Astron. Astrophys. 318, 111-133 (1997)
3. Optical identification procedure
3.1. SIMBAD identifications
Our first step toward optical identification was to search the
SIMBAD database for positional coincidence with a catalogued object.
For the entire galactic plane survey, about 20% to 30% of the sources
may be readily identified with SIMBAD entries with an expected number
of random spurious coincidence of about 10% of the identifications
(Motch 1992). A similar identification rate was derived from the
analysis of a small area in the galactic plane in Perseus (Motch et
al. 1991).
In our 'full' area, 30 among 95 sources (i.e. 31%) detected at a
maximum likelihood larger than 10 have SIMBAD entries within
r90 the 90% ROSAT survey confidence radius. Scanning the
database shows that the mean density of SIMBAD objects in a
region centered on l = , b =
is 130 per square degree.
With an average r90 = (ML
10), we expect a random match in
2% of the cases. This lower false identification
rate compared to former studies is due to the improved accuracy of
survey X-ray sources positioning with respect to the first analysis.
We thus expect 2 wrong identifications among the 30 SIMBAD proposed
matches. However, the spatial density of SIMBAD entries may be locally
much higher because of the inclusion of a particular catalogue (e.g.
the catalogue of objects in the direction of M39 compiled by Platais,
1994). Therefore, whenever the information retrieved from the
literature was not firmly conclusive we tried to obtain our own
optical data.
3.2. Optical observations
All optical data were obtained at the Observatoire de
Haute-Provence in the time interval from 1991 May till 1993 September.
A description of the instrumentation used may be found in Motch et al.
(1996a).
For each ROSAT source we produced a finding chart using the HST
Guide Star Catalogue (GSC, Lasker et al. 1990). GSC data were
extracted in a first step from the STARCAT facility at ESO (Pirenne et
al. 1993) and later from the SIMBAD catalogue GSC browser
(Preite-Martinez & Ochsenbein 1993).
In the cases where one or more rather bright GSC stars were lying
close to the center of the X-ray position, with apparently a rather
low probability of random coincidence, we directly started our
investigation by obtaining medium resolution spectroscopy
( 3800 - 4300 Å ; FWHM resolution
1.8 Å) of the GSC candidates. These
spectra allowed the detection of re-emission in the Ca II H&K
lines which is a well known signature of chromospheric and associated
coronal activity (e.g. Schrijver 1983, Maggio et al. 1987). When the
chromospheric activity was not found at the level expected from the
intensity of the X-ray source (see below) or when no bright GSC star
was conspicuous in the error circle, we obtained B and I band CCD
photometry of the field. From the B-I index we could select stars
exhibiting a red excess, presumably dM star candidates and blue excess
objects considered as candidates for white dwarfs, cataclysmic
variables and background AGNs. We then obtained low resolution
spectroscopy ( 3500 - 7500 Å ; FWHM
resolution 14 Å) of the photometric
candidates and of other faint sources if necessary. We tried to push
our optical low resolution spectroscopic investigations at the same
limiting magnitude for all sources at a given X-ray count rate in
order to preserve as much as possible the completeness of the
identified sample. This means that for the X-ray brightest
unidentified sources we are complete down to V
17-18. However, considering the sometimes relatively high number of
objects encountered in the error circles and the changing instrumental
conditions our optical depth is probably not quite homogeneous.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997
Online publication: July 8, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |