![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 319, 909-922 (1997) 1. IntroductionFrom observations with the HEAO Only recently, with the successful operation of the imaging
Several astrophysical environments have been proposed as sites for the production of 26 Al in the Galaxy, all related to either explosive nucleosynthesis or hydrostatic hydrogen burning: besides oxygen-neon-magnesium novae (ONeMg novae) which are discussed below, these are, core-collapse supernovae (SNe; e.g, Timmes et al. 1995), Wolf-Rayet stars (e.g., Pranztos & Cassé 1986, Meynet 1994, Langer et al. 1995) and asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars (e.g., Guélin et al. 1995, Forestini et al. 1991). Estimates have been made which suggest that each of these source groups alone could potentially account for all of the observed 1.8 MeV emission. However, the emission from individual nova outbursts or AGB stars is expected to be too weak to be detected as isolated sources, rather the corresponding population would create a diffuse background radiation at 1.8 MeV. In contrast, SNe and Wolf-Rayet stars are thought to produce 10 to 100 times as much 26 Al per event/object, so that they would not only contribute to a background, but could also appear as individual sources. Moreover, as they are the youngest objects, and therefore are more closely associated with regions of recent star formation, they appear to be the best candidates to explain the observed clumpiness at 1.8 MeV. For a detailed overview of relevant observations and a critical discussion concerning suggested sources of interstellar 26 Al, we refer the reader to the very nice review by Prantzos & Diehl (1996). In this paper, we specifically investigate ONeMg novae as sites of 26 Al production in the Galaxy. An ONeMg nova is believed to be a classical nova system in which the thermonuclear runaway (TNR) occurs on an ONeMg WD. The numerous observations of classical novae whose ejecta show significant enrichments in intermediate-mass elements, particularly neon, in the last ten years strongly support the existence of such systems (e.g., Politano et al. 1995; Starrfield et al. 1996 and references therein), although there is some question as to how much neon demands the presence of an underlying ONeMg WD (e.g., Livio & Truran 1994). Essential for significant production of 26 Al during the TNR is the presence of a sufficient amount of 24 Mg seed nuclei (e.g., Weiss & Truran 1990), which is believed to enter the envelope from the underlying WD material through some mixing process or processes. Previous estimates of the amount of 26 Al produced by
ONeMg novae range from Our purpose in this paper is therefore twofold: (1) to improve on earlier estimates of 26 Al production in ONeMg novae and compare the improved estimate with the recent COMPTEL data, and (2) to investigate how the new, tighter observational constraints on the 26 Al background may help to constrain free parameters in our theoretical understanding of both the galactic population of CVs and the nucleosynthesis during the TNR in classical nova outbursts. In particular, we improve on earlier estimates in two regards. First, we obtain the 26 Al mass fraction in nova ejecta as a function of WD mass, initial enrichment of the accreted envelope, and accretion rate from a grid of detailed ONeMg nova models, calculated with a 1-dimensional hydrodynamic code coupled to an extended nuclear network (Politano et al. 1995, 1996), thereby exploring a greater range of parameter space than was done in Politano et al. (1995). Second, we combine these data with a detailed background model for the Galactic CV population (Kolb 1993a). As a result we come up with the first self-consistent prediction for the 26 Al production in ONeMg novae solely from theoretical models. We present data from the TNR simulations which are important for this study in Sect. 2. The CV population models and their relationship to the classical nova population are described in Sect. 3. We show and discuss our results in Sects. 4 and 5, respectively. Main conlusions follow at the end of the paper. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997 Online publication: July 3, 1998 ![]() |