 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 318, 729-740 (1997)
4. Image detection and photometry
Image detection was accomplished with a connected-pixel algorithm,
using the IMAGES program of the RGASP galaxy photometry software
package (Cawson 1983). For classification as a genuine image, a group
of ten or more adjacent pixels ( arcsec
diameter) had to have R band intensities above a threshold of
above the sky background (where
represents the pixel-to-pixel standard
deviation of the sky background). This minimum number of pixels
corresponds to the expected minimum area of any reliably detected
image due to the size of the seeing disc; given the image scale of
0.3 arcsec/pixel, this corresponds to the area within the
half-maximum intensity isophote of a star under good seeing. The
threshold was chosen to exclude a significant
chance contribution of background pixels to the area of detected
images (Driver 1994). A conservative estimate of the background
standard deviation was taken, based on adopting the largest value from
either: the measured background variation; a theoretical prediction of
the noise in the background assuming Poisson statistics; or a value of
of the background level (based on the
expectation of a limiting accuracy of the
flatfielding process on large scales). In practice, the Poissonian
prediction of the background standard deviation was adopted for all
four fields. To safeguard against spurious detections of random groups
of sky background pixels, a signal-to-noise ratio test was used to
reject low confidence detections. Monte-Carlo tests were performed on
simulated data frames constructed using Poissonian noise distributions
in order to assess the number of false detections retained after
imposing different signal-to-noise ratio limits. Further simulations
were carried out using twilight sky frames subjected to the same data
reduction procedure as the night sky data. On the basis of these
tests, a signal-to-noise ratio limit of 6.0 for the isophotal data was
adopted. This value was found to give as few as one or two false
detections per frame for the random noise simulations.
Once R band catalogues of images on the data frames had been
compiled, magnitudes were determined using (variable) aperture
photometry. In contrast to isophotal photometry, this technique should
measure all the flux from a detected object when used with a large
enough aperture size. Ideally the radius of the aperture should be
chosen for a particular galaxy to include essentially all the signal
from the galaxy, but not so large that it includes unnecessary noise
from the sky background or nearby sources. Tyson (1988) noted that, as
expected, isophotal magnitudes are close to the total magnitudes for
bright objects, while Metcalfe et al. (1991) showed that aperture
photometry using Kron radii (Kron, 1980) results in fixed aperture
sizes for faint objects (effectively the Kron radius for a star). We
therefore chose a variable circular aperture radius
computed from the isophotal radius
as,
![[EQUATION]](img34.gif)
where and n are constants.
was calculated from the number of pixels having
intensities above the threshold of the RGASP detection process, being
the radius of a circular region containing that number.
is set to 3 arcsec, about twice the
typical seeing width (and in keeping with Metcalfe et al., 1991, and
Lilly et al. 1991). The aperture radius therefore reduces to
3 arcsec for the faintest objects while approaching the isophotal
radius for the brightest. The optimal value of the exponent n
was selected on the basis of simulations of the measurement of images
of face-on exponential disc galaxies; being
circular and lacking bulge or nuclear components, these provide the
most extended and flattest profiles among the conventional galaxy
population. The values of for different values
of n were calculated for different magnitudes and compared with
the isophotal radius, the Kron radius and the radius containing
of the light. Using an exponent of
was found to be close to
the light radius over a wide range of total
magnitudes, even at the faintest limits, and close to 2.5 Kron radii;
we therefore chose to adopt Fig. 2 shows the
dependence of the total detected magnitude within a circular aperture
for different aperture radii for the case of face-on, exponential
light profile, galaxies. The various curves in
the figure represent different methods for defining the aperture
radius.
![[FIGURE]](img41.gif) |
Fig. 2. A comparison of radii of variously defined photometric apertures as a function of total galaxy magnitude. The curves represent the sizes of circular apertures defined in six different ways for simulated face-on exponential disc galaxies. The locus for radii chosen to contain 90% of the light is shown, as is that corresponding to detection at the 26.0 mag. (arcsec)-2 isophote. Radii set at 2.5 times the Kron (1980) radius are presented. The results of Eq. (1) are given for indices and 2.0. An index was selected for the photometry of Sect. 4
|
A local measurement of the sky background surface brightness was
used to remove the sky background contribution from the total signal
within the aperture for each image. This was defined as the median of
the pixel intensities in a 15-pixel wide circular annulus centred on
the image, having an inner radius of excluding
pixels which themselves lay within the inner radius of the equivalent
annuli used to determine the background level around other images. In
this way, an estimate of the background level was obtained which was
essentially free of the contributions of detected images.
To avoid problems associated with incomplete data at the edges of
the frames, only object images whose centres lie further than 30
pixels from the edges are considered. Fuller details of the image
detection and photometric techniques are presented by Driver
(1994).
The determination of the observed properties of galaxies is
complicated by the overlapping of images through chance alignments.
The reliable decoupling of blended images is a difficult process,
complicated by factors such as the uncertainty in deciding how to
assign the signal in the merged regions between the images, and the
dependence of the efficiency of the process on the brightness of the
image. For this analysis, if the isophotes of the two objects
overlapped we simply considered the system as merged and counted it as
a single image. The effects of the overlapping of images in detecting
and parameterising faint galaxies in the vicinity of brighter ones are
discussed in Sect. 5.3, where it is shown that overlapping images do
not significantly affect the clustering statistics of interest
here.
Once these principles had been used to provide R-band magnitudes
for each detected image, B magnitudes were computed using the same (R
band) image catalogue and the R band apertures. This method ensures
that each image is treated identically in each of the two wavebands in
an effort to minimise photometric errors in the colour index.
The photometric results for all four fields are displayed as a
colour-magnitude diagram in Fig. 3, showing all images, both stars and
galaxies. The broad distribution is similar to that found by other
authors (e.g. Tyson, 1988, and Metcalfe et al., 1991). The faint blue
excess, however, is encountered about one magnitude brighter at any
given colour than in many other studies. This
effect is found to be pronounced among the 1993 field data, but not
those from 1991. That this is not a calibration problem affecting the
1993 data is confirmed by an inspection of the
against colour-colour diagram for brighter
( ) images; a majority of the images, which at
these magnitudes are expected to contain a significant fraction of
stars (50-60%), conform closely (within ) to
standard (Bessell 1979, and Bell & Gustafsson 1979, 1989) stellar
loci. The problem therefore affects only fainter images - if indeed it
is a problem rather than some statistical fluke. While it is expected
that random photometric errors will be greater for the 1993
observations due to their shorter integration times, the origin of the
difference remains unclear. However, for the purposes of the present
study, where colours and magnitudes need to be measured only
sufficiently accurately to enable a broad classification, the excess
blue tail to the colour distribution at faint magnitudes is
unimportant.
![[FIGURE]](img50.gif) |
Fig. 3. The - B colour-magnitude diagram for the detected images of all fields, showing the candidate the faint blue and the faint red galaxy samples. The solid curve is the locus corresponding to the no-evolution model of Sa-type giants. The dotted curve is the Sa giant locus displaced by an amount corresponding to Bruzual's (1983) models. The dashed line illustrates the predicted completeness limit for the deepest field; all galaxies beyond this limit are rejected from the samples
|
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997
Online publication: July 3, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |