 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 318, 535-542 (1997)
4. Conclusion
We have observed circumstellar K I and
Na I emission from three N-type carbon stars and
interprete this as resonance scattering of the photospheric light. We
have found the dynamics of the envelopes, as seen in the potassium
lines, to be reasonably consistent with what is deduced from the CO
lines which sample regions further out in the envelopes. The
intensities show a rough dependence which is
expected for a constant mass loss rate, gas expansion velocity and
K I abundance. An interesting and astonishing fact is
that the intensities are large enough to suggest that a substantial
fraction of the potassium in the envelope is in neutral form. This
puts limits on the chromospheric UV emission (shortwards of the
K I photoionization threshold at 285.5 nm) for
these stars. Since mass loss is a regular phenomenon for N-type stars,
with typical mass-loss rates of 10 (Olofsson et
al. 1993), an important aspect of this is that the existence or
non-existence of strong K I emission may be used as an
indicator of the suppression or existence of chromospheric UV
emission. Systematic deep surveys of K I emission for a
sample of bright N-type stars, and observations of UV fluxes of those
with the Hubble Space Telescope, would be rewarding to verify this
connection which could then establish a new chromospheric indicator.
Also time variations (in particular the "turning off") of
K I emission may be worth searching for. Another
interesting fact is that the dependence of the
envelope emission seems to continue inside the point in the envelope
where the column optical depth should be . It
seems possible, though not very probable, that this is due to
inhomogeneities, clumps, in the envelope, similar in origin to those
previously traced in detached CO shells. A more detailed modelling of
radiative transfer and hydrodynamics in these media may be worthwhile,
and seems necessary before more safe conclusions may be drawn.
One may ask why the objects which show K I emission
in our survey all happen to have column optical depths around unity
within the angularly resolved envelopes. This may well be a selection
effect. Denser envelopes, corresponding to larger
, should have smaller surface brightness, and so
would considerably thinner envelopes. A deeper search to lower surface
brightness for other N-type stars may be rewarding.
We finally note that the mass loss estimates from the
K I emission scale as the distance d or
to the star, while the CO mass loss estimate is
proportional to . Thus, in principle distance
estimates - indirect expansion parallaxes - are possible, though
rather model dependent. Also, errors in adopted abundances may be
significant and, in fact, comparisons of CO emission with
K I or Na I emission might be used to
estimate abundances of K and Na relative to O. However, improved
models are needed before any of these possibilities may be
exploited.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997
Online publication: July 8, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |