 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 318, 975-989 (1997)
6. The next five billion years evolution of the Earth-Moon system
As we have managed to set up some limitations on the possible
values of the tidal dissipation and the viscosity of the outer core,
by using the available geological observations of the past evolution
of the Earth, we are now ready to study its future over its expected
lifetime, i.e. about 5 Gyr.
6.1. with the present tidal coefficient and no core-mantle friction
Using Laskar's theory of the solar system, we simultaneously
integrate over 5 Gyr the motion of all the planets (Pluto is not taken
into account) and the angular momenta of the Earth and the Moon with a
250 yr time step.
The equations for the planetary orbital motion used here are the
averaged equations which were previously used by Laskar for the
demonstration of the chaotic behavior of the solar system. They
include the Newtonian interactions of the 8 major planets of the solar
system (Pluto is neglected), and relativistic and Lunar corrections
(Laskar, 1985, 1989, 1990). The numerical solution of these averaged
equations showed excellent agreement when compared over 4400 years
with the numerical ephemeris DE102 (Newhall et al., 1983,
Laskar, 1986), and over 3 millions years with the numerical
integration performed by Quinn, Tremaine and Duncan (Quinn et
al., 1991, Laskar et al., 1992). Similar agreement was
observed with subsequent numerical integration by Sussman and Wisdom
(1992).
This system of equations was obtained with dedicated computer
algebra and contains about 50000 monomial terms of the form
(Laskar, 1985). It was first constructed in a
very extensive way, containing all terms up to second order with
respect to the masses, and up to 5th degree in eccentricity and
inclination, which led to 153824 terms, and then truncated to improve
the efficiency of the integration, without significant loss of
precision (Laskar, 1994). The numerical evaluation of this simplified
system is very efficient, since fewer than 6000 monomials need to be
evaluated because of symmetries. Numerical integration is carried out
using an Adams method (PECE) of order 12 and with a 250-year stepsize.
The integration error was measured by integrating the equations back
and forth over 10 Myr. It amounts to after
years (40 000 steps), and behaves like
. Ignoring the chaotic behavior of the orbits,
this would give a numerical error of only
after 10 Gyr.
It is clear that because of the chaotic dynamics with a
characteristic time of 5 Myr, the orbital solution loses its accuracy
beyond 100 Myr. This is not important since we do not look for the
exact solution, but for what happens when the system enters the
chaotic zone; the fact that this zone may not be at the exact location
has not much importance.
We have chosen to take the near present value of 600 seconds for
and no core-mantle friction. In order to have a
statistical view of the possible behaviors, the whole system is
simultaneously integrated over 5 Gyr for 500 different initial
orientations with obliquities very close to :
10 initial phases separated by
rad and 50 initial obliquities separated by
degree.
Thus we have performed a frequency analysis (see Laskar, 1993) on
the precession frequency and also plotted the minimum and maximum
reached obliquity each 10.26 Myr. The whole computation, for such an
experiment, took about 13 days on a IBM-RS6000/390.
It is quite obvious that we cannot display all the various
solutions, and we just selected two examples of the possible evolution
of the Earth (Fig.4a-b) which are representative of the whole
experiment. The two curves plotted in Figs. 4a and
4b have
initial obliquities differing by 36 as. We see
that the obliquity enters the chaotic region at about
1.5 Gyr and that it can go from
to values close to as
was the case in the conservative framework. When superimposed on
Fig. 1, those graphs show possible paths of the evolving
obliquity through the different zones of the global dynamics.
![[FIGURE]](img272.gif) |
Fig. 4a. Example of possible evolution of the Earth's obliquity for 5 Gyr in the future, for s. The background of the figure is the same one as in Fig. 1, and is a global view of the stability of the obliquity, obtained by means of frequency map analysis (see Laskar and Robutel, 1993). The precession constant (on the left) is plotted against the obliquity: the two bold curves correspond to the minimum and maximum values reached by the obliquity. The right y-axis gives the corresponding time for the motion. The non-hatched zone corresponds to very regular regions, and we actually observe that in these regions, the motion suffers only small (and regular) variations. The hatched parts are the regions of strong chaotic behavior. Indeed, in the present simulation, as soon as the orbit enters this chaotic zone, very strong variations of the obliquity are observed, and very high values, close to 90 degrees, are reached.
|
![[FIGURE]](img245.gif) |
Fig. 4b. Same as Fig. 4a, but with a difference of degree in the initial obliquity.
|
The computed speed of rotation of the Earth after 5 Gyr is about
0.42 . Provided that kg
m-3 (Hinderer et al., 1990) and that
, one can easily check that condition
of Sect. 3 has not been violated.
The 500 different paths obtained in this manner allow us to get a
fairly good idea of the probability for the obliquity to attain some
given threshold once the chaotic zone entered. For instance, we have
found that 342 maximum obliquities have exceeded
at least once, hence a probability
(see Fig. 5).
![[FIGURE]](img282.gif) |
Fig. 5. Probability P for the maximum obliquity to exceed a given value for the Earth with . This was performed over 500 orbits with very close initial conditions followed over 5 Gyr.
|
6.2. some alternatives
seconds is close to
the present measured value of the dissipation coefficient, and is in
agreement with the observations at -500 Myr (Fig. 3a), but this
leads to a lunar collision at about 1.2 Gyr in the past. For this
reason, we also considered for the smaller value
of 200 seconds which is close to the lowest value compatible with
these geological observations (Fig. 3a). As previously, for
seconds, we followed the evolution of 500
obliquities. As the dissipation is three times weaker, the Earth
reaches the chaotic zone on a much longer time, after about 4.5 Gyr,
and after 5 Gyr it has spent only about 500 Myr in this chaotic zone;
the probability of reaching a given high value of obliquity is then
lower than in the previous case of seconds for
which the same situation lasted 3.5 Gyr (see Fig. 6), and we have
, which nevertheless is not a small value. If
we continue the integrations over 6 Gyr, which is still a possible
future lifetime for the Earth, we obtain for
the much higher value of (Fig. 6). We
carried on the computation till 8 Gyr in order to look at the
evolution of this probability, and we also plotted in Fig. 6 the
corresponding curves for 7 and 8 Gyr. Then, the set of the four curves
shows that the longer the Earth remains in the chaotic zone, the
higher are the probabilities for the maximum obliquity to reach any
value (the possible maximum hardly exceeding
after 8 Gyr).
![[FIGURE]](img292.gif) |
Fig. 6. Probability P for the maximum obliquity to exceed a given value for the Earth with after 5, 6, 7 and 8 Gyr.
|
We can thus conclude that for any value of the tidal dissipation
compatible with the geological observations depicted in Fig. 3a,
a very large obliquity in the future of the Earth is a highly probable
event.
Finally, we notice that all curves present a falldown at about
and a step till a second falldown to 0 close
to . This can be understood by the fact that,
as is shown in Laskar et al. (1993b), the chaotic zone is
divided into two regions of strong overlap of secular resonances. In
each of these regions, the diffusion of the orbits is rapid, but the
connection between these two boxes is more difficult. As soon as a
given orbit enters the second box, related to high values of the
obliquity, it will rapidly describe it entirely, so we observe in this
case a jump in the maximum value reached by the obliquity.
One would like to consider some very larger
coefficients or in order
to accelerate the effect of the dissipation and to shorten a lot the
time of integration by the way. For example, Touma and Wisdom (1994)
set a tidal effect about 4000 times stronger than the present value in
their study of the past evolution of the Earth's obliquity. We have
integrated the system with three different values:
, and seconds, the last
one roughly corresponding to what Touma and Wisdom took. The
equivalent despinning of the Earth is then respectively achieved after
100 Myr, 10 Myr and 1 Myr instead of 5 Gyr.
The results clearly show that the dynamics are altered as much as
the time scale of braking is reduced (see Figs. 7a-c). In the
first case, we have found . In the second one,
the obliquity remains confined below . Finally,
secular resonances have a faint effect in the last case, the obliquity
never exceeding . For both last cases, the 500
initial conditions nearly give the same evolution.
![[FIGURE]](img297.gif) |
Fig. 7a. as in Fig. 4ab, the precession constant (on the left) is plotted against the obliquity: the two bold curves correspond to the minimum and maximum values reached by the obliquity. Example of evolution for the obliquity of the Earth with .
|
![[FIGURE]](img300.gif) |
Fig. 7b. Example of evolution for the obliquity of the Earth with .
|
![[FIGURE]](img303.gif) |
Fig. 7c. Example of evolution for the obliquity of the Earth with .
|
It is then clear that such a strategy has to be excluded: the time
scale of action of the dissipation must be of the same order as the
true one.
We have chosen to neglect the core-mantle
friction because the tidal effects are traditionally considered as the
only substantial effects. We could also have undertaken some
integrations with non-zero viscosities in order to see the core-mantle
friction play an important role, the obliquity being slowly
decreasing. As was discussed in Sect. 4, such a scenario is plausible.
In any case, the rate of change in obliquity would be relatively small
according to relation . As the Earth enters the
chaotic zone before 4.5 Gyr and undergoes
strong variations due to the planetary perturbations, the choice of
the couple has finally not very much
consequence on the very long term evolution of the spin, provided the
observations and the time scale of dissipation are respected,
according to Fig. 3.
Nevertheless, it must be stressed that for very high viscosities,
the CMF could dominate the evolution of the obliquity before the 5 Gyr
term. With the highest possible value
m2 s-1 suggested by the palaeo-observations,
reaches only /Gyr when
. Then, such a situation appears to be extreme;
this supports our studies with .
The formulation of the tidal dissipation
used in these integrations corresponds to a model for which the
function Q is inversely proportional to the speed of rotation.
Consequently, as suggested by MacDonald's computations (MacDonald,
1964) with a constant geometrical phase lag and the present tidal
dissipation rate, the choice of the model for which Q is
constant would lead to a faster despinning in the future, and the
chaotic zone would be attained sooner.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997
Online publication: July 3, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |