Astron. Astrophys. 318, 747-767 (1997)
5. Comparison with observations
In this section we derive the expected characteristics of the warps
produced by the coupling process. Let us first summarize the main
results obtained in the previous section. The reader can also refer to
Fig. 7 where the situation is depicted.
- The spiral wave travels outward until it reaches its OLR.
Before it reaches it, the coupling with warps is too weak to affect
the spiral.
- When it reaches the OLR (more precisely within a distance of the
order of
from the OLR) the spiral slows down
and is efficiently coupled with warps. This results in the
"conversion" of the spiral into three warps which carry the incident
flux of the spiral away from the coupling region: two warps at
frequency , traveling respectively outward and
inward, and the last warp at frequency µ, which is
emitted outward.
- The flux absorbed from the spiral is approximately equally shared
by the three warps, for reasons of conservation of angular momentum
and energy.
- In the following we will neglect the absorption of the spiral wave
by Landau damping. Thus our results on the warps amplitudes will be
optimistic, but still give results of the correct order of magnitude
since the length scale of Landau damping and non-linear coupling are
similar.
![[FIGURE]](img191.gif) |
Fig. 7.
This figure shows the spiral wave and the three warp waves excited near its OLR by non-linear coupling. See the text for more details.
|
5.1. Amplitude of the warp
We will now derive a rough prediction of the warp displacement
resulting from our mechanism. For each of the three warps we can
write:
![[EQUATION]](img194.gif)
where the factor comes from the result (see
Sect. 4.2.2) that the three warp waves share nearly equally the flux
extracted from the spiral (the rest of the flux of the spiral being
absorbed by Landau damping, as discussed in Sect. 4.3).
In order of magnitude, the flux of the spiral is given by:
![[EQUATION]](img196.gif)
Similarly, the fluxes of the warps emitted outward are:
![[EQUATION]](img197.gif)
In these expressions, is the unperturbed
surface density of the stellar disk, where the spiral propagates, and
is the unperturbed surface density of the
external HI disk, where the two emitted warps propagate.
Now if we adopt a radial dependence of such
as given by Shostak and Van der Kruit (1984), that we will very
roughly describe by :
![[EQUATION]](img200.gif)
where is the radius of the optical limit of
the disk, d the decaying length of surface density (a sizable
fraction of ), we can deduce an approximate
radial dependence of the deviation Z. We find :
![[EQUATION]](img202.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img203.gif)
and
![[EQUATION]](img204.gif)
(see e.g. Huchtmeier and Richter 1984 or Shostak and Van der Kruit
1984).
and we take as a value for the amplitude of the spiral
(but it could be larger than this widely
adopted value, see Strom et al. 1976). This leads us to:
![[EQUATION]](img206.gif)
Of course decreases progressively as the
warps propagate outward, and Z accordingly grows to preserve
the flux.
The dependency found above is typical of what is observed in
isolated spiral galaxies. It is noteworthy - and we believe that this
has not yet been noticed - that the flux of the spiral waves is of the
same order of magnitude as the flux of the warps. We consider this
coincidence as a strong point in favor of our mechanism
- independently of its details -, and a challenge to any
alternate model.
5.2. Expected characteristics of the corrugation
The computations concerning the reflected warp are slightly
different. One should remember that it propagates in a region where
both stars and gas are present, a fact which cannot be neglected when
discussing its characteristics. In a previous paper (Masset and
Tagger, 1995) we discussed the propagation of warps in a two-fluid
disk. We found two types of waves: the first type corresponds to waves
where both fluids move essentially together, while the second type
corresponds to waves where the fluids move relative to each other;
assuming that the stellar disk is much warmer and much more massive
than the gaseous one, in this type of wave the stars stay essentially
motionless while the gas moves in their potential well. We consider
that this wave, which we call the corrugation mode, will be excited
much more easily than the previous ones, since it moves much less mass
and thus its amplitude for a given energy must be much higher. Its
dispersion relation is:
![[EQUATION]](img207.gif)
where the subscripts g and apply to
gaseous and stellar values, and where is the
stellar density at midplane. Because of the moderate thickness of the
stellar disk, the square frequency is much
larger than the other characteristic frequencies of the problem, and
in particular larger than the frequency of the
wave which can be non-linearly excited. A solution can nevertheless be
found because inside the OLR of the warp the last term in the
dispersion relation is negative, and can for large enough values of
q balance the dominant term . Neglecting
the self-gravity of the gas, and writing (a
realistic assumption since the ratio of these quantities is about one
tenth), we find:
![[EQUATION]](img214.gif)
Assuming a vertical stellar density profile
(i.e. the disk is dominated by the local stellar gravity, which is a
reasonable assumption), this can be rewritten as:
![[EQUATION]](img216.gif)
Taking , and of the
order of one kiloparsec, we find an order of magnitude of one
kiloparsec for the wavelength of the corrugation. This is consistent
with the observed wavelength for the corrugation, in the Milky Way
(Quiroga and Schlosser 1977, Spicker and Feitzinger 1986) or
in other galaxies (Florido et al. 1991a). Despite the
observations by Spicker and Feitzinger of a one kiloparsec corrugation
in our galaxy, it seems that the typical wavelength of corrugation is
rather about 2 kiloparsecs, or even larger (Florido et al.
1991b). The discrepancy of between
observations and our estimate could be due either to the magnetic
field which affects the gas motions and thus should imply the use of
magnetosonic speeds instead of the acoustic speed, or to a lack of
resolution of some observations. From equation (6), we find that the
wavelength of corrugations increases as we approach the edge of the
optical disk, in good agreement with observations.
Now let us give an order of magnitude of the expected amplitude of
the corrugation. As already explained, we can write that its flux is
about one third of the spiral flux. Now the flux of the corrugation is
roughly given by (the index c is for corrugation):
![[EQUATION]](img220.gif)
where:
![[EQUATION]](img221.gif)
since , and:
![[EQUATION]](img223.gif)
Hence:
![[EQUATION]](img224.gif)
which gives, taking into account :
![[EQUATION]](img226.gif)
Taking and , we
obtain an expected amplitude for the corrugation of about one hundred
parsecs, which is typically the observed value. Note that, as
discussed above, energy can also be given to the other modes,
involving both the gas and the stars, for the reflected warp. Their
expected wavelength is larger than the disk radius, so that their line
of nodes should be almost straight, corresponding to the observations
of Briggs (1990), and so that the corrugation can easily be detected
when superimposed on such large scale bending waves.
5.3. Straight line of nodes
We have found thus far that our mechanism leads to results that fit
well the observations for the amplitudes of the "outer" warps (the two
waves emitted beyond the OLR of the spiral) and of the corrugation,
and for the wavelength of the corrugation. We now turn to the
wavelength of the outer warps. Actually the line of nodes of the
observed warps is always nearly straight, leading to radial
wavelengths larger than the galactic radius. This is known as the
problem of the straight line of nodes, and is one of the most
serious challenges to models of warps. In his work on the "Rules of
Behavior of Galactic Warps", Briggs (1990) has emphasized this remark:
the line of nodes of the outside warps appears nearly straight or with
a slight spirality, always almost leading. Later observations have
shown that outside warps could also be slightly trailing, but always
nearly straight. This can be interpreted from our mechanism, which
predicts the emission of two warps outward from the OLR. In fact, the
frequency of the first warp is µ, leading from the
dispersion relation to a wavevector , hence a
straight line of node. The second one is emitted at
, i.e. near its OLR. From the dispersion
relation of warps taking into account the compressibility effects near
the OLR (see e.g. Masset and Tagger 1995), we see that
must tend to zero in order to balance the
behavior of the resonant denominator, thus also leading to a straight
line of nodes.
Of course this is a qualitative and simple interpretation, since we
use results obtained in the framework of the WKB assumption (tightly
wound waves) where is precisely not allowed to
become small. Hence this discussion about the straight line of nodes
is just the very beginning of a more complete work which should take
into account non-WKB effects and the cylindrical geometry. This work
is in progress, using the numerical code introduced in Masset and
Tagger 1995. Finally, we should mention that the combination of two
warps outside OLR can easily justify the large and arbitrary jump in
the line of nodes across the Holmberg radius observed by Briggs, since
the relative phase between warps 1 and 2 is arbitrary.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997
Online publication: July 3, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |