Forum Springer Astron. Astrophys.
Forum Whats New Search Orders

Astron. Astrophys. 319, 578-588 (1997)

Next Section Table of Contents

Constraints on mass loss from dMe stars: theory and observations

G.H.J. van den Oord 1 and J.G. Doyle 2

1 Sterrenkundig Instituut, P.O. Box 80.000, 3508 TA  Utrecht, The Netherlands
2 Armagh Observatory, Armagh BT61 9DG, Northern Ireland

Received 14 March 1996 / Accepted 21 August 1996


We show that the flux distribution of a wind from a cool star differs considerably from what is predicted by the theory for mass loss from hot stars. The differences are caused by the facts that 1) the mass loss rates are lower, resulting in smaller optical depths in the wind, and 2) for winds from cool stars the temperature of the wind is higher than the temperature of the star while for winds from hot stars the reverse holds. These differences result in substantial modifications of the flux distribution and imply that care must be exercised when applying the flux predictions by e.g. Wright and Barlow (1975) to winds from cool stars. By using observational constraints we show that the mass loss from cool dwarf stars equals at most [FORMULA]. This is a factor hundred lower than previous estimates. At this rate the mass loss from dMe stars is of little importance for the enrichment of the interstellar medium. By solving the radiative transfer equations for stellar winds from dMe stars, we show that the inferred power-law flux distributions, based on radio, JCMT and IRAS data, cannot be reconciled with the flux distributions from a stellar wind of [FORMULA] as was previously assumed. The maximum allowable mass loss rate is at most a few times [FORMULA] which implies that the fluxes observed with JCMT, IRAS, and in the future with ISO, require a different interpretation than free-free emission from a stellar wind.

Key words: stars: late-type – stars: mass-loss – ISM: general – infrared: stars – radio continuum: stars – ultraviolet: stars

SIMBAD Objects


Next Section Table of Contents

© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997

Online publication: July 3, 1998