![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 319, 909-922 (1997) 6. ConclusionsApplying Galactic nova population models and recent 1-dim. hydrodynamical nucleosynthesis calculations for ONeMg novae, we have examined the 26 Al production by ONeMg novae in the Galaxy. We summarize our key conclusions below. (1) The amount of 26 Al produced by our model
populations is strongly dependent on the assumed mass ratio
distribution in ZAMS binaries. Populations of CVs which evolve from
progenitor ZAMS binaries in which the masses of the primary and
secondary stars are uncorrelated produce (2) 26 Al production is also a strong function of the
amount of mixing which occurs between material accreted from the donor
star and material from the underlying white dwarf. For a given
population, maximum 26 Al production is achieved for a
level of mixing of (3) 26 Al is produced almost exclusively from systems
with high mass transfer rates in our model populations and, therefore,
systems with orbital periods above the period gap. We note that this
is not a trivial result, since such systems comprise only
(4) Choosing optimal models and parameter values, we estimate an
upper limit for 26 Al production from ONeMg novae of
Uncertainties in both theory and observations, particularly our lack of understanding of the physical mechanism responsible for mixing in classical novae, preclude us from placing a lower limit on 26 Al production from ONeMg novae (other than zero) with any confidence at this time. (5) Selecting models and parameter values that are the most
consistent with observational quantities independent of 26
Al production (e.g., fraction of CVs below the period gap, properties
of post-CE binaries, mean WD mass in CVs, etc.), we find a value of
We note that the specific values quoted in points (4) and (5) above are predicated on our assumption that the formation of CVs with ONeMg WDs is quantitatively similar to the formation of CVs with high-mass CO WDs. If detailed models of the formation of CVs with ONeMg WDs suggest otherwise, then our predictions would need to be re-evaluated in light of these more accurate models. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997 Online publication: July 3, 1998 ![]() |