![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 319, 637-647 (1997) 5. Variability of the line parameters:
|
![]() | Fig. 5. The variation of the Li feature with the rotational phase. From top to bottom: rotational phases 0.96, 0.94, 0.79, 0.77, 0.73, 0.71, 0.48, 0.41, 0.40, 0.36, 0.34, 0.29, 0.28, 0.04. |
Fig. 6 shows the variations of position of the center of
gravity of some lines in the Li region, expressed by the rotational
radial velocity (km s-1 )
versus the rotational phase of
CrB. We
believe that the variation of the line position is a real effect, but
the number of the available observations for the phases
.00 -
.20,
.50 -
.70 is insufficient
for the determination of the accurate shape of the rotational radial
velocity curve. The full amplitude of the
variations is consistent with the projected rotational velocity of
CrB (v sin i
2-3 km s-1, Preston, 1967). The maximum amplitude of
the
variations is shown by the lines 6702.10
Å Gd II, and 6704.3 Å
Gd II+Ce II. Our observations indicate that most of the
lines vary with the period of rotation. For completeness of
presentation of the spectral variability, we have used also other
spectral regions:
6645 Å
Eu II, and
6149 Å
Fe II. The behavior of these lines is similar to those of the Li
region, but with different amplitudes. The typical scattering from the
curve of rotational radial velocity for the Li region is about 0.3 -
0.5 km s-1.
![]() |
Fig. 6. Rotational radial velocity ![]() |
Fig. 7 and 8 show the results of our measurements of the
equivalent widths and full width at half
maximum FWHM with the rotational phase. The behavior of each line is
different. The maximum amplitude of the curve
versus rotational phase is shown by the blends 6704 Å
Gd II + Ce II and 6706 Å Fe I +
Ce II, while the lines of Fe I at
6149, 6702 , 6716, and 6715 Å almost do not vary, and
6702 Å Gd II shows small
variations; therefore the more variable lines are probably those of
Ce II. The equivalent width of the Li blend does not vary very
much, while the FWHM shows remarkable variations. The FWHM of lines of
Fe I and Eu I do not vary in an appreciably way.
![]() |
Fig. 7. The equivalent widths ![]() |
![]() | Fig. 8. FWHM versus the rotational phase. |
The data giving the relations ,
, and FWHM versus the rotational phase are
sufficiently well defined only for few lines. The FWHM is almost
constant for the lines examinated, with the exception of
6708 Å. The maximum and the minimum FWHM
are observed at rotational phases
.3 and
.8 respectively. At phase
.3 the equivalent width has its maximum value
while at phase
.8 has a medium value. When the
rotational radial velocity
is at the maximum
and minimum values (i.e. the lithium + other contributors are
concentrated at the borders of the stellar disk) the FWHM is at its
medium and not at the minimum value, as we should expect. Hence the
relations between
,
, and
FWHM are not easily interpretable and possibly indicate the presence
of several concentrations of different intensities.
The only two other lines for which we have reasonably well defined
curves both for the equivalent width and the rotational radial
velocity are 6702 Å Gd II and
the blend 6704 Å Gd II + Ce II. They show
roughly the same behavior, with
at its medium
value when the rotational radial velocity is at maximum and minimum
values, and
is maximum when
has its medium value; this behavior can be
explained by one large spot where Gd and Ce are concentrated.
6706 Å Fe II +
Ce II shows a very well defined curve
versus rotational phase, in phase with those for
6702 and 6704 Å , but no
rotational radial velocity curve was available.
6716 Å Fe I shows two curves
with smaller amplitude than those for
6702,
6704, and 6706 Å and a different behavior, with
at maximum for
varying
from its medium to its maximum value and
at
medium value for medium value of
. The full
analysis of the correlations between the variations of
,
, and FWHM need more
observations.
We interpret the asymmetric absorption feature
6708 Å (Fig. 5) as
due to the blend of two components with variable center of gravity of
each component. A possible explanation is a spotted distribution of
lithium and other unknown blending elements on the stellar surface. A
source of uncertainty both for the study of the variations of the
rotational radial velocity versus the rotational phase and for fixing
the position of the 6708 Å feature is not a sufficient
precision in the wavelength scale. We have made corrections to the
wavelength scale after a critical analysis of the binary radial
velocity curve (Polosukina & Malanushenko, 1995) using the
numerous measurements of radial velocity by Neubauer (1944), Oetken
& Orwert (1984) and Kamper et al. (1990). The difference between
the orbital elements by Oetken & Orwert and Kamper et al. cannot
be neglected, because the orbital radial velocity curve presents a
very deep and narrow minimum, and the position of the minimum depends
on the accuracy in the determination of the period. Since the value of
the period is not defined with sufficient precision (only two decimal
figures), it is impossible to obtain a very accurate determination of
the position of the spectral lines, which is necessary in our study of
the Li feature, especially for the observations made in 1990 - 92
which fall near the minimum of the orbital radial velocity curve.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997
Online publication: July 3, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de