SpringerLink
Forum Springer Astron. Astrophys.
Forum Whats New Search Orders


Astron. Astrophys. 319, 1025-1035 (1997)

Previous Section Next Section Title Page Table of Contents

3. The model assumptions

We now describe the model assumptions underlying the numerical calculations. The model topology basically follows the standard model for AGN (cf. Blandford 1990).

There is not very much known about the central sources of galactic superluminal jets. Since observationally the jet phenomenon of AGN and of young stellar objects as well is always connected to the signatures of an accretion disk, we assume a similar disk-jet scenario for the jet formation in galactic superluminal jet sources.

In the following, we discuss the three main components of the applied model - a central black hole, a surrounding accretion disk, and the asymptotic jet. A schematic overview of the model is shown in Fig. 1.

[FIGURE] Fig. 1. Applied model topology for the jet formation around rotating black holes. The sketch shows the asymptotic region in the upper part and the inner region around the black hole (BH) in the lower part. The two regions are drawn in different scales.

3.1. The central black hole

In the standard model for AGN the driving engine responsible for the activity is a rotating super massive black hole with a mass of about [FORMULA] (Sanders et al 1989).

In the case of galactic superluminal sources, there is evidence that the central object is a black hole as well (Mirabel & Rodriguez 1995).

For the calculation of the field structure from the force-free stream equation, gravitational effects of the collapsed object play a non-obvious role. They appear in the stream equation in the description of the gravitogeometric background and in the two light surfaces.

The differential rotation of the space around Kerr black holes leads to the formation of two light surfaces (hereafter LS). Here, the rotational velocity of the field lines relative to the ZAMO equals the speed of light (see Blandford & Znajek 1977). This could be understood from the following. The concept of field lines implies the rigid rotation of each field line. Far from the hole, where [FORMULA] is small, the outer LS describes the point where the field line velocity equals the speed of light seen from a static observer in the non-rotating space. Close to the hole, the space and the co-moving ZAMO is forced to (differentially) rotate. Since the field line is rigidly rotating, at a certain position (the inner LS) it will reach the speed of light in opposite direction seen from a ZAMO. Here, [FORMULA], and the 'field velocity' equals [FORMULA].

In terms of the global jet solution, the inner LS is very close to the horizon. With the numerical method applied, there is no fundamental hindrance for a solution between the inner LS and the horizon. However, since our main interest is the jet solution, we take the inner LS as inner boundary for the integration region. The black hole horizon itself remains hidden behind the inner LS.

The Schwarzschild radius [FORMULA] defines the typical length scale for general relativistic effects,

[EQUATION]

For rotating black holes the event horizon is changed to [FORMULA]. The angular velocity of the hole in terms of the Kerr parameter a and mass M is

[EQUATION]

Here, we choose [FORMULA].

Mirabel & Rodriguez (1995) mentioned that the de-projected jet speed of [FORMULA] for the galactic superluminal jets could be related to the escape velocity from a region close to a black hole. Further, in contrast to other mildly relativistic jets ([FORMULA]) this is indicating both a black hole as central source and, also, that the jet origin is very close to the hole at a distance of several horizon radii (Mirabel & Rodriguez 1995).

3.2. The accretion disk

An accretion disk surrounding the central black hole seems to be the essential component concerning magnetic jet formation. It is considered to be responsible for the following necessary ingredients for jet formation, propagation, and collimation.

  • Generation of magnetic field. In contrast to pulsar or protostellar jets the magnetic field of jets from black holes, the magnetic field cannot be supplied by the central object but has to be supplied by the surrounding accretion disk.

    Khanna & Camenzind (1994, 1996a) were first to formulate the axisymmetric dynamo equations in Kerr space time. They indicated the possibility of an [FORMULA] dynamo, since differential rotation of space [FORMULA] provides a new source term for the dynamo action. This general relativistic dynamo effect might work very close to the black hole, at distances of about several horizon radii (Khanna & Camenzind 1996a, 1996b; Brandenburg 1996).

    In our model we assume that the jet is formed by a finite flux distribution of the disk. The maximum flux originates from the disk at radii less than the LS radius, and [FORMULA].

  • Mass injection into the jet. The accretion disk supplies the mass for injection into the jet, since there is no mass outflow possible from the black hole itself.

    Certain disk parameters like accretion rate, magnetization and others determine the mass accretion process together with the mass ejection rate (Ferreira & Pelletier 1995). In this paper, we assume that the mass flow is not charge separated and that the plasma is highly conductive in order to justify the assumption of degeneracy (5). Further, the mass flow has to be weak enough (or highly magnetized) in order to assume a force-free source term of the stream equation.

  • The current system. Differential rotation of the disk is responsible for the poloidal current system in the jet magnetosphere. These currents extract angular momentum from the disk and eventually allow for mass accretion into the central object.

    The poloidal current correspond to toroidal magnetic fields and its hoop stress may be responsible for a collimation of the jet.

The accretion disk physics would further determine the rotation law of the jet magnetic field, [FORMULA] (see Sect. 3.5).

The disk evolution is definitely influenced by the evolution of the jet and vice versa (cf. Ferreira & Pelletier 1995). However, since this global problem is literally unresolved, in this paper we take into account the accretion disk only as source for the magnetic flux, i.e. as a boundary condition for the flux function [FORMULA].

3.3. The asymptotic jet

We assume that the asymptotic jet is collimated to a cylindrical shape. This is in agreement with VLBI observations of the knot motion in e.g. 3C 345 (Zensus et al. 1995), and also with kinematic models explaining the short period optical variations by a geometrical lighthouse effect (Camenzind & Krockenberger 1992).

In the case of the parsec-scale jet in the quasar 3C 345, the best model fits give a very small intrinsic opening angle of [FORMULA] (Zensus et al. 1995). The innermost region of the jet is not resolved observationally. In the radio VLBI measurements mentioned above, the angular beam resolution is [FORMULA] corresponding to [FORMULA]. This is comparable to [FORMULA].

The lighthouse model of Camenzind & Krockenberger (1992) reveals a jet radius of [FORMULA] for both 3C 273 and BL Lacertae objects under the assumption that the field rotates with the angular speed of the marginally stable orbit. Further, the black hole parameters were assumed to be [FORMULA] ([FORMULA]) and [FORMULA] ([FORMULA]) for 3C 273 (BL Lacertae objects). The degree of jet collimation is very high and initial opening angles of [FORMULA] ([FORMULA]) are found.

In the asymptotic regime, the metric simplifies to that of flat Minkowski space. Here, the special relativistic, one-dimensional jet equilibrium of Appl & Camenzind (1993) can be applied. They were first to find a non-linear analytical solution for a cylindrically collimated, asymptotic flux distribution,

[EQUATION]

where [FORMULA] is defined as the cylindrical radius normalized by the asymptotic light cylinder radius. The flux distribution (17) corresponds to a core-envelope structure with core radius d. The poloidal current is concentrated within the jet core (see below). With Eq. (17) the asymptotic jet radius is defined by [FORMULA].

Using the method of finite elements for a numerical solution implies that we solve the boundary value problem. It is hence suitable to prescribe the asymptotic jet boundary [FORMULA] and adjust later for the current profile parameter b (see Fendt et al. 1995 for details). This adjustment is the essential procedure in order to satisfy the regularity condition at the light surface.

In conclusion, the poloidal current distribution and the strength of the current are determined by the asymptotic jet. We choose the asymptotic jet radius in terms of asymptotic LC radii [FORMULA] and [FORMULA].

3.4. The current distribution

The poloidal current distribution may be considered as a free function for the force-free stream function (although it is constrained by the regularity condition). In particular, since [FORMULA] in the 3+1 description too, it is possible to apply the same current distribution for the region near the black hole as for the asymptotic, special relativistic region.

Here, we choose the analytical, non-linear solution for special relativistic (asymptotically cylindrical) pinches given by Appl & Camenzind (1993),

[EQUATION]

The parameter b describes the shape of the current profile. Together with the flux distribution (17) this current distribution simultaneously satisfies the asymptotic transfield equation (Appl & Camenzind 1993). The current flow is concentrated within the core radius d (see Eq. (17)). The strength of the current, [FORMULA], and the shape of the profile ([FORMULA] diffuse pinch, [FORMULA] sharp pinch) control the magnetic structure and the kinematics of the jet. In particular, they determine the asymptotic jet radius and velocities.

As discussed above, in our approach we choose the jet radius as parameter and adjust the parameters [FORMULA] and b in such a way that we obtain smooth solutions across the LS with an asymptotic jet radius of a few LC radii.

Eq. (18) represents a monotonous current distribution with no return current within the jet. A closure of the poloidal current flow would be achieved via the jet hot spots terminating the jet and the interstellar/intergalactic medium. In this picture the current is generated in the disk, flows along the jet to the hot spots, and returns back to the accretion disk in the surrounding medium outside of the jet. A return current within the jet might be a more realistic concept. However, serious difficulties for a two dimensional solution are involved with such a current distribution. These are e.g. a proper satisfaction of the regularity condition, as well as the need for a proper boundary condition for the asymptotic jet. We will address this topic to our future work. The solutions presented in this paper may be interpreted as the inner part of such a return current jet.

3.5. The rotation law

As was the case with the current distribution, the rotation law for the flux surfaces is a free function of the force-free stream equation.

In general, this rotation law follows from a detailed examination of the accretion process and the dynamo action in the disk. This is far beyond the scope of this paper and the complex physics of magnetized accretion disks is not yet fully understood. Although there are several models available for the different physical processes involved, such as (magnetic) viscosity, convection, advection, diffusion, kinematics, dynamo action, or relativistic effects, for a combined treatment of all the effects the problem is far from being resolved (not to mention that the jet itself provides an important boundary condition for the disk dynamo).

Having such a solution available, the calculated rotation law, [FORMULA], and flux generation, [FORMULA], would determine the rotation of the magnetic field [FORMULA].

As an example we discuss an approximate steady state solution for the flux distribution of a thin accretion disk around a black hole, [FORMULA], where [FORMULA] is the diffusion parameter of the diffusion equation (Khanna & Camenzind 1992). For radii larger than the marginally stable orbit, [FORMULA], and the integration gives [FORMULA]. Here, [FORMULA] is the outer disk radius and the constant A is of the order of unity. Assuming a Kepler law for the disk rotation and additionally that the foot points of the flux surfaces rotate with Kepler speed, a possible rotation law for the field lines can be derived. Inverting the above disk flux distribution then leads to the rotation law [FORMULA].

As a consequence of differential rotation, the shape and position of the light surface would become a priori unknown quantities. Since these are singular surfaces and have to be considered numerically like boundaries, this would involve serious numerical complications. For this reason, for the time being, we consider [FORMULA]. For the rotational velocity of the field, a fraction of the black hole rotation is assumed,

[EQUATION]

For [FORMULA], [FORMULA], the position of the asymptotic light cylinder is at [FORMULA].

There is strong indication that the superluminal jets originate very close to a central black hole at distances of a few horizon radii. For galactic sources, the argument is that the jet speed is close to the escape velocity near the horizon (see Mirabel & Rodriguez 1995). Standard models for BL Lacertae objects also put the jet formation close to the central source (see Kollgaard (1994) and references therein).

Thus, for these highly relativistic jet sources, the assumption of a constant rotation of the flux surfaces may well be applied. A problem might exist for only mildly relativistic jet motion.

Previous Section Next Section Title Page Table of Contents

© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997

Online publication: July 3, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de