abundances are rapidly reached (within
). With a mean expansion velocity of 14km/s
(Cherchneff et al. 1993), this corresponds to a very short time scale
of about 30 yrs. The various abundances are given in Table 2 as a
function of the bounding energy.
![[FIGURE]](img80.gif) |
Fig. 3. Comparison of the mean colliding times between an iron atom and i) (solid curve), ii) a destructive photon ( ), with , originating from the central star (dash-dot curve) or the ISRF (dashed curve).
|
![[FIGURE]](img84.gif) |
Fig. 4. Relative abundances given by the modelling if , and .
|
![[TABLE]](img87.gif)
Table 2.
Steady-state abundances of and for different values of the metal depletion factor ) and the bonding energy .
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997
Online publication: July 8, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |